Abstract
Abstract Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)-N, N-diethylpropionamide] were compared with 2 standard preemergent herbicides for safety on newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch). Napropamide at rates up to 4.4 kg/ha caused no reduction in stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plants in the first season of growth. There was no adverse effect on fruit yield the following season when compared to hand-weeded controls. The plants responded similarly to the 2 application methods, except that slightly higher yields were obtained when all herbicides were preplant-incorporated.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Napropamide at up to 4.4 kg/ha did not reduce stolon or daughter plant production or daughter plant rooting in the first season.
- Taxon
- Fragaria X ananassa Duch
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- Napropamidee1
- Outcome
- stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plantse1
- Direction
- no reductione1
- Value
- 4.4 kg/hae1
- Qualifier
- first season of growthe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”
e1“Napropamide at rates up to 4.4 kg/ha caused no reduction in stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plants in the first season of growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Napropamide had no adverse effect on strawberry fruit yield the following season compared with hand-weeded controls.
- Taxon
- Fragaria X ananassa Duch
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- napropamidee4
- Outcome
- fruit yielde2
- Direction
- no adverse effecte2
- Qualifier
- the following seasone2
- Comparator
- hand-weeded controlse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”
e2“There was no adverse effect on fruit yield the following season when compared to hand-weeded controls”
e4“Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide”
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant-incorporated application gave slightly higher strawberry yields than post-transplant application.
- Taxon
- Fragaria X ananassa Duch
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- preplant-incorporatede3
- Outcome
- yieldse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Qualifier
- slightlye3
- Comparator
- post-transplant applicationse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”
e3“except that slightly higher yields were obtained when all herbicides were preplant-incorporated”
e4“Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide”
Claim · model-written summary
Plants responded similarly to the two application methods.
- Taxon
- Fragaria X ananassa Duch
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Treatment
- application methodse5
- Outcome
- The plants responded similarlye5
- Direction
- similarlye5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”
e5“The plants responded similarly to the 2 application methods”
The same questions in other papers
napropamide · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.