Paper · 2022 · Sustainability in Food and Agriculture

POTENTIAL USE OF ANIMAL MANURES IN MANAGING PHYTOPHTHORA WILT OF CHILLI CAUSED BY PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI

Ganja Singh Rai; David Ian Guest

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phytophthora wilt of chilli, caused by Phytophthora capsici, is a major concern for many growers because an effective management method has not been identified yet. In agriculture, animal manures have primarily been focussed on the supply of nutrients to the crops but their use for suppression of soil borne diseases is not well investigated and understood. In this study, we examined the efficacy of five different animal manures (poultry, cattle, goat, pig and sheep) at four levels (1, 5, 10 and 20% volume/volume) added to potting mix for management of Phytophthora wilt of chilli. The preliminary study revealed that the quantity of 5 g per pot (500 mL) of P. capsici-colonised millet-seed inoculum was effective for the development of Phytophthora wilt in chilli seedlings grown in coir-based potting media. The main greenhouse experiments were conducted in randomised complete design with five replications. The results showed that all types of manures were effective in increasing the survival rate of chilli by reducing the incidence of Phytophthora wilt. In the first planting all manures caused at least two-fold increase in plant survival compared to the inoculated control. The chilli plant survival was much higher in the second planting when seedlings were planted after six week of incorporation of manures and seven weeks after inoculation of potting mix. Among manures, the highest plant survival percentage at the final assessment was found in pots amended with 20% v/v poultry manure in both the first (66%) and the second (86%) plantings. For sustainable and effective management of Phytophthora wilt of chilli, this study recommends application of poultry manure to growing media two months before planting of chilli seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. capsici-colonised millet-seed inoculum at 5 g per pot induced wilt in chilli seedlings.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
5 g per pot (500 mL) of P. capsici-colonised millet-seed inoculume0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
development of Phytophthora wilte0
Setting
coir-based potting mediae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preliminary study revealed that the quantity of 5 g per pot (500 mL) of P. capsici-colonised millet-seed inoculum was effective for the development of Phytophthora wilt in chilli seedlings grown in coir-based potting media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All manure types reduced Phytophthora wilt incidence.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
all types of manurese0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of Phytophthora wilte0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all types of manures were effective in increasing the survival rate of chilli by reducing the incidence of Phytophthora wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All manure types increased chilli survival.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
all types of manurese0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome
survival rate of chillie0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all types of manures were effective in increasing the survival rate of chilli by reducing the incidence of Phytophthora wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first planting, all manures at least doubled survival relative to inoculated controls.

Treatment
all manurese0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
increasee0
Value
at least two-folde0
Qualifier
first plantinge0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the first planting all manures caused at least two-fold increase in plant survival compared to the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli survival was much higher in the second planting after a six-week manure incorporation interval.

Taxon
chillie0
Outcome
plant survivale0
Direction
much highere0
Qualifier
after six week of incorporation of manures and seven weeks after inoculation of potting mixe0

Verbatim

e0

“The chilli plant survival was much higher in the second planting when seedlings were planted after six week of incorporation of manures and seven weeks after inoculation of potting mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty percent poultry manure produced the highest final survival in the first planting, 66%.

Treatment
20% v/v poultry manuree0
Outcome
plant survival percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
66%e0
Qualifier
firste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the highest plant survival percentage at the final assessment was found in pots amended with 20% v/v poultry manure in both the first (66%) and the second (86%) plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty percent poultry manure produced the highest final survival in the second planting, 86%.

Treatment
20% v/v poultry manuree0
Outcome
plant survival percentagee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
86%e0
Qualifier
seconde0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the highest plant survival percentage at the final assessment was found in pots amended with 20% v/v poultry manure in both the first (66%) and the second (86%) plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1559 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adding poultry manure to growing media two months before planting chilli seedlings.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
application of poultry manure to growing media two months before planting of chilli seedlingse0
Outcome
application of poultry manure to growing media two months before planting of chilli seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“this study recommends application of poultry manure to growing media two months before planting of chilli seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1749 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Phytophthora capsici · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.