Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Utilization of soil and fertilizer nitrogen supply under mulched drip irrigation with various water qualities in arid regions

Chao Ma; Jun Wang; Jiusheng Li

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Upgrading the efficiency of native soil nitrogen (N) and balancing the N derived from soil and fertilizers under drip irrigation with low-quality water is crucial for reducing N application and curtailing environmental degradation in arid regions. In this study, a control experiment with four N (15N-labeled urea) rates of 0 (F0), 255 (F1), 315 (F2) and 375 kg·ha−1 (F3) was established by applying groundwater (Q1, 1.27 g·l−1), brackish water (Q2, 3.03 g·l−1) and saline water (Q3, 4.90 g·l−1) to differentiate cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake from native soil N and fertilizer N by 15N tracer technology. The results indicated that increasing water salinity increased the soil salt content and significantly reduced cotton biomass. The cumulative utilization percentages of soil N (CUSN) and fertilizer N (CUFN) ranged from 7.4% to 14.1% and 35.9–54.5%, respectively, during the growing season. The CUFN decreased with increasing irrigation water salinity. Appropriate nitrogen fertilizer alleviated the salt stress on N uptake. The N rate of 315 kg·ha−1 promoted soil N and fertilizer N uptake and produced higher percentages of utilization of soil N (PUSN) and fertilizer N (PUFN) during the squaring and flower boll stage under Q1 and Q2 irrigation. An N rate of 375 kg·ha−1 significantly increased PUSN under Q3 irrigation, particularly during the mature stage. In addition, high salinity water and N rates caused a larger fertilizer N loss. Considering cotton growth and balance between soil N and fertilizer N, an N rate of 315 kg·ha−1 was suitable for cotton under mulched drip irrigation when applying Q1 and Q2 in arid regions, and 375 kg·ha−1 was recommended for Q3 irrigation. The appropriate addition of nitrogen fertilizer during the flower boll stage will promote cotton growth under brackish water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced cotton biomass significantly.

Treatment
increasing water salinitye0
Outcome
cotton biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity increased the soil salt content and significantly reduced cotton biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity raised soil salt content.

Treatment
increasing water salinitye0
Outcome
soil salt contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing water salinity increased the soil salt content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative soil N utilization ranged from 7.4% to 14.1%.

Outcome
cumulative utilization percentages of soil N (CUSN)e0
Value
7.4% to 14.1%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative utilization percentages of soil N (CUSN) and fertilizer N (CUFN) ranged from 7.4% to 14.1% and 35.9–54.5%, respectively, during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative fertilizer N utilization ranged from 35.9–54.5%.

Outcome
fertilizer N (CUFN)e0
Value
35.9–54.5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cumulative utilization percentages of soil N (CUSN) and fertilizer N (CUFN) ranged from 7.4% to 14.1% and 35.9–54.5%, respectively, during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N utilization declined with increasing irrigation water salinity.

Treatment
increasing irrigation water salinitye0
Outcome
CUFNe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CUFN decreased with increasing irrigation water salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Appropriate fertilizer alleviated salt stress on nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
Appropriate nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
salt stress on N uptakee0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Appropriate nitrogen fertilizer alleviated the salt stress on N uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

315 kg·ha−1 promoted soil and fertilizer N uptake under Q1 and Q2.

Organ / stage
squaring and flower boll stagee0
Treatment
N rate of 315 kg·ha−1e0
Outcome
soil N and fertilizer N uptakee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
under Q1 and Q2 irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate of 315 kg·ha−1 promoted soil N and fertilizer N uptake and produced higher percentages of utilization of soil N (PUSN) and fertilizer N (PUFN) during the squaring and flower boll stage under Q1 and Q2 irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

315 kg·ha−1 gave higher PUSN and PUFN under Q1 and Q2.

Organ / stage
squaring and flower boll stagee0
Treatment
N rate of 315 kg·ha−1e0
Outcome
percentages of utilization of soil N (PUSN) and fertilizer N (PUFN)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N rate of 315 kg·ha−1 promoted soil N and fertilizer N uptake and produced higher percentages of utilization of soil N (PUSN) and fertilizer N (PUFN) during the squaring and flower boll stage under Q1 and Q2 irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

375 kg·ha−1 significantly increased PUSN under Q3.

Organ / stage
mature stagee0
Treatment
N rate of 375 kg·ha−1e0
Outcome
PUSNe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under Q3 irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An N rate of 375 kg·ha−1 significantly increased PUSN under Q3 irrigation, particularly during the mature stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High salinity water and N rates caused larger fertilizer N loss.

Treatment
high salinity water and N ratese0
Outcome
fertilizer N losse0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high salinity water and N rates caused a larger fertilizer N loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 315 kg·ha−1 under Q1 and Q2.

Treatment
Q1 and Q2e0
Outcome
N rate of 315 kg·ha−1e0
Setting
arid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an N rate of 315 kg·ha−1 was suitable for cotton under mulched drip irrigation when applying Q1 and Q2 in arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1643 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 375 kg·ha−1 under Q3.

Treatment
Q3 irrigatione0
Outcome
375 kg·ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“375 kg·ha−1 was recommended for Q3 irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adding nitrogen at flower boll stage under brackish water.

Outcome
addition of nitrogen fertilizer during the flower boll stagee0
Qualifier
under brackish watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The appropriate addition of nitrogen fertilizer during the flower boll stage will promote cotton growth under brackish water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1821 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

salinity · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 16 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.