Abstract
Purpose. To determine the productivity indicators of spring triticale and common vetch in singlespecies and companion sowings depending on the ratio of components and fertilizers. Methods. Field, laboratory, mathematical and statistical. Results. The results on the study of productivity, recoupment of fertilizers and specific features of the feed biomass growth in cultivation of spring triticale and common vetch in single-species and companion crops depending on the ratio of components on the Forest Steppe black soils, conducted annually during 2020-2022, are shown. Conclusions. In the companion cultivation of spring triticale and common vetch on different fertilization backgrounds, the productivity of the fodder agrocenosis increases from 5.15-6.44 to 5.29-6.87 t/ha of dry mass, which is 1-6% more compared to single-species sowings of spring triticale and by 9-26% compared to single-species common vetch sowings. The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively, of binary grass mixtures with different ratios of these crops – by 3-11%, and when applying N45P45K45 mineral fertilizers – by 21, 11 and 23-24% respectively. The profitability of 1 kg of Humigran was 1.4-3.3 kg, and 1 kg of N45P45K45 showed the lowest indicators on single-species sowing of vetch – 4.1-9.4 kg of dry mass. The most influential factor in terms of yield from 1 ha of dry matter is the herbage factor with a 54% share. On the background without fertilizers, for 50 days, starting from May 10, during spring triticale yield formation, the output of dry feed biomass from 1 ha increased from 0.87 to 5.20 t (in the milk ripeness phase it decreased to 5.06 t), in common vetch and triticale-vetch mixture with a 25:75 ratio of components – from 0.64 to 4.86 and from 0.89 to 5.57 t/ha, respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Companion sowing produced 5.29-6.87 t/ha dry mass, 1-6% above triticale alone.
- Taxon
- spring triticale and common vetch
_Vicia_sativa.jpg?width=60)
Vicia sativa
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- spring triticale and common vetche0
- Outcome
- productivity of the fodder agrocenosise0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 5.29-6.87 t/hae0
- Comparator
- single-species sowings of spring triticalee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Vicia_sativa.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“spring triticale and common vetch on different fertilization backgrounds, the productivity of the fodder agrocenosis increases from 5.15-6.44 to 5.29-6.87 t/ha of dry mass, which is 1-6% more compared to single-species sowings of spring triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Companion sowing yielded 9-26% more dry mass than common vetch alone.
- Taxon
- spring triticale and common vetchVicia sativa×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- spring triticale and common vetche0
- Outcome
- productivity of the fodder agrocenosise0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 9-26%e0
- Comparator
- single-species common vetch sowingse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“spring triticale and common vetch on different fertilization backgrounds, the productivity of the fodder agrocenosis increases from 5.15-6.44 to 5.29-6.87 t/ha of dry mass, which is 1-6% more compared to single-species sowings of spring triticale and by 9-26% compared to single-species common vetch sowings”
Claim · model-written summary
Humigran increased triticale feed productivity by 13%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- Humigran organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- feed productivitye0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 13e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Humigran increased vetch feed productivity by 7%.
- Taxon
- common vetchVicia sativae0
- Treatment
- Humigran organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- feed productivitye0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Humigran raised mixed forage productivity by 3-11%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale and common vetchVicia sativa×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- Humigrane2
- Outcome
- feed productivitye2
- Direction
- increasese2
- Value
- 3-11%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of binary grass mixtures with different ratios of these crops – by 3-11%”
e1“spring triticale and common vetch companion sowings”
e2“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer raised triticale feed productivity by 21%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- N45P45K45 mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- feed productivitye2
- Direction
- increasese2
- Value
- 21e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when applying N45P45K45 mineral fertilizers – by 21, 11 and 23-24% respectively”
e1“spring triticale and common vetch companion sowings”
e2“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer raised vetch feed productivity by 11%.
- Taxon
- common vetchVicia sativae1
- Treatment
- N45P45K45 mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- feed productivitye2
- Direction
- increasese2
- Value
- 11e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when applying N45P45K45 mineral fertilizers – by 21, 11 and 23-24% respectively”
e1“spring triticale and common vetch companion sowings”
e2“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mineral fertilizer raised mixed forage productivity by 23-24%.
- Taxon
- spring triticale and common vetchVicia sativa×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- N45P45K45 mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- feed productivitye2
- Direction
- increasese2
- Value
- 23-24%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when applying N45P45K45 mineral fertilizers – by 21, 11 and 23-24% respectively”
e1“spring triticale and common vetch companion sowings”
e2“The use of Humigran organic fertilizer increases the feed productivity of single-species crops of spring triticale and common vetch by 13 and 7% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbage factor accounted for 54% of dry matter yield.
- Taxon
- spring triticale and common vetchVicia sativa×Triticosecalee1
- Treatment
- herbage factore0
- Outcome
- yield from 1 ha of dry mattere0
- Value
- 54%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most influential factor in terms of yield from 1 ha of dry matter is the herbage factor with a 54% share”
e1“spring triticale and common vetch companion sowings”
The same questions in other papers
x Triticosecale · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →fertilization · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.