Paper · 2023 · Agriculture

Properties of Nano-Amendments and Their Effect on Some Soil Properties and Root-Knot Nematode and Yield Attributes of Tomato Plant

Asmaa Khader; Mahmoud Ibrahim; Fahad Alkhathami; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of green nano-amendments is a promising approach for improving soil health and providing sustainable options to reduce root-knot nematodes (RKN) and thus increase yields. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to identify the characteristics of nano-amendments such as nanobiochar (nB), green nanobiochar (GnB), and magnetic nanobiochar (MnB) and their effect on the root-knot nematodes and tomato yield at levels of 3 and 6 mg kg−1 in sandy loam soil. The results showed that the GnB and MnB contain many functional groups (such as O-H, C=C, S-H, H-C=O, C-O, and H–O–H) and minerals (such as magnetite, ferrous sulfate monohydrate, and quartz), and they also had an elevated specific surface area. The application of the investigated soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and decreased the root-knot nematodes, playing a major role in increasing tomato growth. The highest significant values of OM and MBC were found in the soil amended by GnB at 6 mg kg−1, with increases of 84.7% and 71.5% as compared to the control, respectively. GnB6 significantly decreased the number of root galls, the egg mass, and number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soil by 77.67, 88.65, and 74.46%, respectively, compared to the control. Green nanobiochar was more efficient in accelerating the growth and yield components of the tomato plant. The addition of GnB is an effective strategy and an environmentally friendly technology to control plant parasitic nematodes and increase tomato yield. Therefore, the results recommend adding GnB at a rate of 6 mg kg−1 in sandy loam soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB contained multiple functional groups and minerals and had elevated specific surface area.

Treatment
GnBe0
Outcome
functional groupse0
Qualifier
elevated specific surface areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the GnB and MnB contain many functional groups (such as O-H, C=C, S-H, H-C=O, C-O, and H–O–H) and minerals (such as magnetite, ferrous sulfate monohydrate, and quartz), and they also had an elevated specific surface area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MnB contained multiple functional groups and minerals and had elevated specific surface area.

Treatment
MnBe0
Outcome
functional groupse0
Qualifier
elevated specific surface areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the GnB and MnB contain many functional groups (such as O-H, C=C, S-H, H-C=O, C-O, and H–O–H) and minerals (such as magnetite, ferrous sulfate monohydrate, and quartz), and they also had an elevated specific surface area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM).

Treatment
soil nano-amendmentse0
Outcome
soil organic matter (OM)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the investigated soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and decreased the root-knot nematodes, playing a major role in increasing tomato growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nano-amendments significantly increased microbial biomass carbon (MBC).

Treatment
soil nano-amendmentse0
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon (MBC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the investigated soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and decreased the root-knot nematodes, playing a major role in increasing tomato growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nano-amendments decreased root-knot nematodes.

Treatment
soil nano-amendmentse0
Interactor
root-knot nematodesMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
root-knot nematodese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the investigated soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and decreased the root-knot nematodes, playing a major role in increasing tomato growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nano-amendments increased tomato growth.

Treatment
soil nano-amendmentse0
Outcome
tomato growthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the investigated soil nano-amendments significantly increased soil organic matter (OM) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and decreased the root-knot nematodes, playing a major role in increasing tomato growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB at 6 mg kg−1 increased soil OM by 84.7% versus control.

Treatment
GnB at 6 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
OMe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
84.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest significant values of OM and MBC were found in the soil amended by GnB at 6 mg kg−1, with increases of 84.7% and 71.5% as compared to the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB at 6 mg kg−1 increased soil MBC by 71.5% versus control.

Treatment
GnB at 6 mg kg−1e0
Outcome
MBCe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
71.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest significant values of OM and MBC were found in the soil amended by GnB at 6 mg kg−1, with increases of 84.7% and 71.5% as compared to the control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB6 reduced number of root galls by 77.67% versus control.

Treatment
GnB6e0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
number of root gallse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
77.67e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GnB6 significantly decreased the number of root galls, the egg mass, and number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soil by 77.67, 88.65, and 74.46%, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB6 reduced egg mass by 88.65% versus control.

Treatment
GnB6e0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
egg masse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
88.65e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GnB6 significantly decreased the number of root galls, the egg mass, and number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soil by 77.67, 88.65, and 74.46%, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GnB6 reduced number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soil by 74.46% versus control.

Treatment
GnB6e0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soile0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
74.46e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GnB6 significantly decreased the number of root galls, the egg mass, and number of nematodes per 250 cm3 soil by 77.67, 88.65, and 74.46%, respectively, compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green nanobiochar accelerated tomato growth and yield components more efficiently.

Treatment
Green nanobiochare0
Outcome
growth and yield componentse0
Direction
more efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green nanobiochar was more efficient in accelerating the growth and yield components of the tomato plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1398 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend GnB at 6 mg kg−1 in sandy loam soil.

Outcome
adding GnB at a rate of 6 mg kg−1e0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the results recommend adding GnB at a rate of 6 mg kg−1 in sandy loam soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 54 positive, 2 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.