Paper · 2019 · Journal of Nanotechnology Research

Essential Metal-Based Nanoparticles (Copper/Iron NPs) as Potent Nematicidal Agents against Meloidogyne spp.

Gkanatsiou Ch; Ntalli N; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause great economic impact in the sector of agriculture while the number of existing commercial nematicides has been drastically reduced. The metal-based nanoparticles offer new possibilities as agrochemicals. In the current study, we shed light on the role of copper/iron based nanoparticles as bioactive agents against the root knot nematode Meloidogyne spp; along with the plant enhancement properties on the nematode infested host. Same sized PEGylated Cu, CuFe and CuFeO2 NPs, were solvothermally synthesized characterized and evaluated against M. incognita and M. javanica nematodes, in terms of paralysis and biological cycle arrest in tomato plants. Comparisons were made against the commercial nematicide fosthiazate. All the tested compositions revealed nematicidal activity, but CuFe NPs were found best effective exhibiting the lowest EC50 value calculated at 0.03 μg ai g/soil. Additionally, a fresh shoot and root weight increase was evident in tomato plants treated with CuFe NPs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuFe nanoparticles were the most effective against Meloidogyne spp, with the lowest EC50 of 0.03 μg ai g/soil among the tested compositions.

Treatment
CuFe NPse2
Interactor
Meloidogyne sppMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
EC50 valuee2
Direction
loweste2
Value
0.03 μg ai g/soile2
Comparator
the tested compositionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause great economic impact in the sector of agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Same sized PEGylated Cu, CuFe and CuFeO2 NPs, were solvothermally synthesized characterized and evaluated against M. incognita and M. javanica nematodes, in terms of paralysis and biological cycle arrest in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–696 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the tested compositions revealed nematicidal activity, but CuFe NPs were found best effective exhibiting the lowest EC50 value calculated at 0.03 μg ai g/soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PEGylated Cu, CuFe and CuFeO2 nanoparticles all showed nematicidal activity, compared with the commercial nematicide fosthiazate.

Treatment
PEGylated Cu, CuFe and CuFeO2 NPse1
Interactor
Meloidogyne sppMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
nematicidal activitye2
Comparator
commercial nematicide fosthiazatee3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) cause great economic impact in the sector of agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Same sized PEGylated Cu, CuFe and CuFeO2 NPs, were solvothermally synthesized characterized and evaluated against M. incognita and M. javanica nematodes, in terms of paralysis and biological cycle arrest in tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–696 · show in text ↑
e2

“All the tested compositions revealed nematicidal activity, but CuFe NPs were found best effective exhibiting the lowest EC50 value calculated at 0.03 μg ai g/soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–929 · show in text ↑
e3

“Comparisons were made against the commercial nematicide fosthiazate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuFe nanoparticles increased fresh shoot and root weight of tomato plants.

Treatment
CuFe NPse4
Outcome
fresh shoot and root weighte4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Additionally, a fresh shoot and root weight increase was evident in tomato plants treated with CuFe NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1034 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nanoparticle · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.