Paper · 2023 · Agronomy Journal

Rye planting date impacts biomass production more than seeding rate and nitrogen fertilizer

Kipling S. Balkcom; Quentin D. Read; Audrey V. Gamble

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Management is critical to maximize cover crop benefits, while minimizing costs. However, cover crop performance and cost can vary without consistent management strategies. Therefore, we investigated how four planting dates (late October, early November, late November, and early December), two seeding rates (67 and 101 kg ha −1 ), and four N rates (0, 34, 67, and 101 kg N ha −1 ) affected rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production, N uptake, C:N ratio, $ per 100 kg biomass, cash crop yields, and soil organic C (SOC) in a peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.)/cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) rotation over six growing seasons (2015–2020) in Headland, Alabama, USA. Biomass production averaged 170% greater for late October planted rye compared to early December across all N rates. Nitrogen increased biomass production, but total biomass amounts decreased with later planting dates. Nitrogen uptake increased as N rate increased for each planting date. The C:N ratio was more sensitive to planting dates than N rates and decreased as planting was delayed. The $ per 100 kg of biomass was similar across all N rates for early planting dates (late October and early November). No yield effect was observed for peanut or cotton, but SOC increased in the 0–5 cm depth when 101 kg N ha −1 was applied to the rye cover crop. Results highlight the importance of planting date compared to seeding and N rates to enhance cover crop performance and return on investment (ROI) for growers in the southeastern United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late October rye produced 170% more biomass than early December rye.

Treatment
late Octobere0
Outcome
Biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
170%e0
Qualifier
across all N ratese0
Comparator
early Decembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass production averaged 170% greater for late October planted rye compared to early December across all N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased rye biomass production.

Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen increased biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later rye planting decreased total biomass.

Treatment
later planting datese0
Outcome
total biomass amountse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total biomass amounts decreased with later planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–905 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye nitrogen uptake rose with nitrogen rate at every planting date.

Treatment
N ratee0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
for each planting datee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake increased as N rate increased for each planting date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye C:N ratio responded more to planting date than nitrogen rate.

Treatment
planting datese0
Outcome
C:N ratioe0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
N ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C:N ratio was more sensitive to planting dates than N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1040 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later rye planting decreased C:N ratio.

Treatment
planting was delayede0
Outcome
C:N ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C:N ratio was more sensitive to planting dates than N rates and decreased as planting was delayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cost per 100 kg rye biomass was similar across nitrogen rates at early planting dates.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
$ per 100 kg of biomasse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
early planting dates (late October and early November)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The $ per 100 kg of biomass was similar across all N rates for early planting dates (late October and early November).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1198 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye ( Secale cereale L., ‘Wrens Abruzzi’) biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye cover crop management had no observed peanut yield effect.

Treatment
rye cover crope1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
No yield effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No yield effect was observed for peanut or cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye cover crop management had no observed cotton yield effect.

Treatment
rye cover crope1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
No yield effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No yield effect was observed for peanut or cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 101 kg N ha −1 to rye increased soil organic carbon at 0–5 cm.

Treatment
101 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0–5 cm depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOC increased in the 0–5 cm depth when 101 kg N ha −1 was applied to the rye cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1341 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors emphasize planting date over seeding and nitrogen rates for cover crop performance and grower returns.

Outcome
planting datee0
Comparator
seeding and N ratese0
Setting
southeastern United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results highlight the importance of planting date compared to seeding and N rates to enhance cover crop performance and return on investment (ROI) for growers in the southeastern United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1536 · show in text ↑
e1

“rye cover crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1341 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Results differ

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

cover crop · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

44 papers: 18 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sowing time · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cover crop · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.