Paper · 2023 · Pest Management Science

Feeding preference and intraguild interactions between the parasitoid Trichogramma achaeae and the predator Macrolophus pygmaeus, two biological agents of Tuta absoluta

Isabel Borges; Luisa Oliveira; Ana Durão; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tuta absoluta is an exotic species and a major pest of tomato crops in Europe. Macrolophus pygmaeus and Trichogramma achaeae are two biocontrol agents widely used in integrated pest management programs of the South American tomato pinworm Tuta absoluta. In this study, we evaluated under laboratory conditions the (i) voracity of M. pygmaeus females fed on single diets of Tuta absoluta eggs parasitized or unparasitized by Trichogramma achaeae, (ii) voracity and feeding preference of M. pygmaeus females provided with mixed diets of Tuta absoluta eggs unparasitized and parasitized by Trichogramma achaeae and (iii) effect of competitive and intraguild interactions between M. pygmaeus and Trichogramma achaeae on the number of Tuta absoluta eggs consumed and/or parasitized. Lastly, we assessed under field conditions the effect of interspecific and intraspecific interactions between natural enemies on the number of Tuta absoluta eggs consumed and/or parasitized. RESULTS: Macrolophus pygmaeus consumed more unparasitized than parasitized eggs of Tuta absoluta. Under mixed diet regimes, Manly indices revealed a feeding preference for unparasitized eggs, and a decrease in the total number of eggs consumed, as the proportion of available parasitized eggs increased, whereas the unparasitized eggs were consumed in direct proportion to their availability. Conspecific interactions between M. pygmaeus, in contrast to Trichogramma achaeae, revealed the possible occurrence of intraspecific competition. For intraguild heterospecific interactions, the number of Tuta absoluta eggs consumed by M. pygmaeus and parasitized by Trichogramma achaeae was lower than that predicted for additive and non-interactive scenarios. Under field conditions, a significant difference between the conspecific treatment and heterospecific treatments revealed a slightly higher success rate in controlling Tuta absoluta when both M. pygmaeus and Trichogramma achaeae were used simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Macrolophus pygmaeus prefers unparasitized eggs of Tuta absoluta but inflicts intraguild predation on Trichogramma achaeae. In conspecific experiments, mutual interference between M. pygmaeus predators intensifies as the number of individuals increases, but for Trichogramma achaeae, it occurs in an unpredictable manner. Adding Trichogramma achaeae could significantly increase the level of control of Tuta absoluta compared to what could be achieved when only M. pygmaeus is present in glasshouse tomatoes. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrolophus pygmaeus consumed more unparasitized than parasitized Tuta absoluta eggs.

Taxon
Macrolophus pygmaeusMacrolophus pygmaeuse0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
eggs of Tuta absolutae0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
parasitizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macrolophus pygmaeus
Macrolophus pygmaeus · TaxonPetro Pynnönen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macrolophus pygmaeus consumed more unparasitized than parasitized eggs of Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed diets showed a preference for unparasitized Tuta absoluta eggs.

Taxon
M. pygmaeusMacrolophus pygmaeuse2
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
feeding preference for unparasitized eggse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macrolophus pygmaeus
Macrolophus pygmaeus · TaxonPetro Pynnönen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under mixed diet regimes, Manly indices revealed a feeding preference for unparasitized eggs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“single diets of Tuta absoluta eggs parasitized”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–415 · show in text ↑
e2

“voracity of M. pygmaeus females”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–361 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conspecific M. pygmaeus interactions suggested intraspecific competition.

Taxon
M. pygmaeusMacrolophus pygmaeuse0
Outcome
possible occurrence of intraspecific competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macrolophus pygmaeus
Macrolophus pygmaeus · TaxonPetro Pynnönen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conspecific interactions between M. pygmaeus, in contrast to Trichogramma achaeae, revealed the possible occurrence of intraspecific competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterospecific interactions yielded fewer consumed and parasitized Tuta absoluta eggs than additive predictions.

Taxon
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0
Interactor
M. pygmaeusMacrolophus pygmaeuse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Trichogramma achaeaeTrichogramma achaeaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of Tuta absoluta eggs consumede0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
additive and non-interactive scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · TaxonPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrolophus pygmaeus
Macrolophus pygmaeus · InteractorPetro Pynnönen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of Tuta absoluta eggs consumed by M. pygmaeus and parasitized by Trichogramma achaeae was lower than that predicted for additive and non-interactive scenarios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Using both natural enemies in the field achieved a slightly higher Tuta absoluta control success rate than conspecific treatments.

Treatment
both M. pygmaeus and Trichogramma achaeae were used simultaneouslye0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Second interactor
M. pygmaeusMacrolophus pygmaeuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
success rate in controlling Tuta absolutae0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Trichogramma achaeaee0
Comparator
conspecific treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrolophus pygmaeus
Macrolophus pygmaeus · Second interactorPetro Pynnönen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant difference between the conspecific treatment and heterospecific treatments revealed a slightly higher success rate in controlling Tuta absoluta when both M. pygmaeus and Trichogramma achaeae were used simultaneously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1988 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Trichogramma achaeae may increase Tuta absoluta control over M. pygmaeus alone in glasshouse tomatoes.

Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma achaeaeTrichogramma achaeaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Adding Trichogramma achaeae could significantly increase the level of control of Tuta absolutae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding Trichogramma achaeae could significantly increase the level of control of Tuta absoluta compared to what could be achieved when only M. pygmaeus is present in glasshouse tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2509 · show in text ↑

Macrolophus pygmaeus · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.