Paper · 2022 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effects of black geotextile mulch and grass mulch on the microclimate, fruit quality and anthocyanin components of ‘Xinyu’ table grape

Jinge Hu; Shijian Bai; Ronghua Zhao; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT We analysed the effects of black geotextile inter‐row mulch, grass mulch and clean tillage as a control on the microclimate, anthocyanin components and fruit quality of ‘Xinyu’ table grape in a semi‐arid climate. Black geotextile inter‐row mulch increased the air and soil temperatures, while grass mulch decreased these. Six types of anthocyanins were detected in the grapes. Around 50% of the total anthocyanins were malvidin based (38.60%–39.10%) and peonidin based (25.80%–31.10%), with malvidin‐3‐O‐glucoside being the main pigment (38.75%–39.05%), followed by peonidin‐3‐O‐glucoside (23.84%–28.68%). The soluble solid content, reducing sugar content and sugar‐acid ratio for the black geotextile treatment group were 12.93%, 10.05% and 25.85% higher, respectively, than the control. By contrast, grapes in the grass mulch treatment group had a significantly lower soluble solid content than the control, with a 7.32% reduction being observed. Neither type of mulch had a large effect on the vitamin C content nor yield. However, both black geotextile inter‐row mulch and grass mulch could regulate the orchard microclimate and increased the total anthocyanin content by 36.04% and 5.03%, respectively, compared with the control. These findings suggest that grass mulch is the preferable cultivation method in the Turpan area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black geotextile mulch increased air and soil temperatures.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
‘Xinyu’t0
Treatment
Black geotextile inter‐row mulche0
Outcome
air and soil temperaturese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Black geotextile inter‐row mulch increased the air and soil temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch decreased air and soil temperatures.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grass mulche0
Outcome
decreased thesee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while grass mulch decreased these”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–329 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six anthocyanin types were detected.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
Six types of anthocyaninse0
Value
Six typese0

Verbatim

e0

“Six types of anthocyanins were detected in the grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malvidin based anthocyanins constituted 38.60%–39.10%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
malvidin basede0
Value
38.60%–39.10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“malvidin based (38.60%–39.10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–458 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peonidin based anthocyanins constituted 25.80%–31.10%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
peonidin basede0
Value
25.80%–31.10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“peonidin based (25.80%–31.10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malvidin 3 O glucoside was the main pigment at 38.75%–39.05%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
malvidin‐3‐O‐glucoside being the main pigmente0
Value
38.75%–39.05%e0

Verbatim

e0

“malvidin‐3‐O‐glucoside being the main pigment (38.75%–39.05%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peonidin 3 O glucoside followed at 23.84%–28.68%.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
peonidin‐3‐O‐glucosidee0
Value
23.84%–28.68%e0

Verbatim

e0

“peonidin‐3‐O‐glucoside (23.84%–28.68%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black geotextile raised soluble solids 12.93% over control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
black geotextile treatmente0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
12.93%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solid content, reducing sugar content and sugar‐acid ratio for the black geotextile treatment group were 12.93%, 10.05% and 25.85% higher, respectively, than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black geotextile raised reducing sugar 10.05% over control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
black geotextile treatmente0
Outcome
reducing sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.05%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solid content, reducing sugar content and sugar‐acid ratio for the black geotextile treatment group were 12.93%, 10.05% and 25.85% higher, respectively, than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black geotextile raised sugar acid ratio 25.85% over control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
black geotextile treatmente0
Outcome
sugar‐acid ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.85%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solid content, reducing sugar content and sugar‐acid ratio for the black geotextile treatment group were 12.93%, 10.05% and 25.85% higher, respectively, than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch reduced soluble solids 7.32% versus control.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
grass mulch treatmente0
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
7.32%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“grapes in the grass mulch treatment group had a significantly lower soluble solid content than the control, with a 7.32% reduction being observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither mulch greatly affected vitamin C content or yield.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
vitamin C content nor yielde0
Direction
Neither type of mulch had a large effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Neither type of mulch had a large effect on the vitamin C content nor yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black geotextile raised total anthocyanin content 36.04% versus control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
black geotextile inter‐row mulche0
Outcome
total anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.04%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“both black geotextile inter‐row mulch and grass mulch could regulate the orchard microclimate and increased the total anthocyanin content by 36.04% and 5.03%, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass mulch raised total anthocyanin content 5.03% versus control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
grass mulche0
Outcome
total anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.03%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“both black geotextile inter‐row mulch and grass mulch could regulate the orchard microclimate and increased the total anthocyanin content by 36.04% and 5.03%, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors favored grass mulch for cultivation in Turpan.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
grass mulch is the preferable cultivation methode0
Setting
Turpan areae0

Verbatim

e0

“grass mulch is the preferable cultivation method in the Turpan area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Xinyu’ table grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–134 · show in text ↑

mulching · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.