Paper · 1999 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of pre-sowing irrigation and soil mulch on yield attributes, yield and wateruse of chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)

S.N. Prasad; Ratan Singh; D H Rao

17
claims
25
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1990-91 to 1992-93 to study the effect of 3 depths of pre-sowing irrigation (0,5 and 10 cm) and soil mulch on yield attributes, yield, water-use and water-use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czemj. & Cosson.). Data revealed that yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater use of crops progressively increased with the depth of irrigation. The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation. However, the yield differences between 5 Dnd 10 cm irrigation were significantly at par. Indian mustard gave the highest chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha) which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively. The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed. Irrigation also increased the water-use efficiency. Indian mustard showed the highest water-use efficiency (16.5 kg/ha-mm) and linseed the lowest (10.2 kg/ha-mm). Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigation was not found effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes, grain and equivalent yield, and water use rose with irrigation depth.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)Brassica junceaCicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
depth of irrigatione0
Outcome
yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater usee0
Direction
progressively increasede0
Comparator
depth of irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater use of crops progressively increased with the depth of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea grain yield increased 50% with 5 cm irrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
5 and 10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linseed grain yield increased 61% with 5 cm irrigation.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
5 and 10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
61e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard grain yield increased 80% with 5 cm irrigation.

Taxon
indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
5 and 10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea grain yield increased 63% with 10 cm irrigation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
63e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linseed grain yield increased 69% with 10 cm irrigation.

Taxon
linseede0
Treatment
10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
69e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard grain yield increased 92% with 10 cm irrigation.

Taxon
indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences between 5 and 10 cm irrigation were statistically at par.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)Brassica junceaCicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
10 cm irrigatione0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
5 Dnde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield differences between 5 Dnd 10 cm irrigation were significantly at par”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard had the highest chickpea equivalent yield of 2 094 kg/ ha.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
chickpea equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2 094 kg/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard gave the highest chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard equivalent yield exceeded chickpea by 29.7%.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
chickpea equivalent yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
29.7e0
Comparator
chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–184 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard equivalent yield exceeded linseed by 76.6%.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
chickpea equivalent yielde1
Direction
highere0
Value
76.6%e0
Comparator
linseede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 152–184 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea water use was 125 mm, 8.7% above linseed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
water-use of chickpeae0
Direction
highere0
Value
125 mme0
Qualifier
8.7e0
Comparator
linseede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard water use was 124 mm, 7.8% above linseed.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
water-usee0
Direction
highere0
Value
124 mme0
Qualifier
7.8%e0
Comparator
linseede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased water use efficiency.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)Brassica junceaCicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation also increased the water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indian mustard had the highest water use efficiency, 16.5 kg/ha-mm.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.5 kg/ha-mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indian mustard showed the highest water-use efficiency (16.5 kg/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linseed had the lowest water use efficiency, 10.2 kg/ha-mm.

Taxon
linseede0
Outcome
the loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
10.2 kg/ha-mme0

Verbatim

e0

“linseed the lowest (10.2 kg/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil mulch alone or with irrigation was ineffective.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)Brassica junceaCicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigatione0
Outcome
not found effectivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigation was not found effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–184 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.