Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Nitrogen addition alters soil fungal communities, but root fungal communities are resistant to change

Alyssa A. Carrell; Brittany B. Hicks; Emilie Sidelinger; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plants are colonized by numerous microorganisms serving important symbiotic functions that are vital to plant growth and success. Understanding and harnessing these interactions will be useful in both managed and natural ecosystems faced with global change, but it is still unclear how variation in environmental conditions and soils influence the trajectory of these interactions. In this study, we examine how nitrogen addition alters plant-fungal interactions within two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa . In this experiment, we manipulated plant host, starting soil (native vs. away for each tree species), and nitrogen addition in a fully factorial replicated design. After ~10 weeks of growth, we destructively harvested the plants and characterized plant growth factors and the soil and root endosphere fungal communities using targeted amplicon sequencing of the ITS2 gene region. Overall, we found nitrogen addition altered plant growth factors, e.g., plant height, chlorophyll density, and plant N content. Interestingly, nitrogen addition resulted in a lower fungal alpha diversity in soils but not plant roots. Further, there was an interactive effect of tree species, soil origin, and nitrogen addition on soil fungal community composition. Starting soils collected from Oregon and West Virginia were dominated by the ectomycorrhizal fungi Inocybe (55.8% relative abundance), but interestingly when P . deltoides was grown in its native West Virginia soil, the roots selected for a high abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Rhizophagus . These results highlight the importance of soil origin and plant species on establishing plant-fungal interactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition altered Populus growth factors including plant height, chlorophyll density and plant N content.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
nitrogen additione1
Outcome
plant growth factorse1
Qualifier
plant height, chlorophyll density, and plant N contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, we found nitrogen addition altered plant growth factors, e.g., plant height, chlorophyll density, and plant N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition lowered fungal alpha diversity in soils.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
nitrogen additione2
Outcome
fungal alpha diversity in soilse2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen addition resulted in a lower fungal alpha diversity in soils but not plant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition did not change fungal alpha diversity in plant roots.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Organ / stage
plant rootse2
Treatment
nitrogen additione2
Outcome
fungal alpha diversitye2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen addition resulted in a lower fungal alpha diversity in soils but not plant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1147 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fungal community composition depended on an interaction of tree species, soil origin and nitrogen addition.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Treatment
nitrogen additione3
Outcome
soil fungal community compositione3
Qualifier
interactive effect of tree species, soil origine3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e3

“there was an interactive effect of tree species, soil origin, and nitrogen addition on soil fungal community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1278 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starting soils from Oregon and West Virginia were dominated by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Inocybe, at 55.8% relative abundance.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Interactor
InocybeInocybee4symbiont
Outcome
relative abundancee4
Value
55.8%e4
Setting
Oregon and West Virginiae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Inocybe
Inocybe · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Eric Steinert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e4

“Starting soils collected from Oregon and West Virginia were dominated by the ectomycorrhizal fungi Inocybe (55.8% relative abundance)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of P. deltoides grown in its native West Virginia soil selected for a high abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus.

Taxon
PopulusPopuluse0
Material
P . deltoidese5
Organ / stage
rootse5
Interactor
Rhizophaguse5symbiont
Outcome
high abundancee5
Setting
native West Virginia soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two species of Populus - Populus deltoides and P . trichocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–532 · show in text ↑
e5

“when P . deltoides was grown in its native West Virginia soil, the roots selected for a high abundance of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Rhizophagus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1584 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · ecology: diversity · Populus (poplar)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.