Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Identification of Soil Bacterial Isolates Suppressing Different Phytophthora spp. and Promoting Plant Growth

Sharifah Farhana Syed-Ab-Rahman; Lilia C. Carvalhais; Elvis Chua; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
99
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bacterial isolates obtained from the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis and a plantless compost potting mix were screened for anti-oomycete activity against Phytophthora capsici, Phytophthora citricola, Phytophthora palmivora and Phytophthora cinnamomi. Three out of 48 isolates exhibited more than 65% inhibition against all tested Phytophthora species and were selected for further studies. These strains, named UQ154, UQ156 and UQ202, are closely related to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis and Acinetobacter sp., respectively, based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis. The isolates were evaluated for their ability to fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, as well as for siderophore, indole acetic acid, cell wall degrading enzymes and biofilm production. Their plant growth promoting activities were evaluated by measuring their effect on the germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigour of lettuce plants. All of these traits were significantly enhanced in plants grown from seeds inoculated with the isolates compared with control plants. Moreover, bacteria-inoculated P. capsici-infected chilli plants exhibited improved productivity based on CO2 assimilation rates. Both real-time quantitative PCR and disease severity index revealed significant decreases in pathogen load in infected chilli root tissues when plants were previously inoculated with the isolates. Biocontrol activity may result from the secretion of diketopiperazines as identified by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry analysis of bacterial cultures’ extracts. Collectively, this work demonstrates the potential of bacterial isolates to control Phytophthora infection and promote plant growth. They can, therefore be considered as candidate microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bacterial isolates inhibited all tested Phytophthora species by more than 65%.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise1
Material
Three out of 48 isolatese0
Interactor
Phytophthora speciesPhytophthorae0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition against all tested Phytophthora speciese0
Value
more than 65%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: In vitro inhibition measured without a plant host; taxon names the plant source of isolates.

Verbatim

e0

“Three out of 48 isolates exhibited more than 65% inhibition against all tested Phytophthora species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“rhizosphere of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three selected isolates were closely related to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Acinetobacter sp., respectively.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise1
Outcome
closely related to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis and Acinetobacter sp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: Isolate identity is not a plant outcome.

Verbatim

e0

“These strains, named UQ154, UQ156 and UQ202, are closely related to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis and Acinetobacter sp., respectively, based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“rhizosphere of Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 37–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation significantly enhanced lettuce germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigour compared with controls.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
seeds inoculated with the isolatese0
Interactor
the isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigoure0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigour of lettuce plants. All of these traits were significantly enhanced in plants grown from seeds inoculated with the isolates compared with control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria-inoculated, P. capsici-infected chilli plants had improved productivity measured by CO2 assimilation.

Taxon
chilli plantse0
Treatment
bacteria-inoculatede0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Second interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
CO2 assimilation ratese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria-inoculated P. capsici-infected chilli plants exhibited improved productivity based on CO2 assimilation rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior inoculation significantly decreased pathogen load in infected chilli roots.

Taxon
chillie0
Organ / stage
root tissuese0
Treatment
previously inoculated with the isolatese0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie1pathogen
Second interactor
the isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pathogen load in infected chilli root tissuese0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decreases in pathogen load in infected chilli root tissues when plants were previously inoculated with the isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1392 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. capsici-infected chilli plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol activity may result from diketopiperazine secretion.

Taxon
chilli plantse1
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie1pathogen
Compound
diketopiperazinese0
Outcome
Biocontrol activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biocontrol activity may result from the secretion of diketopiperazines as identified by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry analysis of bacterial cultures’ extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. capsici-infected chilli plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1131 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial isolates are candidates for microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae1
Outcome
candidate microbial biofertilizers and biopesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They can, therefore be considered as candidate microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1783 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“chilli plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1131 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Phytophthora capsici · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 97 positive, 14 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.