Paper · 2023 · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology

The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield

Saeed Anwar; Ahmad Ali; Zahid Ullah; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deficiency of micronutrients is a major problem faced by nearly half of the world population due to intake of poor-quality food. To overcome the problem of malnutrition, biofortification of cereal crops is believed to be a good approach to increase nutrient contents in our daily food. The purpose of the current study was therefore to investigate the effect of foliar applied copper and boron alone and in combination with Trichoderma harzianum on yield attributes, grain quality, and nutrient contents of wheat. Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content. In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P. This study concludes that the bioreagent T. harzianum along with foliar copper and boron may lead to reasonably enhanced grain quality and growth characteristics of wheat, further suggesting that the combined application of micronutrients along with T. harzianum under suitable conditions will make it an acceptable approach for crop improvements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat plant height relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat spike length relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat kernels per spike relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
kernels per spikee0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat harvest index relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly enhanced wheat chlorophyll content relative to the control.

Treatment
copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianume0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
a control sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants were treated with copper and boron in combination with or without T. harzianum . The applied treatments included Cu (0.05 M), Cu (0.1 M), T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.05 M), B (0.1 M), B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum, Cu (0.05 M)/B (0.05 M)/ T. harzianum, and Cu (0.1 M)/B (0.1 M)/ T. harzianum along with a control set for comparison. Results revealed significant enhancement in different studied growth traits including plant height, spike length, kernels per spike, harvest index, and chlorophyll content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Impact of Trichoderma harzianum Together with Copper and Boron on Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment approach enriched wheat grains with Cu.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment approach enriched wheat grains with Fe.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment approach enriched wheat grains with Zn.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment approach enriched wheat grains with K.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment approach enriched wheat grains with P.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
this approache0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
enrichede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, this approach also enriched wheat grains with various micro/macronutrients including Cu, Fe, Zn, K, and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1216 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined micronutrients and T. harzianum for wheat crop improvement under suitable conditions.

Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0symbiont
Outcome
combined application of micronutrients along with T. harzianum under suitable conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study concludes that the bioreagent T. harzianum along with foliar copper and boron may lead to reasonably enhanced grain quality and growth characteristics of wheat, further suggesting that the combined application of micronutrients along with T. harzianum under suitable conditions will make it an acceptable approach for crop improvements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1564 · show in text ↑

copper atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

boron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 20 positive, 17 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

copper atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

61 papers: 31 positive, 30 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.