Paper · 2023 · Scientific Reports

The combination of multiple plant growth promotion and hydrolytic enzyme producing rhizobacteria and their effect on Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement

Natthawat Sritongon; Sophon Boonlue; Wiyada Mongkolthanaruk; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rhizobacteria are well recognized for their beneficial multifunctions as key promoters of plant development, suppressing pathogens, and improving soil health. In this study, experiments focused on characterizing the plant growth promotion (PGP) and extracellular hydrolase production traits of rhizobacteria, and their impact on Jerusalem artichoke growth. A total of 50 isolates proved capable of either direct PGP or hydrolase-producing traits. Two promising strains (Enterobacter cloacae S81 and Pseudomonas azotoformans C2-114) showed potential on phosphate and potassium solubilization, IAA production, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity and hydrolase production. A hydrolase-producing strain (Bacillus subtilis S42) was able to generate cellulase, protease, amylase, β-glucosidase, and phosphatase. These three selected strains also gave positive results for indirect PGP traits such as siderophore, ammonia, oxalate oxidase, polyamine, exopolysaccharide, biofilm, motility, and tolerance to salinity and drought stress. Colonization was observed using a scanning electron microscope and rhizobacteria appeared at the root surface. Interestingly, inoculation with consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114) significantly increased all plant parameters, including height, biomass, root (length, surface, diameter, and volume), and tuber fresh weight. Therefore, we recommend that potential consortia of PGP and hydrolase-producing rhizobacteria be employed as a biofertilizer to improve soil and boost crop productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty isolates had plant growth promotion or hydrolase traits.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
direct PGP or hydrolase-producing traitse0
Value
50 isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 50 isolates proved capable of either direct PGP or hydrolase-producing traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterobacter cloacae S81 and Pseudomonas azotoformans C2-114 showed phosphate and potassium solubilization and IAA production.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Interactor
Enterobacter cloacae S81Enterobacter cloacaee0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas azotoformans C2-114Pseudomonas azotoformanse0symbiont
Outcome
phosphate and potassium solubilization, IAA productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter cloacae
Enterobacter cloacae · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two promising strains (Enterobacter cloacae S81 and Pseudomonas azotoformans C2-114) showed potential on phosphate and potassium solubilization, IAA production, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity and hydrolase production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis S42 generated five named hydrolases.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis S42Bacillus subtilise0symbiont
Outcome
cellulase, protease, amylase, β-glucosidase, and phosphatasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus subtilis S42) was able to generate cellulase, protease, amylase, β-glucosidase, and phosphatase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three selected strains showed indirect growth promotion and stress tolerance traits.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
indirect PGP traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These three selected strains also gave positive results for indirect PGP traits such as siderophore, ammonia, oxalate oxidase, polyamine, exopolysaccharide, biofilm, motility, and tolerance to salinity and drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria colonized the root surface.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Organ / stage
root surfacee0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
rhizobacteria appeared at the root surfacee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization was observed using a scanning electron microscope and rhizobacteria appeared at the root surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation significantly increased height and biomass.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
inoculation with consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114)e0
Interactor
consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114)e0symbiont
Outcome
height, biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114) significantly increased all plant parameters, including height, biomass, root (length, surface, diameter, and volume), and tuber fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium inoculation significantly increased root dimensions and tuber fresh weight.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Treatment
inoculation with consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114)e0
Interactor
consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114)e0symbiont
Outcome
root (length, surface, diameter, and volume), and tuber fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with consortia strains (S42, S81, and C2-114) significantly increased all plant parameters, including height, biomass, root (length, surface, diameter, and volume), and tuber fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rhizobacterial consortia as biofertilizer.

Taxon
Jerusalem artichokeHelianthus tuberosust0
Outcome
potential consortia of PGP and hydrolase-producing rhizobacteria be employed as a biofertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we recommend that potential consortia of PGP and hydrolase-producing rhizobacteria be employed as a biofertilizer to improve soil and boost crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jerusalem artichoke growth improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–155 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.