Paper · 2023 · PLoS ONE

Heat shock exposure during early wheat grain development can reduce maximum endosperm cell number but not necessarily final grain dry mass

Christine Girousse

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Post-anthesis heat shocks, which are expected to increase in frequency under climate change, may affect wheat grain development and lead to significant decreases in grain yield. Grain development occurs in three phases, the lag-phase, the filling-phase, and maturation. The growth of the three main compartments of the grain (outer layers (OLs), endosperm, embryo) is staggered, so that heat shocks affect time- and tissue-specific growth processes differentially depending on their timing. We hypothesized that heat shocks during the lag-phase may reduce final grain size, resulting from a reduction in endosperm cell number and/or a restricted OLs growth. Plants were heated for four consecutive days during the lag-phase or the filling-phase or both phases (lag- and filling-). Heat shocks consisted in four hours a day at 38°C and 21°C for the rest of the day. Controlled plants were maintained at 21/14°C (day/night). For each temperature treatment, kinetics of whole grain and compartment masses and dimensions were measured as well as the endosperm cell number. An early heat shock reduced endosperm cell proliferation. However, the growth patterns neither of endosperm nor of OLs were modified compared to controls, resulting in no differences in final grain size. Furthermore, compared to controls, a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced both the duration and rate of dry mass accumulation into grains, whereas two consecutive shocks reduced the duration but enhanced the rate of dry mass of accumulation, even when endosperm cell number was reduced. The mean endosperm cell size was shown to be larger after early heat shocks. All together, these results suggest a compensatory mechanism exists to regulate endosperm cell size and number. This process might be a new mechanistic target for molecular studies and would improve our understanding of post-anthesis wheat tolerance to heat-shocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early heat shock reduced wheat endosperm cell proliferation.

Treatment
An early heat shocke0
Outcome
endosperm cell proliferatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An early heat shock reduced endosperm cell proliferation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endosperm and outer layer growth patterns were unchanged after heat shock.

Treatment
heat shocke1
Outcome
growth patterns neither of endosperm nor of OLse0
Direction
were modifiede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the growth patterns neither of endosperm nor of OLs were modified compared to controls, resulting in no differences in final grain size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“An early heat shock reduced endosperm cell proliferation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock caused no difference in final grain size.

Treatment
heat shocke1
Outcome
final grain sizee0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the growth patterns neither of endosperm nor of OLs were modified compared to controls, resulting in no differences in final grain size.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“An early heat shock reduced endosperm cell proliferation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced duration.

Treatment
a single heat shock during the filling-phasee0
Outcome
duratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, compared to controls, a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced both the duration and rate of dry mass accumulation into grains, whereas two consecutive shocks reduced the duration but enhanced the rate of dry mass of accumulation, even when endosperm cell number was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced rate of dry mass accumulation into grains.

Treatment
a single heat shock during the filling-phasee0
Outcome
rate of dry mass accumulation into grainse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, compared to controls, a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced both the duration and rate of dry mass accumulation into grains, whereas two consecutive shocks reduced the duration but enhanced the rate of dry mass of accumulation, even when endosperm cell number was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

two consecutive shocks reduced duration.

Treatment
two consecutive shockse0
Outcome
duratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, compared to controls, a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced both the duration and rate of dry mass accumulation into grains, whereas two consecutive shocks reduced the duration but enhanced the rate of dry mass of accumulation, even when endosperm cell number was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

two consecutive shocks enhanced rate of dry mass of accumulation.

Treatment
two consecutive shockse0
Outcome
rate of dry mass of accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, compared to controls, a single heat shock during the filling-phase reduced both the duration and rate of dry mass accumulation into grains, whereas two consecutive shocks reduced the duration but enhanced the rate of dry mass of accumulation, even when endosperm cell number was reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early heat shocks increased mean endosperm cell size.

Treatment
early heat shockse0
Outcome
mean endosperm cell sizee0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean endosperm cell size was shown to be larger after early heat shocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose compensation between endosperm cell size and number.

Outcome
endosperm cell size and numbere0
Qualifier
compensatory mechanisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All together, these results suggest a compensatory mechanism exists to regulate endosperm cell size and number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1762 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑

heat · cytology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.