Paper · 2022 · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

The impact of the long-term application of mineral nitrogen and sewage sludge fertilizers on the quality of soil organic matter

Jiří Balík; Martin Kulhánek; Jindřich Černý; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Soil fertility is substantially influenced by soil organic matter quality and quantity. Much attention has also been given to glomalin content as one of the qualitative parameters of soil fertility. Glomalin content is considered an indicator of soil fertility due to its positive correlation with soil organic carbon. Aim This study aim to (i) determine the influence of different fertilization systems on maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters, (ii) ensure that changes in total glomalin content (TG) and easily extractable glomalin (EEG) content are sensitive enough to reflect changes in the SOM quality resulting from long-term fertilization, and (iii) determine whether both forms of glomalin must be determined or if the easily extractable glomalin (EEG) content is sufficient, even for a fertile chernozem. Materials and methods Long-term field experiments with silage maize monocultures were used to study relationships under different rates of mineral nitrogen and sewage sludge fertilization. The trials comprised 5 treatments: (i) no fertilization control (Con), (ii) and (iii) two different calcium ammonium nitrate rates (N120 and N240 at doses of 120 and 240 kg N ha −1 year −1 , respectively), and iv) and v) two different sewage sludge rates (S120 and S240 corresponding to mineral N doses). Topsoil (0–30 cm) analysis was performed 28 years after the onset of the experiment to determine soil organic carbon, the fractions of humic substances, potentially mineralizable carbon and dissolved organic carbon, the potential wettability index, soil aggregate stability, EEG, and total glomalin (TG). Results The control treatment, which did not include fertilization, showed significantly lower average yields (9.76 t DM ha −1 year −1 ) than the fertilization treatments (on average 12.3 DM ha −1 year −1 ). Significant differences in yields were not found between the fertilization treatments. A positive correlation between glomalin (EEG, TG) content and soil organic matter carbon content was observed. A periodic application of sewage sludge increased the content of glomalin. However, the highest quality of SOM was found in the control treatment (nonfertilized). This treatment had the highest values for the humic/fulvic acid ratio and the highest contents of humic acids and potentially mineralizable carbon. Furthermore, the Con treatment showed the highest soil aggregate stability and potential wettability index. Mineral N fertilization significantly reduced soil aggregate stability values. Conclusions The unfertilized control showed the highest SOM quality but the lowest yields. The data on glomalin content can be used to study soil organic matter quality. Because the EEG extraction method is easy to apply, uses lower quantities of chemicals and consumes less time, it presents a better option than TG extraction. The sensitivity of the methods for SOM quality determination decreases with increasing SOM content. Graphical Abstract

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized maize yielded significantly less than fertilized treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
average yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
9.76 t DM ha −1 year −1e0
Qualifier
on average 12.3 DM ha −1 year −1e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control treatment, which did not include fertilization, showed significantly lower average yields (9.76 t DM ha −1 year −1 ) than the fertilization treatments (on average 12.3 DM ha −1 year −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1857 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ significantly among fertilization treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not founde0
Comparator
fertilization treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences in yields were not found between the fertilization treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1944 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glomalin content correlated positively with soil organic carbon content.

Compound
soil organic matter carbone0
Outcome
glomalin (EEG, TG) contente0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation between glomalin (EEG, TG) content and soil organic matter carbon content was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2055 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic sewage sludge application increased glomalin content.

Treatment
periodic application of sewage sludgee0
Outcome
content of glomaline0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A periodic application of sewage sludge increased the content of glomalin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2130 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized control had the highest soil organic matter quality.

Treatment
control treatment (nonfertilized)e0
Outcome
quality of SOMe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the highest quality of SOM was found in the control treatment (nonfertilized).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2218 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest humic to fulvic acid ratio and humic acid and mineralizable carbon contents.

Outcome
humic/fulvic acid ratio and the highest contents of humic acids and potentially mineralizable carbone0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment had the highest values for the humic/fulvic acid ratio and the highest contents of humic acids and potentially mineralizable carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2366 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest soil aggregate stability and potential wettability index.

Outcome
soil aggregate stability and potential wettability indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the Con treatment showed the highest soil aggregate stability and potential wettability index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2380–2474 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral nitrogen fertilization significantly reduced soil aggregate stability.

Treatment
Mineral N fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil aggregate stability valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral N fertilization significantly reduced soil aggregate stability values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2475–2553 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Glomalin content was judged useful for evaluating soil organic matter quality.

Outcome
soil organic matter qualitye0
Qualifier
glomalin contente0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The data on glomalin content can be used to study soil organic matter quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2645–2723 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

EEG extraction was preferred over TG extraction on ease, chemical use and time.

Outcome
EEG extraction methode0
Direction
better optione0
Comparator
TG extractione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Because the EEG extraction method is easy to apply, uses lower quantities of chemicals and consumes less time, it presents a better option than TG extraction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2724–2882 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sensitivity of soil organic matter quality methods declined as SOM content rose.

Compound
SOM contente0
Outcome
sensitivity of the methods for SOM quality determinatione0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity of the methods for SOM quality determination decreases with increasing SOM content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2883–2982 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize yield and soil organic matter quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–481 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

fertilization · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 83 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.