Paper · 2023 · Heliyon

Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement: Selecting variety, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and bioregulator as a first-line treatment

Belete Desalegn; Erana Kebede; Hirpa Legesse; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
42
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The improvement of sugarcane productivity depends on the crop varieties, growth environments, and management practices. In particular, the selection of the most productive variety and the use of an optimal fertilizer rate and plant bioregulator are critical for increasing sugarcane productivity and sugar yield. This study aimed to determine the high-performing sugarcane variety, optimal nitrogen rate, and potential bioregulator for improved sugarcane production, juice quality, and sugar yield. Two sugarcane varieties (D42/58 and NCo-334), three nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates (0, 100, and 150 kg/ha), and two bioregulators (Agrostemin and Crops®) were used for the study. The study revealed that sugarcane variety had a significant effect on all growth, yield, and quality parameters. Plant height was significantly influenced by variety and bioregulators, while stalk population was significantly influenced by two- and three-way interactions of varieties, bioregulators, and N fertilizer rates. Cane weight was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer rate, and bioregulators, whereas cane yield was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer, and their interaction effects. Sugar yield was similarly influenced by variety, bioregulator, and their interaction. The three main factors, as well as their two- and three-way interactions, had a considerable influence on cane quality parameters. Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively. The use of the D42/58 variety with N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulator also led to higher performance in cane population (107126), cane yield (153.34 tons/ha), Pol % (15.81%), and sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha). Most sugarcane growth, yield, juice quality, and sugar yield parameters were positively correlated; hence, high-performing varieties, appropriate N rates, and plant bioregulators could boost sugarcane productivity and sugar yield. Overall, the selection and combination of sugarcane variety D42/58 with 100 kg N/ha and/or Agrostemin bioregulator could maximize sugarcane production, juice quality, and sugar yield. To confirm the current findings, however, more research needs to be conducted across different agroecologies and seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety had a significant effect on all growth, yield and quality parameters.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
sugarcane varietye1
Outcome
all growth, yield, and quality parameterse1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“The study revealed that sugarcane variety had a significant effect on all growth, yield, and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was significantly influenced by variety and bioregulators.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
varietye2
Treatment
bioregulatorse2
Outcome
Plant heighte2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant height was significantly influenced by variety and bioregulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–860 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk population was significantly influenced by two- and three-way interactions of varieties, bioregulators and N fertilizer rates.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
varietiese3
Treatment
N fertilizer ratese3
Outcome
stalk populatione3
Qualifier
two- and three-way interactionse3

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“stalk population was significantly influenced by two- and three-way interactions of varieties, bioregulators, and N fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1000 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane weight was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer rate and bioregulators.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
varietye4
Treatment
N fertilizer ratee4
Outcome
Cane weighte4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cane weight was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer rate, and bioregulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1089 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane yield was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer and their interaction.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
varietye5
Treatment
N fertilizere5
Outcome
cane yielde5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“cane yield was significantly affected by variety, N fertilizer, and their interaction effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield was similarly influenced by variety, bioregulator and their interaction.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
varietye6
Treatment
bioregulatore6
Outcome
Sugar yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sugar yield was similarly influenced by variety, bioregulator, and their interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1278 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three main factors and their two- and three-way interactions had a considerable influence on cane quality parameters.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
three main factorse7
Outcome
cane quality parameterse7
Qualifier
two- and three-way interactionse7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“The three main factors, as well as their two- and three-way interactions, had a considerable influence on cane quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1409 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed NCo-334 in sprouting by 7.49%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
7.49%e0
Comparator
NCo-334e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1640 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed NCo-334 in number of tillers by 9.50%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
9.50%e0
Comparator
NCo-334e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1640 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed NCo-334 in plant height by 12.80%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
12.80%e0
Comparator
NCo-334e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1640 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed NCo-334 in number of millable canes by 10.50%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e0
Outcome
number of millable canese0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
10.50%e0
Comparator
NCo-334e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1640 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed NCo-334 in sucrose percentage by 9.10%.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e0
Outcome
sucrose percentagee0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
9.10%e0
Comparator
NCo-334e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane variety D42/58 significantly outperformed variety NCo-334 in terms of sprouting, number of tillers, plant height, number of millable canes, and sucrose percentage by 7.49%, 9.50%, 12.80%, 10.50%, and 9.10%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D42/58 with N fertilizer and/or Agrostemin gave higher cane population (107126).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e4
Treatment
N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulatore4
Outcome
cane populatione4
Direction
highere4
Value
107126e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of the D42/58 variety with N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulator also led to higher performance in cane population (107126), cane yield (153.34 tons/ha), Pol % (15.81%), and sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D42/58 with N fertilizer and/or Agrostemin gave higher cane yield (153.34 tons/ha).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e4
Treatment
N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulatore4
Outcome
cane yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
153.34 tons/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of the D42/58 variety with N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulator also led to higher performance in cane population (107126), cane yield (153.34 tons/ha), Pol % (15.81%), and sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D42/58 with N fertilizer and/or Agrostemin gave higher Pol % (15.81%).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e4
Treatment
N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulatore4
Outcome
Pol %e4
Direction
highere4
Value
15.81%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of the D42/58 variety with N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulator also led to higher performance in cane population (107126), cane yield (153.34 tons/ha), Pol % (15.81%), and sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D42/58 with N fertilizer and/or Agrostemin gave higher sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Material
D42/58e4
Treatment
N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulatore4
Outcome
sugar yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
10.25 tons/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“The use of the D42/58 variety with N fertilizer (at 100 kg/ha) and/or the Agrostemin bioregulator also led to higher performance in cane population (107126), cane yield (153.34 tons/ha), Pol % (15.81%), and sugar yield (10.25 tons/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane growth, yield, juice quality and sugar yield parameters were positively correlated.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
growth, yield, juice quality, and sugar yield parameterse5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“Most sugarcane growth, yield, juice quality, and sugar yield parameters were positively correlated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1976 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High-performing varieties, appropriate N rates and plant bioregulators could boost sugarcane productivity and sugar yield.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
sugarcane productivity and sugar yielde6

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“high-performing varieties, appropriate N rates, and plant bioregulators could boost sugarcane productivity and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting variety D42/58 with 100 kg N/ha and/or Agrostemin could maximize sugarcane production, juice quality and sugar yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee7
Outcome
sugarcane production, juice quality, and sugar yielde7

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane productivity and sugar yield improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“the selection and combination of sugarcane variety D42/58 with 100 kg N/ha and/or Agrostemin bioregulator could maximize sugarcane production, juice quality, and sugar yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2291 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

104 papers: 91 positive, 13 negative or no effect

90 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.