Paper · 2021 · Journal of Fungi

Co-Inoculation of an Endophytic and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus Improve Growth and Yield of Helianthus tuberosus L. under Field Condition

Saranya Khaekhum; Jindarat Ekprasert; Thanapat Suebrasri; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Endophytic fungi (EPF) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) symbioses can promote the growth and productivity of several types of plants. This work aimed to investigate the effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer (15–15–15) under field conditions. Several plant growth parameters of the co-inoculated plants were significantly higher than the other treatments. Remarkably, such an effect was relatively equal to that of the full-dose chemical fertilizers. Moreover, the co-inoculation of EPF and AMF significantly improved the tuber yield production, even better than the use of a chemical fertilizer. This is the first report to show that plant growth promoting effects of the co-inoculation of EPF and AMF were exceptionally greater than those of the chemical fertilizer. Therefore, our EPF and AMF could potentially be used as a biofertilizer for promoting the growth and yield of sunchoke in the fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated sunchoke plants had significantly higher growth parameters than the other treatments under field conditions.

Taxon
sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)Helianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0
Interactor
Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5Exserohilum rostratume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth parameterse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
the other treatmentse2
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum rostratum
Exserohilum rostratum · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–415 · show in text ↑
e1

“under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–449 · show in text ↑
e2

“Several plant growth parameters of the co-inoculated plants were significantly higher than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth effect of co-inoculation was relatively equal to that of full-dose chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)Helianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0
Interactor
Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5Exserohilum rostratume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0symbiont
Outcome
such an effecte3
Direction
relatively equale3
Comparator
full-dose chemical fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum rostratum
Exserohilum rostratum · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–415 · show in text ↑
e3

“Remarkably, such an effect was relatively equal to that of the full-dose chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of EPF and AMF significantly improved sunchoke tuber yield, more than chemical fertilizer did.

Taxon
sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)Helianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
co-inoculation of EPF and AMFe4
Interactor
Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5Exserohilum rostratume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0symbiont
Outcome
tuber yield productione4
Direction
improvede4
Comparator
a chemical fertilizere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum rostratum
Exserohilum rostratum · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–415 · show in text ↑
e4

“the co-inoculation of EPF and AMF significantly improved the tuber yield production, even better than the use of a chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-promoting effects of co-inoculation were greater than those of chemical fertilizer in sunchoke.

Taxon
sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)Helianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
co-inoculation of EPF and AMFe5
Interactor
Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5Exserohilum rostratume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth promoting effectse5
Direction
greatere5
Qualifier
exceptionallye5
Comparator
the chemical fertilizere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum rostratum
Exserohilum rostratum · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–415 · show in text ↑
e5

“plant growth promoting effects of the co-inoculation of EPF and AMF were exceptionally greater than those of the chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–975 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The endophytic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi could potentially be used as a biofertilizer to promote sunchoke growth and yield in fields.

Taxon
sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)Helianthus tuberosuse0
Treatment
biofertilizere6
Interactor
Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5Exserohilum rostratume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5e0symbiont
Outcome
growth and yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus tuberosus
Helianthus tuberosus · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Exserohilum rostratum
Exserohilum rostratum · InteractorCDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of co-inoculation of an EPF Exserohilum rostratum NMS1.5 and an AMF Glomus etunicatum UDCN52867 g.5 on the growth and yields of sunchoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) compared to the effects of full-dose and half-dose chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–415 · show in text ↑
e6

“our EPF and AMF could potentially be used as a biofertilizer for promoting the growth and yield of sunchoke in the fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1109 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.