Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Silicon enhances plant resistance to Fusarium wilt by promoting antioxidant potential and photosynthetic capacity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Shuangsheng Sun; Zhengkun Yang; Zhiyu Song; et al.

20
claims
45
verbatim quotes
53
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum (Fo), is a severe soil-borne disease affecting cucumber production worldwide, particularly under monocropping in greenhouses. Silicon (Si) plays an important role in improving the resistance of crops to Fusarium wilt, but the underlying mechanism is largely unclear. Here, an in vitro study showed that 3 mmol·l -1 Si had the best inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth of F. oxysporum in potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture for 7 days. Subsequently, the occurrence of cucumber wilt disease and its mechanisms were investigated upon treatments with exogenous silicon under soil culture. The plant height, stem diameter, root length, and root activity under Si+Fo treatment increased significantly by 39.53%, 94.87%, 74.32%, and 95.11% compared with Fo only. Importantly, the control efficiency of Si+Fo was 69.31% compared with that of Fo treatment. Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%, while the contents of H 2 O 2 , O2·− , and malondialdehyde (MDA) notably decreased by 21.67%, 59.67%, and 38.701%, respectively, in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo. Compared with Fo treatment, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), maximum RuBisCO carboxylation rates ( V cmax), maximum RuBP regeneration rates ( J max), and activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly. Furthermore, Si alleviated stomatal closure and enhanced endogenous silicon content compared with only Fo inoculation. The study results suggest that exogenous silicon application improves cucumber resistance to Fusarium wilt by stimulating the antioxidant system, photosynthetic capacity, and stomatal movement in cucumber leaves. This study brings new insights into the potential of Si application in boosting cucumber resistance against Fusarium wilt with a bright prospect for Si use in cucumber production under greenhouse conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon inhibited Fusarium mycelial growth most strongly at 3 mmol·l -1 in vitro.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
3 mmol·l -1 Sie0
Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
mycelial growth of F. oxysporume0
Direction
best inhibitory effecte0
Setting
potato dextrose agar (PDA) culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“3 mmol·l -1 Si had the best inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth of F. oxysporum in potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture for 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium increased cucumber plant height by 39.53% versus Fusarium alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Foe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.53%e0
Comparator
Fo onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height, stem diameter, root length, and root activity under Si+Fo treatment increased significantly by 39.53%, 94.87%, 74.32%, and 95.11% compared with Fo only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium increased cucumber stem diameter by 94.87% versus Fusarium alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Foe0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
94.87%e0
Comparator
Fo onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height, stem diameter, root length, and root activity under Si+Fo treatment increased significantly by 39.53%, 94.87%, 74.32%, and 95.11% compared with Fo only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium increased cucumber root length by 74.32% versus Fusarium alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Foe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
74.32%e0
Comparator
Fo onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height, stem diameter, root length, and root activity under Si+Fo treatment increased significantly by 39.53%, 94.87%, 74.32%, and 95.11% compared with Fo only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium increased cucumber root activity by 95.11% versus Fusarium alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Foe0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
95.11%e0
Comparator
Fo onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant height, stem diameter, root length, and root activity under Si+Fo treatment increased significantly by 39.53%, 94.87%, 74.32%, and 95.11% compared with Fo only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium achieved 69.31% wilt control efficiency versus Fusarium treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Foe0
Outcome
control efficiencye0
Value
69.31%e0
Comparator
Fo treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“the control efficiency of Si+Fo was 69.31% compared with that of Fo treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium raised cucumber root POD activity by 148.92% versus Fusarium.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Si + Foe1
Gene
peroxidase (POD)e0
Outcome
activities of peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
148.92%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium raised cucumber root CAT activity by 26.47% versus Fusarium.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si + Foe1
Gene
catalase (CAT)e0
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.47%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium raised cucumber root APX activity by 58.54% versus Fusarium.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si + Foe1
Gene
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
58.54%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1069 · show in text ↑
e1

“in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium reduced cucumber root H 2 O 2 content by 21.67%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si + Foe0
Outcome
contents of H 2 O 2e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
21.67%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%, while the contents of H 2 O 2 , O2·− , and malondialdehyde (MDA) notably decreased by 21.67%, 59.67%, and 38.701%, respectively, in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium reduced cucumber root O2·− content by 59.67%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si + Foe0
Outcome
O2·−e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
59.67%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%, while the contents of H 2 O 2 , O2·− , and malondialdehyde (MDA) notably decreased by 21.67%, 59.67%, and 38.701%, respectively, in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium reduced cucumber root MDA content by 38.701%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si + Foe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
38.701%e0
Comparator
Foe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo, the activities of peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) significantly increased by 148.92%, 26.47%, and 58.54%, while the contents of H 2 O 2 , O2·− , and malondialdehyde (MDA) notably decreased by 21.67%, 59.67%, and 38.701%, respectively, in roots of cucumber plants treated with Si + Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium significantly increased net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Fo treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fo treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo treatment, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), maximum RuBisCO carboxylation rates ( V cmax), maximum RuBP regeneration rates ( J max), and activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium significantly increased maximum RuBisCO carboxylation and RuBP regeneration rates.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Fo treatmente0
Outcome
maximum RuBisCO carboxylation rates ( V cmax), maximum RuBP regeneration rates ( J max)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fo treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo treatment, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), maximum RuBisCO carboxylation rates ( V cmax), maximum RuBP regeneration rates ( J max), and activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium significantly increased activities of RuBisCO, FBPase and GAPDH.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Fo treatmente0
Outcome
activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fo treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with Fo treatment, the net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), maximum RuBisCO carboxylation rates ( V cmax), maximum RuBP regeneration rates ( J max), and activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCO), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium significantly increased FBPA, TPI and SBPase expression.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Fo treatmente0
Outcome
expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fo treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1708 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with Fo treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon plus Fusarium significantly increased FBPase expression.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Si+Fo treatmente0
Outcome
FBPasee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Fo treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“the expression of FBPA , TPI , SBPase , and FBPase in Si+Fo treatment increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1708 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with Fo treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon alleviated stomatal closure relative to Fusarium inoculation alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
stomatal closuree0
Direction
alleviatede0
Comparator
only Fo inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Si alleviated stomatal closure and enhanced endogenous silicon content compared with only Fo inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon raised endogenous silicon content relative to Fusarium inoculation alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
endogenous silicon contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
only Fo inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“Si alleviated stomatal closure and enhanced endogenous silicon content compared with only Fo inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1827 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer silicon improves cucumber wilt resistance through antioxidant, photosynthetic and stomatal responses.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
exogenous silicon applicatione0
Outcome
cucumber resistance to Fusarium wilte0
Direction
improvese0
Qualifier
stimulating the antioxidant system, photosynthetic capacity, and stomatal movemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“exogenous silicon application improves cucumber resistance to Fusarium wilt by stimulating the antioxidant system, photosynthetic capacity, and stomatal movement in cucumber leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–2040 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

silicon atom · control · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

silicon atom · Fusarium oxysporum · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: expression · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.