Paper · 2023 · Pest Management Science

Residues of pesticide co‐formulants in lettuce and parsley: Identification of decline processes using field trials in different cropping systems

Marianne E. Balmer; Daniel Janser; Ulrich Schaller; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although co-formulants constitute a substantial portion of the total plant protection product (PPP) mass applied to crops, data on residue formation and the behaviour of these substances on plants are scarce. In an earlier study we demonstrated that co-formulants commonly used in PPPs can form considerable residues, i.e., in the low to medium mg/kg range, but normally decline rapidly within few days. In the field trial reported here, we aimed to identify the major decline processes of co-formulants. Residues of co-formulants were therefore monitored in parsley and lettuce grown in an open field as well as under foil tunnels equipped with either an overhead or a drip irrigation system. RESULTS: Dissipation of three anionic surfactants was markedly faster when crops (parsley and lettuce) were exposed to natural rainfall or irrigation from above compared to drip irrigation. In contrast, the decline of three volatile organic solvents was not affected by rain or irrigation, but was dependent on the crop, with much shorter half-lives in lettuce than in parsley. Furthermore, dilution through plant growth contributed significantly to the reduction of residues over time. CONCLUSION: In this work we substantiate earlier findings on the magnitude and dissipation of residues of anionic surfactants and solvents representing the most important co-formulant classes. The chosen experimental setup allowed differentiation between decline processes and we confirm that foliar wash-off is a major dissipation process for anionic surfactants. For volatile organic solvents, dissipation appears to depend on the properties not only of the substance but also of the plant (surface). © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall or overhead irrigation accelerated anionic surfactant dissipation in parsley and lettuce relative to drip irrigation.

Taxon
parsley and lettucePetroselinum crispumLactuca sativae0
Treatment
natural rainfall or irrigation from abovee0
Outcome
Dissipation of three anionic surfactantse0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dissipation of three anionic surfactants was markedly faster when crops (parsley and lettuce) were exposed to natural rainfall or irrigation from above compared to drip irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rain or irrigation did not affect volatile solvent decline.

Taxon
lettuce and parsleyPetroselinum crispumLactuca sativat0
Treatment
rain or irrigatione0
Outcome
decline of three volatile organic solventse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decline of three volatile organic solvents was not affected by rain or irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and parsley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile solvent half-lives were shorter in lettuce than parsley.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
half-livese0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
parsleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“much shorter half-lives in lettuce than in parsley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1082 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth dilution significantly reduced residues over time.

Taxon
lettuce and parsleyPetroselinum crispumLactuca sativat0
Outcome
reduction of residuese0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
dilution through plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dilution through plant growth contributed significantly to the reduction of residues over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce and parsley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–58 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.