Paper · 2023 · Sustainability

The Effect of Grafting on Morphological, Physiological and Molecular Changes Induced by Drought Stress in Cucumber

Ömer Faruk Coşkun

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought is one of the most important abiotic stress factors affecting crop yields and qualities worldwide. One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate. Grafting is recognized as a promising approach to increasing tolerance to abiotic stresses in cucumber. In this study, it is aimed to determine the rootstock that will prevent negative changes in some growth, physiological and genetic parameters of cucumber under drought stress and to determine the mechanism of the system. In drought stress conditions, leaf number values were found to be 6 on average in non-grafted plants and between 6–13.16 in grafted plants. Average leaf fresh weight values (7.56–9.84 g) obtained from grafted plants were higher than non-grafted plants (5.7 g). Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) values were found to be between 24.43 in non-grafted plants and 37.83–55.36 in grafted plants under stress conditions. Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration values also decreased from 5.66 to 3.23–4.36 in grafted plants. It was determined that the genomic template stability (GTS) rate was 64.1% in the non-grafted treatment group. DNA polymorphisms detected by ISSR (inter simple sequence repeat) can be used as a biomarker system for the detection of genotoxic effects of abiotic stresses, such as drought. These findings suggest that grafting with drought-resistant rootstocks may improve drought tolerance in drought-sensitive cucumber genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, grafted cucumber had a higher leaf number (6 to 13.16) than non-grafted plants (average 6).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
leaf numbere1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
6–13.16e1
Comparator
non-grafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“In drought stress conditions, leaf number values were found to be 6 on average in non-grafted plants and between 6–13.16 in grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber under drought had higher leaf fresh weight (7.56–9.84 g) than non-grafted plants (5.7 g).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
leafe2
Treatment
grafted plantse2
Outcome
leaf fresh weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
7.56–9.84 ge2
Comparator
non-grafted plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“Average leaf fresh weight values (7.56–9.84 g) obtained from grafted plants were higher than non-grafted plants (5.7 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought stress, grafted cucumber had higher leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD 37.83–55.36) than non-grafted plants (24.43).

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
grafted plantse3
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD)e3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
37.83–55.36e3
Qualifier
under stress conditionse3
Comparator
non-grafted plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–187 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD) values were found to be between 24.43 in non-grafted plants and 37.83–55.36 in grafted plants under stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In grafted cucumber, malondialdehyde concentration decreased to 3.23–4.36 under drought.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
grafted plantse4
Outcome
Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentratione4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
3.23–4.36e4
Qualifier
from 5.66e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration values also decreased from 5.66 to 3.23–4.36 in grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1024 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genomic template stability rate of non-grafted cucumber under drought was 64.1%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
genomic template stability (GTS) ratee5
Value
64.1%e5
Qualifier
non-grafted treatment groupe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One drought-sensitive plant is the cucumber, which has a high transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–187 · show in text ↑
e5

“It was determined that the genomic template stability (GTS) rate was 64.1% in the non-grafted treatment group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1135 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

drought · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

grafting · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

grafting · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.