Paper · 2023 · Journal of Entomological Research

Bio-efficacy of pesticides against aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch in cowpea and its effect on natural enemies

P.K. Thakar; J.R. Patel; P.H. Rabari

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractAmongst different pesticides evaluated, flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.). Among the effect of different pesticides against ladybird beetle (adult and grub) and syrphid fly (maggot), Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 WP (2 × 109 cfu/g) @ 0.004%, Lantana camera leaf extract @ 10% has showed relatively safer as compared with the other pesticides on the basis of natural enemies. Based on PCBR, the highest return was obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% as compared with the other pesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid was among the most effective pesticides against cowpea aphids.

Treatment
flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%e0
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
Aphis craccivora populatione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam was among the most effective pesticides against cowpea aphids.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010%e0
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
Aphis craccivora populatione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorfenapyr was among the most effective pesticides against cowpea aphids.

Treatment
chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015%e0
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorae0pest
Outcome
Aphis craccivora populatione0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flonicamid gave higher cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam gave higher cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorfenapyr gave higher cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015%e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flonicamid 50 WG @ 0.015%, thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% and chlorfenapyr 10 SC @ 0.015% were found most effective against aphid, Aphis craccivora population and also gave higher grain yield of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lecanicillium lecanii was relatively safer for ladybird beetles and syrphid flies than other pesticides.

Treatment
Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 WP (2 × 109 cfu/g) @ 0.004%e0
Interactor
Lecanicillium lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
natural enemiese0
Direction
relatively safere0
Comparator
other pesticidese0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · InteractorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 WP (2 × 109 cfu/g) @ 0.004%, Lantana camera leaf extract @ 10% has showed relatively safer as compared with the other pesticides on the basis of natural enemies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana camera leaf extract was relatively safer for natural enemies than other pesticides.

Treatment
Lantana camera leaf extract @ 10%e0
Outcome
natural enemiese0
Direction
relatively safere0
Comparator
other pesticidese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Lecanicillium lecanii 1.15 WP (2 × 109 cfu/g) @ 0.004%, Lantana camera leaf extract @ 10% has showed relatively safer as compared with the other pesticides on the basis of natural enemies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam produced the highest return based on PCBR.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010%e0
Outcome
returne0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other pesticidese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Based on PCBR, the highest return was obtained with the treatment of thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.010% as compared with the other pesticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–704 · show in text ↑

flonicamid · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chlorfenapyr · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlorfenapyr · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiamethoxam · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

botanical · ecology: diversity · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.