Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Impact of Phosphorous Fertilization on Rape and Common Vetch Intercropped Fodder and Soil Phosphorus Dynamics in North China

Jiahui Qu; Lijun Li; Peiyi Zhao; et al.

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores the effect of phosphorus (P) fractions, under P addition or not, based on a common vetch-rape model cropping system in alkaline soil. A two year field experiment was conducted at Tuzuo Banner modern agricultural Park in Inner Mongolia, China. Two phosphorus levels, including P0 (no fertilizer) and P45 (45 kg·ha−1 P), were performed in common vetch and rape either grown alone or intercropped. We analyzed the changes of the physicochemical properties and phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere soil. Intercropping enhanced the common vetch and rape yield by 42.05% and 24.91%, on average, compared with corresponding sole cropping on an equivalent area basis. The average land equivalent ratio (LER) was 1.34. Intercropping had a significant AP concentration, of 65.32% and 33.99% at the P0 level, and 62.83% and 36.19% at the P45 level, respectively, compared to that of the sole common vetch and rape. With the application of P, intercropping improved the Resin-Pi and NaHCO3-Pi fraction (61.17%, 87.03% at the P0 level and 96.50%, 41.85% at the P45 level, compared to monocropped common vetch and rape in 2019). The changes in NaOH-Pi and NaOH-Po (except for NaOH-Pi in 2019) showed no significant difference between cropping systems. Intercropping significantly accumulated concentrations of HCl-P, while depleting Residual-P, in 2020. In conclusion, common vetch/rape with the addition of P polyculture stimulated rhizosphere soil P mobilization and had a yield advantage over sole cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased common vetch yield by 42.05% compared with sole cropping.

Taxon
common vetchVicia sativae1
Treatment
Intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
42.05%e1
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intercropping enhanced the common vetch and rape yield by 42.05% and 24.91%, on average, compared with corresponding sole cropping on an equivalent area basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased rape yield by 24.91% compared with sole cropping.

Treatment
Intercroppinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
24.91%e1
Comparator
sole croppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Intercropping enhanced the common vetch and rape yield by 42.05% and 24.91%, on average, compared with corresponding sole cropping on an equivalent area basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–681 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average land equivalent ratio of the common vetch-rape intercropping system was 1.34.

Taxon
common vetch-rapee3
Outcome
land equivalent ratio (LER)e2
Value
1.34e2

Verbatim

e2

“The average land equivalent ratio (LER) was 1.34”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–731 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave a significantly higher AP concentration in common vetch than sole cropping at the P0 level (65.32%).

Taxon
common vetchVicia sativae4
Treatment
Intercroppinge4
Outcome
AP concentratione4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
65.32%e4
Qualifier
P0 levele4
Comparator
sole common vetch and rapee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Intercropping had a significant AP concentration, of 65.32% and 33.99% at the P0 level, and 62.83% and 36.19% at the P45 level, respectively, compared to that of the sole common vetch and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave a significantly higher AP concentration in rape than sole cropping at the P0 level (33.99%).

Treatment
Intercroppinge4
Outcome
AP concentratione4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
33.99%e4
Qualifier
P0 levele4
Comparator
sole common vetch and rapee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Intercropping had a significant AP concentration, of 65.32% and 33.99% at the P0 level, and 62.83% and 36.19% at the P45 level, respectively, compared to that of the sole common vetch and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave a significantly higher AP concentration in common vetch than sole cropping at the P45 level (62.83%).

Taxon
common vetchVicia sativae4
Treatment
Intercroppinge4
Outcome
AP concentratione4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
62.83%e4
Qualifier
P45 levele4
Comparator
sole common vetch and rapee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Intercropping had a significant AP concentration, of 65.32% and 33.99% at the P0 level, and 62.83% and 36.19% at the P45 level, respectively, compared to that of the sole common vetch and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave a significantly higher AP concentration in rape than sole cropping at the P45 level (36.19%).

Treatment
Intercroppinge4
Outcome
AP concentratione4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
36.19%e4
Qualifier
P45 levele4
Comparator
sole common vetch and rapee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Intercropping had a significant AP concentration, of 65.32% and 33.99% at the P0 level, and 62.83% and 36.19% at the P45 level, respectively, compared to that of the sole common vetch and rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved Resin-Pi in common vetch and rape at the P0 level (61.17%).

Taxon
common vetch and rapeBrassica napusVicia sativae5
Treatment
intercroppinge5
Outcome
Resin-Pie5
Direction
improvede5
Value
61.17%e5
Qualifier
P0 levele5
Comparator
monocropped common vetch and rapee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“With the application of P, intercropping improved the Resin-Pi and NaHCO3-Pi fraction (61.17%, 87.03% at the P0 level and 96.50%, 41.85% at the P45 level, compared to monocropped common vetch and rape in 2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1136 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved NaHCO3-Pi in common vetch and rape at the P0 level (87.03%).

Taxon
common vetch and rapeBrassica napusVicia sativae5
Treatment
intercroppinge5
Outcome
NaHCO3-Pie5
Direction
improvede5
Value
87.03%e5
Qualifier
P0 levele5
Comparator
monocropped common vetch and rapee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“With the application of P, intercropping improved the Resin-Pi and NaHCO3-Pi fraction (61.17%, 87.03% at the P0 level and 96.50%, 41.85% at the P45 level, compared to monocropped common vetch and rape in 2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1136 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved Resin-Pi in common vetch and rape at the P45 level (96.50%).

Taxon
common vetch and rapeBrassica napusVicia sativae5
Treatment
intercroppinge5
Outcome
Resin-Pie5
Direction
improvede5
Value
96.50%e5
Qualifier
P45 levele5
Comparator
monocropped common vetch and rapee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“With the application of P, intercropping improved the Resin-Pi and NaHCO3-Pi fraction (61.17%, 87.03% at the P0 level and 96.50%, 41.85% at the P45 level, compared to monocropped common vetch and rape in 2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1136 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping improved NaHCO3-Pi in common vetch and rape at the P45 level (41.85%).

Taxon
common vetch and rapeBrassica napusVicia sativae5
Treatment
intercroppinge5
Outcome
NaHCO3-Pie5
Direction
improvede5
Value
41.85%e5
Qualifier
P45 levele5
Comparator
monocropped common vetch and rapee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“With the application of P, intercropping improved the Resin-Pi and NaHCO3-Pi fraction (61.17%, 87.03% at the P0 level and 96.50%, 41.85% at the P45 level, compared to monocropped common vetch and rape in 2019)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1136 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in NaOH-Pi and NaOH-Po showed no significant difference between intercropping and sole cropping, except NaOH-Pi in 2019.

Taxon
common vetch-rapee3
Outcome
changes in NaOH-Pi and NaOH-Poe6
Direction
no significant differencee6
Qualifier
except for NaOH-Pi in 2019e6
Comparator
between cropping systemse6

Verbatim

e6

“The changes in NaOH-Pi and NaOH-Po (except for NaOH-Pi in 2019) showed no significant difference between cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1259 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly accumulated HCl-P concentrations in 2020.

Taxon
common vetch-rapee3
Treatment
Intercroppinge7
Outcome
concentrations of HCl-Pe7
Direction
accumulatede7
Qualifier
in 2020e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“Intercropping significantly accumulated concentrations of HCl-P, while depleting Residual-P, in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1361 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping depleted Residual-P in 2020.

Taxon
common vetch-rapee3
Treatment
Intercroppinge7
Outcome
Residual-Pe7
Direction
depletinge7
Qualifier
in 2020e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“Intercropping significantly accumulated concentrations of HCl-P, while depleting Residual-P, in 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1361 · show in text ↑
e3

“common vetch-rape model cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common vetch/rape with P addition stimulated rhizosphere soil P mobilization relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
common vetch/rapeBrassica napusVicia sativae0
Treatment
addition of Pe0
Outcome
rhizosphere soil P mobilizatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia sativa
Vicia sativa · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common vetch/rape with the addition of P polyculture stimulated rhizosphere soil P mobilization and had a yield advantage over sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1518 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vicia sativa (common vetch)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.