Abstract
The experiment was conducted at the fields of the Abu Ghraib Research Station's Agricultural Research Department, Ministry of Agriculture during 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 Seasons, this study was aimed evaluation herbicides for controlling narrow and broad weed. The experiment included the use of Pallas OD herbicide, with an application rate of 500 ml. ha-1 and Limitless WG with application rate 400 g. ha-1 + 500 ml. ha-1 activator in addition to free weed treatment and weedy control treatment. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates was used. Limitless herbicide treatment achieved the lowest mean number of weeds, which were 1.3 and 2.3 plants. m-2 with a control rate of 93.44% and 91.1%, in comparison to the weedy treatment, it decreased the dry weight of the weed (1.97 and 3.22 g. m-2) with an inhibition rate of 88.46% and 87.1% for the two seasons, respectively, which had the most weeds on average, at 22.67 and 28.7 plants. Throughout the two seasons, the weed plants with the highest average dry weight were 19.12 and 24.86 g. m-2. The number of weeds and plants.m-2 and the control rate were identical between the control treatments using Limitless and Pallas. The number of grains and spikes increased (by 39.2 and 43.20 percent, respectively) with the Limitless therapy. In comparison to the weedy treatment, spike-1 increased grain productivity by 56.9% and 66.47% for both seasons, with a percentage of 32.7% and 36.08%, weight of 1000 grains at a rate of 27.47% and 24.83%. It can be concluded that weed herbicides with low and high concentrations can be used to kill weeds in wheat fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Limitless gave the lowest weed density, 1.3 and 2.3 plants m-2, and control rates of 93.44% and 91.1% across two seasons.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Limitless herbicide treatmente0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number of weedse0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1.3 and 2.3 plants. m-2e0
- Comparator
- weedy treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Limitless herbicide treatment achieved the lowest mean number of weeds, which were 1.3 and 2.3 plants. m-2 with a control rate of 93.44% and 91.1%, in comparison to the weedy treatment”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Limitless reduced weed dry weight to 1.97 and 3.22 g m-2 across two seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Limitlesse1
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- dry weight of the weede0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 1.97 and 3.22 g. m-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it decreased the dry weight of the weed (1.97 and 3.22 g. m-2) with an inhibition rate of 88.46% and 87.1% for the two seasons”
t0“wheat”
e1“Limitless herbicide treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Limitless and Pallas gave identical weed number and control rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Limitlesse0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- number of weeds and plants.m-2 and the control ratee0
- Direction
- identicale0
- Comparator
- Pallase0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of weeds and plants.m-2 and the control rate were identical between the control treatments using Limitless and Pallas.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Limitless increased grain and spike numbers by 39.2% and 43.20%, respectively.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Limitlesse0
- Outcome
- number of grainse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 39.2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of grains and spikes increased (by 39.2 and 43.20 percent, respectively) with the Limitless therapy.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Limitless increased spike numbers by 43.20 percent.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Limitlesse0
- Outcome
- spikese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 43.20 percente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of grains and spikes increased (by 39.2 and 43.20 percent, respectively) with the Limitless therapy.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative to weedy treatment, the reported spike-1 grain productivity increased by 56.9% and 66.47% over two seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Limitlesse1
- Outcome
- grain productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 56.9% and 66.47%e0
- Comparator
- weedy treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In comparison to the weedy treatment, spike-1 increased grain productivity by 56.9% and 66.47% for both seasons”
t0“wheat”
e1“Limitless herbicide treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The reported 1000-grain weight rate was 27.47% and 24.83% across two seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- weight of 1000 grainse0
- Value
- 27.47% and 24.83%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weight of 1000 grains at a rate of 27.47% and 24.83%.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend herbicides to kill weeds in wheat fields.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- kill weedse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“weed herbicides with low and high concentrations can be used to kill weeds in wheat fields.”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
397 papers more in this group
See all 401 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.