Paper · 2023 · Field Crops Research

Heterogeneity effects of plant density and fertilizer application on cowpea grain yield in soil types with different physicochemical characteristics

Kohtaro Iseki; Kenta Ikazaki; Benoit Joseph Batieno

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although high-density cropping and fertilizer application are plausible techniques to improve crop production, there are difficulties in the growth environment that may undermine the positive effects. This study focused on soil types as a major environmental factor of the heterogeneity effects of plant density and fertilizer on grain yield. The objectives were to clarify the responses of grain yield to high plant density and fertilization under soil types with different physicochemical characteristics. Three cowpea genotypes (KVx61-1, KVx421-2J, and Dja) were grown in three dominant soil types in the Sudan Savanna: Ferric Lixisols (LXfr), Petric Plinthisols (PTpt), and Pisoplinthic Petric Plinthosols (PTpt.px). The experiment was conducted two consecutive years in 2018 and 2019. The effect of plant density (31,250 and 62,500 plants ha−1) and fertilizer application (non-fertilizer and fertilizer application at N:P2O5:K2O = 14:23:14 kg ha−1) on grain yields were evaluated. The fertilizer was applied with two different methods: basal dose and split dose. A larger yield increase by high plant density and fertilization was observed for PTpt and PTpt.px than for LXfr. Split dose of fertilizer drastically increased yield when combined with high plant density. However, fertilizer leaching was occurred for split dose applied during the peak of rainy season, which was larger in PTpt and PTpt.px because of higher topsoil permeability. The differences in grain yield among the cowpea varieties were attributed to the shoot growth and flowering date that were differently affected by plant density and fertilization. Excessive moisture stress depressing shoot growth and delaying flowering was a cause of the heterogeneity effects of high plant density and fertilization on grain yield. The stress was more severe in soil of lower topsoil permeability. In contrast, soil types with higher topsoil permeability caused late-season drought for the plants with delayed flowering. Split dose of fertilizer was a strong option for yield increase but the risk of fertilizer leaching should be considered. Genotypic differences in the yield in response to plant density and fertilizer application were presumably influenced by the ability to adapt to excessive soil moisture and drought conditions. Plant density and fertilizer application should be optimized according to the soil type of the target region. Its optimization would help to achieve food security and better economic income of small households of the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High plant density and fertilization increased cowpea yield more on PTpt and PTpt.px soils than on LXfr soil.

Treatment
high plant density and fertilizatione1
Outcome
yield increasee1
Direction
largere1
Comparator
LXfre1
Setting
PTpt and PTpt.pxe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A larger yield increase by high plant density and fertilization was observed for PTpt and PTpt.px than for LXfr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split dose fertilizer drastically increased cowpea yield when combined with high plant density.

Treatment
Split dose of fertilizere2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
when combined with high plant densitye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Split dose of fertilizer drastically increased yield when combined with high plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer leaching was larger for split dose applied during the peak of the rainy season on PTpt and PTpt.px soils.

Treatment
split dose applied during the peak of rainy seasone3
Outcome
fertilizer leachinge3
Direction
largere3
Qualifier
because of higher topsoil permeabilitye3
Setting
PTpt and PTpt.pxe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“However, fertilizer leaching was occurred for split dose applied during the peak of rainy season, which was larger in PTpt and PTpt.px because of higher topsoil permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in cowpea grain yield among varieties were attributed to shoot growth and flowering date.

Outcome
differences in grain yielde4
Qualifier
shoot growth and flowering datee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The differences in grain yield among the cowpea varieties were attributed to the shoot growth and flowering date that were differently affected by plant density and fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1626 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive moisture stress that depressed shoot growth and delayed flowering caused the heterogeneity effects of plant density and fertilization on cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
Excessive moisture stresse5
Outcome
heterogeneity effects of high plant density and fertilization on grain yielde5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Excessive moisture stress depressing shoot growth and delaying flowering was a cause of the heterogeneity effects of high plant density and fertilization on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The moisture stress was more severe in soil of lower topsoil permeability.

Outcome
stresse6
Direction
more severee6
Setting
soil of lower topsoil permeabilitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The stress was more severe in soil of lower topsoil permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1862 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil types with higher topsoil permeability caused late-season drought for cowpea plants with delayed flowering.

Outcome
late-season droughte7
Qualifier
for the plants with delayed floweringe7
Setting
soil types with higher topsoil permeabilitye7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“In contrast, soil types with higher topsoil permeability caused late-season drought for the plants with delayed flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Split dose fertilizer is a strong option for cowpea yield increase.

Treatment
Split dose of fertilizere0
Outcome
yield increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split dose of fertilizer was a strong option for yield increase but the risk of fertilizer leaching should be considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The risk of fertilizer leaching should be considered when applying split-dose fertilizer to cowpea.

Outcome
risk of fertilizer leachinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split dose of fertilizer was a strong option for yield increase but the risk of fertilizer leaching should be considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1987–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density and fertilizer application should be optimized according to the soil type of the target region.

Treatment
Plant density and fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
optimized according to the soil typee1
Setting
soil type of the target regione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Plant density and fertilizer application should be optimized according to the soil type of the target region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2410 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic differences in cowpea yield response to density and fertilizer are presumably due to the ability to adapt to excessive soil moisture and drought.

Outcome
Genotypic differences in the yielde2
Qualifier
ability to adapt to excessive soil moisture and drought conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Genotypic differences in the yield in response to plant density and fertilizer application were presumably influenced by the ability to adapt to excessive soil moisture and drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2109–2300 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 50 positive, 13 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.