Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

The Effect of Piriformospora Indica on Shoot and Root Dry Matter Yield and Zinc and Iron Uptake by Wheat in a Calcareous Soil

M. J. Asadollahzade; A. H. Khoshgoftarmanesh; M. Sepehri

5
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) deficiency is common in wheat growing areas of the world particularly in calcareous soils. Soil application of chemical fertilizers is considered as a cost-effective and easy approach to combat micronutrient deficiency. However, due to economic, environmental, and agronomic constrains, efficiency of soil fertilization is low in most calcareous soils. Therefore, finding proper and effective approaches to improve fertilizer use efficiency and/or soil availability of metal nutrients is of great importance. This research was performed to investigate the effect of endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica and Zn-sulfate application on root and shoot dry matter yield and uptake of Fe and Zn by wheat. The experiment was set up in a completely randomized factorial design; each treatment contained three replicates. Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Durum and Rushan) were exposed to two Zn fertilizer rates (0 and 15 mg/kg ZnSO4.7H2O) and were inoculated with and without P. indica. Results showed that inoculation with P. indica increased root and shoot uptake of Fe (25 and 27%, respectively) and Zn (46 and 26%, respectively). In general, inoculation of roots with P. indica resulted in significant increase of shoot and root dry matter yield and uptake of Fe and Zn by both studied wheat cultivars. Infection of wheat roots with P. indica seems to be an effective and environment-friendly approach to improve Fe and Zn uptake in calcareous soil; although further research is needed to clarify all aspects of this approach

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. indica increased root and shoot uptake of Fe, by 25 and 27%

Organ / stage
root and shoote1
Treatment
inoculation with P. indicae1
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
uptake of Fee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
25 and 27%, respectivelye1
Comparator
without P. indicae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“inoculation with P. indica increased root and shoot uptake of Fe (25 and 27%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1131 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Durum and Rushan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–903 · show in text ↑
e5

“were inoculated with and without P. indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1018 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with P. indica increased root and shoot uptake of Zn, by 46 and 26%

Organ / stage
root and shoote1
Treatment
inoculation with P. indicae1
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
46 and 26%, respectivelye1
Comparator
without P. indicae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“inoculation with P. indica increased root and shoot uptake of Fe (25 and 27%, respectively) and Zn (46 and 26%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Durum and Rushan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–903 · show in text ↑
e5

“were inoculated with and without P. indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1018 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of roots with P. indica significantly increased shoot and root dry matter yield of wheat

Treatment
inoculation of roots with P. indicae3
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry matter yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
without P. indicae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“inoculation of roots with P. indica resulted in significant increase of shoot and root dry matter yield and uptake of Fe and Zn by both studied wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1338 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Durum and Rushan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–903 · show in text ↑
e5

“were inoculated with and without P. indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1018 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of roots with P. indica significantly increased uptake of Fe and Zn by both wheat cultivars

Treatment
inoculation of roots with P. indicae3
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
uptake of Fe and Zne3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
without P. indicae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“inoculation of roots with P. indica resulted in significant increase of shoot and root dry matter yield and uptake of Fe and Zn by both studied wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1338 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L. cvs. Durum and Rushan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–903 · show in text ↑
e5

“were inoculated with and without P. indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1018 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–628 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Infection of wheat roots with P. indica seems to be an effective and environment-friendly way to improve Fe and Zn uptake in calcareous soil

Treatment
Infection of wheat roots with P. indicae4
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
Fe and Zn uptakee4
Setting
calcareous soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Infection of wheat roots with P. indica seems to be an effective and environment-friendly approach to improve Fe and Zn uptake in calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1485 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophyte fungus Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–628 · show in text ↑

Serendipita indica · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Serendipita indica · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.