Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Adaptabilities of Water Production Function Models for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China

Tangzhe Nie; Dehao Lu; Zhongxue Zhang; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crop water production function models (WPFMs) are required methods to study the relationships between yield and water consumption under regulated deficit irrigation (RDI). In this study, a pot experiment was established to study the effect of water deficit during both individual growth stages and across two consecutive growth stages of rice on yield, water consumption, and water use efficiency (WUE) in 2017 and 2018. Light, medium, and severe water deficits were set as 80~90%, 70~80%, and 60~70% of saturated soil moisture content, respectively. The accuracies of five WPFMs were tested based on the experimental results. The results showed that yields and WUE of a light water deficit were higher than those of medium and severe water deficits at each growth stage. The yields and WUE of light drought stress treatments in the flowering and milky stages were higher than the saturated soil moisture control by 4~7.4% and 5.3~20.6%, respectively. Water consumption decreased with increasing water deficit across two consecutive growth stages. The Minhas model had the highest simulation accuracy of the five WPFMs, with relatively lower AE, RMSE, Cv, CRM, and higher R2, which were 0.0002, 0.0634, 6.9965, 0.0002, and 0.9951 in 2017 and 0.0110, 0.0760, 8.9882, 0.0131, and 0.9923 in 2018, respectively. The sensitivity indices for the Minhas model more accurately reflected the sensitivity of rice yield to water deficit at different growth stages in 2017 and 2018, compared with the Jensen model, Stewart model, Blank model, and Singh model. Rice yield was most sensitive to water deficit at the jointing and booting stage. The results indicate that the Minhas model is the most suitable WPFM for guiding rice irrigation practices in cold and black soil regions of China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light water deficit gave higher yields and WUE than medium and severe water deficits at each growth stage.

Treatment
light water deficite1
Outcome
yields and WUEe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
medium and severe water deficitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yields and WUE of a light water deficit were higher than those of medium and severe water deficits at each growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light drought stress in the flowering and milky stages raised yields by 4~7.4% above the saturated soil moisture control.

Treatment
light drought stress treatments in the flowering and milky stagese2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
highere2
Value
4~7.4%e2
Comparator
saturated soil moisture controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The yields and WUE of light drought stress treatments in the flowering and milky stages were higher than the saturated soil moisture control by 4~7.4% and 5.3~20.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light drought stress in the flowering and milky stages raised WUE by 5.3~20.6% above the saturated soil moisture control.

Treatment
light drought stress treatments in the flowering and milky stagese2
Outcome
WUEe2
Direction
highere2
Value
5.3~20.6%e2
Comparator
saturated soil moisture controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The yields and WUE of light drought stress treatments in the flowering and milky stages were higher than the saturated soil moisture control by 4~7.4% and 5.3~20.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water consumption decreased with increasing water deficit across two consecutive growth stages.

Treatment
increasing water deficite3
Outcome
Water consumptione3
Direction
decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Water consumption decreased with increasing water deficit across two consecutive growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Minhas model had the highest simulation accuracy of the five water production function models.

Outcome
simulation accuracye4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
the five WPFMse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The Minhas model had the highest simulation accuracy of the five WPFMs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Minhas model had an R2 of 0.9951 in 2017.

Outcome
R2e6
Value
0.9951e6
Qualifier
in 2017e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“higher R2, which were 0.0002, 0.0634, 6.9965, 0.0002, and 0.9951 in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Minhas model had an R2 of 0.9923 in 2018.

Outcome
R2e7
Value
0.9923e7
Qualifier
in 2018e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“higher R2, which were 0.0002, 0.0634, 6.9965, 0.0002, and 0.9951 in 2017 and 0.0110, 0.0760, 8.9882, 0.0131, and 0.9923 in 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sensitivity indices of the Minhas model reflected the sensitivity of rice yield to water deficit more accurately than the other four models.

Outcome
sensitivity indicese5
Direction
more accuratelye5
Comparator
Jensen model, Stewart model, Blank model, and Singh modele5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The sensitivity indices for the Minhas model more accurately reflected the sensitivity of rice yield to water deficit at different growth stages in 2017 and 2018, compared with the Jensen model, Stewart model, Blank model, and Singh model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield was most sensitive to water deficit at the jointing and booting stage.

Organ / stage
jointing and booting stagee6
Outcome
Rice yielde6
Direction
most sensitivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Rice yield was most sensitive to water deficit at the jointing and booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The Minhas model is the most suitable water production function model for guiding rice irrigation practices in cold and black soil regions of China.

Outcome
rice irrigation practicese7
Setting
cold and black soil regions of Chinae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The results indicate that the Minhas model is the most suitable WPFM for guiding rice irrigation practices in cold and black soil regions of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1776 · show in text ↑
t0

“for Rice in Cold and Black Soil Region of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–98 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

68 papers: 36 positive, 32 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

92 papers: 30 positive, 62 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

stage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 88 positive, 36 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 246 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.