Abstract
The persistent toxicity of commercial formulations of seven selected insecticides was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house of Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, and PJTSAU. Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively. The PT (product of toxicity) of test insecticides were in the order: Imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dimethoate, thiamethoxam, diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr at 24 and 48 hours, respectively, which indicated that imidacloprid was more persistent followed by acetamiprid and dimethoate than the remaining insecticides.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid had the highest persistence against the cowpea aphid, 19 and 20 days.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- imidaclopride1
- Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- persistencee1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 19 and 20 dayse1
- Comparator
- acetamipride1
- Setting
- green housee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e1“Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Acetamiprid persistence was 15 and 16 days, followed by dimethoate.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- acetamipride1
- Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- persistencee1
- Direction
- followed bye1
- Value
- 15 and 16 dayse1
- Comparator
- dimethoatee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e1“Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Dimethoate persistence was 13 and 14 days, lower than thiamethoxam.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- dimethoatee1
- Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- persistencee1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 13 and 14 dayse1
- Comparator
- thiamethoxame1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e1“Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam persistence was 11 and 19 days, lower than diafenthiuron.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- thiamethoxame1
- Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- persistencee1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 11 and 19 dayse1
- Comparator
- diafenthiurone1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e1“Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr had the lowest persistence, 9 and 10 days.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyre1
- Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- persistencee1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 9 days each and 10 days eache1
- Comparator
- thiamethoxame1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e1“Of different treatments, highest persistence was shown by the imidacloprid (19 and 20 days) followed by acetamiprid (15 and 16 days) > dimethoate (13 and 14 days) > thiamethoxam (11 and 19 days) > diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr (9 days each and 10 days each) at 24 and 48 hours of exposure, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid was more persistent than the remaining insecticides.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- imidaclopride2
- Outcome
- persistente2
- Direction
- moree2
- Comparator
- the remaining insecticidese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e2“which indicated that imidacloprid was more persistent followed by acetamiprid and dimethoate than the remaining insecticides”
Claim · model-written summary
Product of toxicity of the seven insecticides at 24 and 48 hours was ordered from imidacloprid down to chlorfenapyr.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Interactor
- A. craccivora
Aphis craccivorae0pest - Outcome
- PT (product of toxicity)e3
- Qualifier
- Imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dimethoate, thiamethoxam, diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyre3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
t0“Persistent toxicity of selected insecticides on cowpea aphid”
e0“was conducted against cowpea aphid A. craccivora, using pot culture in the green house”
e3“The PT (product of toxicity) of test insecticides were in the order: Imidacloprid, acetamiprid, dimethoate, thiamethoxam, diafenthiuron, spiromesifen and chlorfenapyr”
The same questions in other papers
dimethoate · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
acetamiprid · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
chlorfenapyr · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · Aphis craccivora · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.