Paper · 1982 · HortScience

Influence of Napropamide on Strawberry Growth and Fruit Yield1

A. R. Putnam; J. F. Hancock

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide [2-(α-naphthoxyl)-N, N-diethylpropionamide] were compared with 2 standard preemergent herbicides for safety on newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch). Napropamide at rates up to 4.4 kg/ha caused no reduction in stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plants in the first season of growth. There was no adverse effect on fruit yield the following season when compared to hand-weeded controls. The plants responded similarly to the 2 application methods, except that slightly higher yields were obtained when all herbicides were preplant-incorporated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide at up to 4.4 kg/ha did not reduce stolon or daughter plant production or daughter plant rooting in the first season.

Taxon
Fragaria X ananassa DuchFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
Napropamidee1
Outcome
stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plantse1
Direction
no reductione1
Value
4.4 kg/hae1
Qualifier
first season of growthe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–257 · show in text ↑
e1

“Napropamide at rates up to 4.4 kg/ha caused no reduction in stolon or daughter plant production, or in rooting of daughter plants in the first season of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Napropamide had no adverse effect on strawberry fruit yield the following season compared with hand-weeded controls.

Taxon
Fragaria X ananassa DuchFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
napropamidee4
Outcome
fruit yielde2
Direction
no adverse effecte2
Qualifier
the following seasone2
Comparator
hand-weeded controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–257 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no adverse effect on fruit yield the following season when compared to hand-weeded controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–521 · show in text ↑
e4

“Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant-incorporated application gave slightly higher strawberry yields than post-transplant application.

Taxon
Fragaria X ananassa DuchFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
preplant-incorporatede3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
slightlye3
Comparator
post-transplant applicationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–257 · show in text ↑
e3

“except that slightly higher yields were obtained when all herbicides were preplant-incorporated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–679 · show in text ↑
e4

“Preplant-incorporated and post-transplant applications of napropamide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants responded similarly to the two application methods.

Taxon
Fragaria X ananassa DuchFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
application methodse5
Outcome
The plants responded similarlye5
Direction
similarlye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“newly transplanted ‘Midway’ stawberries ( Fragaria X ananassa Duch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–257 · show in text ↑
e5

“The plants responded similarly to the 2 application methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–582 · show in text ↑

napropamide · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.