Paper · 2022 · Acta Horticulturae

Pneumatic defoliation of apple trees for colour improvement

C. Andergassen; D. Pichler

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bicoloured apple are quite commonly affected by a lack of red coloration, especially in the bottom part of the trees. Different treatments, such as manual leaf removal, summer pruning, or reflective white woven mulch cloth, for example, Extenday™, have proven their potential to improve the skin colour of apples. The objective of the present work was to examine the effect of pneumatic leave removal on skin colour improvement of the bicoloured apple 'Nicoter'/'Kanzi ®' and 'Cripps Pink'/Pink Lady ®. For this purpose, different trials with a pneumatic leave blower built by Olmi (Italy) were conducted in two commercial orchards at the Research Center Laimburg near Bozen (Italy) in autumn 2018. On 'Nicoter'/'Kanzi ® ', defoliation by hand and pneumatic defoliation were compared, whereas, on 'Cripps Pink'/Pink Lady ®, three different air pressures (0.3, 0.7, and 1.0 bar) were compared. The first results were very promising, depending on cv. and year. Trees treated with the pneumatic leave blower reached a yield of 90.1% of first quality fruit, whereas the untreated control only reached 53.3%. This brought, in some cases, a net financial gain of 10,997€ ha-1. No differences in ripening and starch breakdown were observed in the trials; however, some minor effects on fruit size were detected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pneumatic leaf blowing yielded 90.1% first quality fruit, versus 53.3% in untreated trees.

Treatment
pneumatic leave blowere0
Outcome
first quality fruite0
Value
90.1%e0
Qualifier
53.3%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees treated with the pneumatic leave blower reached a yield of 90.1% of first quality fruit, whereas the untreated control only reached 53.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pneumatic leaf blowing brought a net financial gain of 10,997€ ha-1 in some cases.

Outcome
net financial gaine0
Direction
gaine0
Value
10,997€ ha-1e0
Qualifier
in some casese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This brought, in some cases, a net financial gain of 10,997€ ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trials found no differences in ripening or starch breakdown.

Treatment
pneumatic defoliationt0
Outcome
ripening and starch breakdowne0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in ripening and starch breakdown were observed in the trials;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pneumatic defoliation of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The trials detected minor effects on fruit size.

Treatment
pneumatic defoliationt0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Qualifier
minor effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some minor effects on fruit size were detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pneumatic defoliation of apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

47 papers: 21 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.