Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Mealworm Frass as a Potential Organic Fertilizer in Synergy with PGP-Based Biostimulant for Lettuce Plants

Teresa Fuertes-Mendizábal; Isabel Salcedo; Ximena Huérfano; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores the potential use of frass, the larval excrement residue obtained from mealworm rearing, as organic fertilizer for crops. Its high organic matter content means that its joint application with a biostimulant based on efficient microorganisms, favoring its mineralization, is of interest. An experiment with lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L.) was conducted with two factors and six replicates under greenhouse conditions. The first factor was frass amendment at 0%, 1%, 2.5%, and 5% of the peat substrate, and the second factor was a Bacillus-based BS at two levels, with and without efficient microorganism application. The results reveal that frass shows great potential as an organic fertilizer, providing macronutrients and increasing lettuce aerial biomass, although its effect is mediated by the application rate. Rates of 2.5% or higher proved negative for lettuce plant growth, especially root development, probably due to an increased incidence of potentially pathogenic fungi. The negative effect of medium–high frass rates was counteracted by the addition of a PGP-based biostimulant, enhancing lettuce plant nutrient uptake, aerial biomass, and quality in terms of succulence, but also favoring microbial diversity in the rhizosphere, increasing the incidence of beneficial microorganisms, and decreasing potentially pathogenic fungi. This positive synergy observed between frass and the PGP-based biostimulant is of interest for the design of new organic fertilization strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frass supplied macronutrients and increased lettuce aerial biomass, depending on rate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
frasse0
Outcome
aerial biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
mediated by the application ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“frass shows great potential as an organic fertilizer, providing macronutrients and increasing lettuce aerial biomass, although its effect is mediated by the application rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frass rates of 2.5% or higher impaired lettuce growth, especially root development.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Rates of 2.5% or highere0
Interactor
potentially pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth, especially root developmente0
Direction
negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates of 2.5% or higher proved negative for lettuce plant growth, especially root development, probably due to an increased incidence of potentially pathogenic fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding a PGP-based biostimulant counteracted the adverse effect of medium to high frass rates.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
addition of a PGP-based biostimulante0
Outcome
negative effecte0
Direction
counteractede0
Comparator
medium–high frass ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effect of medium–high frass rates was counteracted by the addition of a PGP-based biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biostimulant enhanced lettuce nutrient uptake, aerial biomass, and succulence.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
PGP-based biostimulante1
Outcome
nutrient uptake, aerial biomass, and quality in terms of succulencee0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancing lettuce plant nutrient uptake, aerial biomass, and quality in terms of succulence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1205 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of a PGP-based biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biostimulant increased rhizosphere microbial diversity and beneficial microorganisms.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
PGP-based biostimulante1
Interactor
beneficial microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
microbial diversity in the rhizosphere, increasing the incidence of beneficial microorganismse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“favoring microbial diversity in the rhizosphere, increasing the incidence of beneficial microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1318 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of a PGP-based biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biostimulant decreased potentially pathogenic fungi.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
PGP-based biostimulante1
Interactor
potentially pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Outcome
potentially pathogenic fungie0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing potentially pathogenic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of a PGP-based biostimulant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–106 · show in text ↑

other · disease · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · soil: biology · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: general · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.