Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 1990-91 to 1992-93 to study the effect of 3 depths of pre-sowing irrigation (0,5 and 10 cm) and soil mulch on yield attributes, yield, water-use and water-use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czemj. & Cosson.). Data revealed that yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater use of crops progressively increased with the depth of irrigation. The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation. However, the yield differences between 5 Dnd 10 cm irrigation were significantly at par. Indian mustard gave the highest chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha) which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively. The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed. Irrigation also increased the water-use efficiency. Indian mustard showed the highest water-use efficiency (16.5 kg/ha-mm) and linseed the lowest (10.2 kg/ha-mm). Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigation was not found effective.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Yield attributes, grain and equivalent yield, and water use rose with irrigation depth.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
Brassica juncea
Cicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- depth of irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater usee0
- Direction
- progressively increasede0
- Comparator
- depth of irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“yield attributes, grain and chickpea equivalent yield andwater use of crops progressively increased with the depth of irrigation”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea grain yield increased 50% with 5 cm irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 5 and 10 cm irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 50e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Linseed grain yield increased 61% with 5 cm irrigation.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard grain yield increased 80% with 5 cm irrigation.
- Taxon
- indian mustard
Brassica junceae0
- Treatment
- 5 and 10 cm irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 80%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea grain yield increased 63% with 10 cm irrigation.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- 10 cm irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 63e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Linseed grain yield increased 69% with 10 cm irrigation.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard grain yield increased 92% with 10 cm irrigation.
- Taxon
- indian mustard
Brassica junceae0
- Treatment
- 10 cm irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 92%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average increase in grain yield was 50, 61 and 80%, and 63, 69 and 92% in chickpea, linseed and indian mustard respectively with 5 and 10 cm irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield differences between 5 and 10 cm irrigation were statistically at par.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
Brassica juncea
Cicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- 10 cm irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yield differencese0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- 5 Dnde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“yield differences between 5 Dnd 10 cm irrigation were significantly at par”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard had the highest chickpea equivalent yield of 2 094 kg/ ha.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceae0
- Outcome
- chickpea equivalent yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2 094 kg/ hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indian mustard gave the highest chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard equivalent yield exceeded chickpea by 29.7%.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- chickpea equivalent yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 29.7e0
- Comparator
- chickpeae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard equivalent yield exceeded linseed by 76.6%.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- chickpea equivalent yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 76.6%e0
- Comparator
- linseede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which was 29.7 and 76.6% higher than chickpea and linseed respectively”
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
e1“chickpea equivalent yield (2 094 kg/ ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chickpea water use was 125 mm, 8.7% above linseed.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Outcome
- water-use of chickpeae0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 125 mme0
- Qualifier
- 8.7e0
- Comparator
- linseede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard water use was 124 mm, 7.8% above linseed.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceae0
- Outcome
- water-usee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 124 mme0
- Qualifier
- 7.8%e0
- Comparator
- linseede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The water-use of chickpea (125 mm) and Indian mustard (124 mm) was 8.7 and 7.8% higher respectively than that of linseed”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
Brassica juncea
Cicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- Irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation also increased the water-use efficiency”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian mustard had the highest water use efficiency, 16.5 kg/ha-mm.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceae0
- Outcome
- water-use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 16.5 kg/ha-mme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Indian mustard showed the highest water-use efficiency (16.5 kg/ha-mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Linseed had the lowest water use efficiency, 10.2 kg/ha-mm.
Verbatim
e0“linseed the lowest (10.2 kg/ha-mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil mulch alone or with irrigation was ineffective.
- Taxon
- chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)
Brassica juncea
Cicer arietinumLinum usitatissimumt0
- Treatment
- Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigatione0
- Outcome
- not found effectivee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Soil mulch alone or in combination with irrigation was not found effective”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum) and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →irrigation · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →irrigation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.