Paper · 2023 · Foods

Effect of Olive Pomace Extract Application and Packaging Material on the Preservation of Fresh-Cut Royal Gala Apples

Joana Madureira; Bruno Melgar; Vítor D. Alves; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The efficiency of natural olive pomace extracts for enhancing the quality of fresh-cut apples was compared with commercial ascorbic acid and two different packaging films (biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and oriented polypropylene (OPP)) were tested. The composition of atmosphere inside the packages, the physicochemical parameters (firmness, weight loss and color), the microbial load, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of fresh-cut apples were evaluated throughout 12 days of storage at 4 °C. After 12 days of refrigerated storage, a significant decrease in O2 was promoted in PLA films, and the weight loss of the whole packaging was higher in PLA films (5.4%) than in OPP films (0.2%). Natural olive pomace extracts reduced the load of mesophilic bacteria (3.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively) and filamentous fungi (3.3 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.44 ± 0.05 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively) growth in fresh-cut apples after five days of storage at 4 °C, and no detection of coliforms was verified throughout the 12 days of storage. In general, the olive pomace extract preserved or improved the total phenolic index and antioxidant potential of the fruit, without significant changes in their firmness. Moreover, this extract seemed to be more effective when combined with the biodegradable PLA film packaging. This work can contribute to the availability of effective natural food additives, the sustainability of the olive oil industries and the reduction of environmental impact. It can also be useful in meeting the food industries requirements to develop new functional food products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PLA films decreased package oxygen after 12 days.

Treatment
PLA filmse0
Outcome
O2e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
After 12 days of refrigerated storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 12 days of refrigerated storage, a significant decrease in O2 was promoted in PLA films”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Package weight loss was 5.4% in PLA films versus 0.2% in OPP films.

Treatment
PLA filmse0
Outcome
weight loss of the whole packaginge0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.4%e0
Qualifier
0.2%e0
Comparator
OPP filmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weight loss of the whole packaging was higher in PLA films (5.4%) than in OPP films (0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract reduced mesophilic bacterial load in OPP-packaged apples.

Treatment
Natural olive pomace extractse0
Outcome
load of mesophilic bacteriae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/ge0
Qualifier
OPPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural olive pomace extracts reduced the load of mesophilic bacteria (3.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract reduced mesophilic bacterial load in PLA-packaged apples.

Treatment
Natural olive pomace extractse0
Outcome
load of mesophilic bacteriae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/ge0
Qualifier
PLAe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural olive pomace extracts reduced the load of mesophilic bacteria (3.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.4 ± 0.1 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract reduced filamentous fungi in OPP-packaged apples.

Treatment
olive pomace extractt1
Outcome
filamentous fungie0
Value
3.3 ± 0.1 log CFU/ge0
Qualifier
OPPe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“filamentous fungi (3.3 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.44 ± 0.05 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively) growth in fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
t1

“Olive Pomace Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract reduced filamentous fungi in PLA-packaged apples.

Treatment
olive pomace extractt1
Outcome
filamentous fungie0
Value
2.44 ± 0.05 log CFU/ge0
Qualifier
PLAe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“filamentous fungi (3.3 ± 0.1 log CFU/g and 2.44 ± 0.05 log CFU/g for OPP and PLA films, respectively) growth in fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–993 · show in text ↑
t1

“Olive Pomace Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coliforms were undetected throughout 12 days of storage.

Outcome
no detection of coliformse0
Qualifier
throughout the 12 days of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no detection of coliforms was verified throughout the 12 days of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract preserved or improved total phenolic index and antioxidant potential.

Treatment
olive pomace extracte0
Outcome
total phenolic index and antioxidant potentiale0
Direction
preserved or improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“olive pomace extract preserved or improved the total phenolic index and antioxidant potential of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract did not significantly change apple firmness.

Treatment
olive pomace extractt1
Outcome
firmnesse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without significant changes in their firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑
t1

“Olive Pomace Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive pomace extract seemed more effective with PLA film.

Treatment
biodegradable PLA film packaginge0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this extract seemed to be more effective when combined with the biodegradable PLA film packaging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–116 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.