Paper · 2015 · Bragantia

Interaction between N-fertilizer and water availability on borer-rot complex in sugarcane

Luiz Eduardo da Rocha Pannuti; Edson Luiz Lopes Baldin; Glauber José de Castro Gava; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of nitrogen availability in fertigation and rainfed management, as well as their interactions with the incidence of and damage caused by D. saccharalis and red rot in sugarcane. The experiment consisted of four treatments (0 and 150 kg ha–1 of N-fertilizer with irrigation; 0 and 150 kg ha–1 of N-fertilizer in rainfed management) in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The evaluated parameters were the number of holes and internodes with red rot per meter of cultivation, stalk yield and sugar content. In the laboratory (T = 25 ± 2 °C; R.H. = 70 ± 10%: 12:12-L:D), we evaluated the attractiveness and consumption of fragments of stalks from the different treatments for fourth instar larvae through choice and no-choice tests in a randomized complete block design with ten replications. Nitrogen fertilization via irrigation has favorable effects on borer-rot complex and leads to higher gains in stalk and sugar yields when compared to rainfed management. The increments of stalk and sugar yields due to nitrogen fertilization compensates for the increase in borer-rot complex infestation. In laboratory tests, D. saccharalis larvae were similarly attracted to all treatments regardless of the doses of N-fertilizer or the water regimes evaluated. However, fragments of sugarcane stalks produced with nitrogen fertilization were consumed more by D. saccharalis in both water regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertigation increased stalk yield relative to rainfed management.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization via irrigatione0
Outcome
stalke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rainfed managemente0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fertilization via irrigation has favorable effects on borer-rot complex and leads to higher gains in stalk and sugar yields when compared to rainfed management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertigation increased sugar yield relative to rainfed management.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization via irrigatione0
Outcome
sugar yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rainfed managemente0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen fertilization via irrigation has favorable effects on borer-rot complex and leads to higher gains in stalk and sugar yields when compared to rainfed management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased borer-rot infestation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
borer-rot complex infestatione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increments of stalk and sugar yields due to nitrogen fertilization compensates for the increase in borer-rot complex infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. saccharalis larvae were similarly attracted to stalks across nitrogen doses and water regimes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
doses of N-fertilizere0
Interactor
D. saccharalise0pest
Outcome
D. saccharalis larvae were similarly attractede0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
water regimes evaluatede0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“D. saccharalis larvae were similarly attracted to all treatments regardless of the doses of N-fertilizer or the water regimes evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. saccharalis consumed more nitrogen-fertilized sugarcane stalk tissue in both water regimes.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Interactor
D. saccharalise0pest
Outcome
consumed more by D. saccharalise0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
both water regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“fragments of sugarcane stalks produced with nitrogen fertilization were consumed more by D. saccharalis in both water regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1451 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.