Paper · 2022 · Plant Genetic Resources

Identification of yield contributing traits and genotypes to drought tolerance in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.)

Y. A. Nanja Reddy

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Screening of germplasm for specific traits is a continuous pre-breeding process in deriving the drought-tolerant donors required for crop improvement. The study evaluated 17 medium-late duration finger millet genotypes under drought stress (DS) for 28 days during the reproductive stage to identify the traits and genotypes for drought tolerance using different statistical analysis. The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS, but the leaf temperature was increased (4.7%). From the path analysis and multiple linear regression analysis, the mean ear weight and productive tillers were found to contribute to the grain yield significantly under well-watered conditions. While under DS conditions, the mean ear weight, productive tillers and threshing percentage equally contributed to grain yield. Based on the ranking of traits significantly contributing to grain yield, the genotype GE-4683 with a higher mean ear weight (10.65 g) was found superior to the popular variety, GPU-28. The Multiple linear regression equation predicts the possibility to increase the yield of GPU-28 under DS from the existing 360.0 to 459.5 g per square metre (by 29.1%) by the incorporation of three productive tillers instead of the existing two tillers per plant in the MLR equation. An additional 1.0 g of mean ear weight will be able to predict an increased grain yield from 360.0 to 392.0 gm −2 , equivalent to 3.60 to 3.92 t/ha (by 9.4%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced photosynthetic rate by 26.3%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
26.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced stomatal conductance by 26.4%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
26.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced transpiration rate by 24.8%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced grain yield by 13.2%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased leaf temperature by 4.7%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DSe0
Outcome
leaf temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate (by 26.3%), stomatal conductance (by 26.4%), transpiration rate (by 24.8%) and grain yield (by 13.2%) were decreased and found sensitive to DS, but the leaf temperature was increased (4.7%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–607 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean ear weight and productive tillers contributed significantly to yield when well watered.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Organ / stage
eare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
well-watered conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean ear weight and productive tillers were found to contribute to the grain yield significantly under well-watered conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought, mean ear weight, productive tillers and threshing percentage contributed equally to yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
DS conditionse0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under DS conditions, the mean ear weight, productive tillers and threshing percentage equally contributed to grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GE-4683 had higher mean ear weight than GPU-28, at 10.65 g.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
GE-4683e0
Outcome
mean ear weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.65 ge0
Comparator
GPU-28e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype GE-4683 with a higher mean ear weight (10.65 g) was found superior to the popular variety, GPU-28.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Model predicted GPU-28 yield could rise from 360.0 to 459.5 g per square metre with three instead of two productive tillers.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
GPU-28e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29.1%e0
Comparator
existing two tillers per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predicts the possibility to increase the yield of GPU-28 under DS from the existing 360.0 to 459.5 g per square metre (by 29.1%) by the incorporation of three productive tillers instead of the existing two tillers per plant in the MLR equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Model predicted a 1.0 g increase in mean ear weight would increase yield by 9.4%.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.4%e0
Comparator
360.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An additional 1.0 g of mean ear weight will be able to predict an increased grain yield from 360.0 to 392.0 gm −2 , equivalent to 3.60 to 3.92 t/ha (by 9.4%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–95 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.