Paper · 2014 · Scientific Papers - Series B, Horticulture

INFLUENCE OF SOIL MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS AND FRUIT LOAD ON GRAPES QUALITY UNDER DROUGHT CONDITIONS

A. Şerdinescu; L. Pîrcălabu; L. Fotescu

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to diminish the disturbing effect of climatic changes in viticulture there were studied two agrotechnical factors which have an important impact on water regime in soil and on vine growth, respectively the soil maintenance system and fruit load. In comparison with black furrow (considered as control) there were experimented the total mulching with straws, the partial mulching (between the rows) with marc compost and minimum tillage. To reduce the negative impact of drought conditions in case of each soil maintenance systems a reduction of normal fruit load with 20 and 40% was also experimented. The experimental data obtained reveled that soil maintenance systems by mulching had a positive effect especially on the technological features of the grapes, assuring higher values for grain composition index and for efficiency index, that is a higher must content in grapes and a higher winemaking efficiency. The chemical properties of the grapes (sugar content, acidity, glucoacidimetric index) were not influenced in an obvious manner. Opposite, the reduction of fruit load determined in case of all soil maintenance systems an increase of sugar content in grapes, parallel with an evident decrease of must acidity, determining high values of the glucoacidimetric index, unfavorable for obtaining qualitative and typical wines. The changes induced in grapes quality by the two experimental factors have been reflected also in the wines quality (alchoolic degree, total acidity, unreducing extract). Ranking the wines obtained from all the experimental variants (combinations between the two experimental factors) by using the synthetic index of wines quality (Ntaj) one could notice that the soil maintenance systems by mulching and the fruit load of 15-18 buds/m 2 had a positive effect on wines quality under drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil maintenance by mulching gave higher grain composition index and efficiency index in grapes than black furrow.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
soil maintenance systems by mulchinge1
Outcome
grain composition index and for efficiency indexe1
Direction
higher valuese1
Comparator
black furrowe2

Verbatim

e0

“the soil maintenance system and fruit load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil maintenance systems by mulching had a positive effect especially on the technological features of the grapes, assuring higher values for grain composition index and for efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“In comparison with black furrow (considered as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil maintenance by mulching gave a higher must content in grapes than black furrow.

Taxon
grapese4
Treatment
soil maintenance systems by mulchinge1
Outcome
must content in grapese4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
black furrowe2

Verbatim

e1

“soil maintenance systems by mulching had a positive effect especially on the technological features of the grapes, assuring higher values for grain composition index and for efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“In comparison with black furrow (considered as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–310 · show in text ↑
e4

“a higher must content in grapes and a higher winemaking efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil maintenance by mulching gave a higher winemaking efficiency than black furrow.

Taxon
grapese4
Treatment
soil maintenance systems by mulchinge1
Outcome
winemaking efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
black furrowe2

Verbatim

e1

“soil maintenance systems by mulching had a positive effect especially on the technological features of the grapes, assuring higher values for grain composition index and for efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–845 · show in text ↑
e2

“In comparison with black furrow (considered as control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–310 · show in text ↑
e4

“a higher must content in grapes and a higher winemaking efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil maintenance systems did not obviously influence the chemical properties of grapes (sugar content, acidity, glucoacidimetric index).

Taxon
grapese3
Treatment
soil maintenance systeme0
Outcome
chemical properties of the grapese3
Direction
not influenced in an obvious mannere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the soil maintenance system and fruit load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–253 · show in text ↑
e3

“The chemical properties of the grapes (sugar content, acidity, glucoacidimetric index) were not influenced in an obvious manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing fruit load by 20 and 40% increased sugar content in grapes.

Taxon
grapese6
Treatment
reduction of fruit loade6
Outcome
sugar content in grapese6
Direction
increasee6
Value
20 and 40%e5
Comparator
normal fruit loade5

Verbatim

e5

“a reduction of normal fruit load with 20 and 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–587 · show in text ↑
e6

“the reduction of fruit load determined in case of all soil maintenance systems an increase of sugar content in grapes, parallel with an evident decrease of must acidity, determining high values of the glucoacidimetric index, unfavorable for obtaining qualitative and typical wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing fruit load gave an evident decrease of must acidity in grapes.

Taxon
grapese6
Treatment
reduction of fruit loade6
Outcome
must aciditye6
Direction
evident decreasee6
Comparator
normal fruit loade5

Verbatim

e5

“a reduction of normal fruit load with 20 and 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–587 · show in text ↑
e6

“the reduction of fruit load determined in case of all soil maintenance systems an increase of sugar content in grapes, parallel with an evident decrease of must acidity, determining high values of the glucoacidimetric index, unfavorable for obtaining qualitative and typical wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing fruit load gave high glucoacidimetric index values in grapes, unfavorable for qualitative and typical wines.

Taxon
grapese6
Treatment
reduction of fruit loade6
Outcome
glucoacidimetric indexe6
Direction
high valuese6
Comparator
normal fruit loade5

Verbatim

e5

“a reduction of normal fruit load with 20 and 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–587 · show in text ↑
e6

“the reduction of fruit load determined in case of all soil maintenance systems an increase of sugar content in grapes, parallel with an evident decrease of must acidity, determining high values of the glucoacidimetric index, unfavorable for obtaining qualitative and typical wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in grape quality induced by the two experimental factors were reflected in wine quality (alcoholic degree, total acidity, unreducing extract).

Taxon
grapese7
Treatment
two experimental factorse7
Outcome
wines qualitye7
Direction
have been reflectede7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“The changes induced in grapes quality by the two experimental factors have been reflected also in the wines quality (alchoolic degree, total acidity, unreducing extract)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil maintenance by mulching combined with a fruit load of 15-18 buds/m2 had a positive effect on wine quality under drought.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
soil maintenance systems by mulching and the fruit load of 15-18 buds/m 2e7
Outcome
wines qualitye7
Direction
positive effecte7
Setting
under drought conditionse7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“soil maintenance systems by mulching had a positive effect especially on the technological features of the grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–768 · show in text ↑
e7

“the soil maintenance systems by mulching and the fruit load of 15-18 buds/m 2 had a positive effect on wines quality under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1845 · show in text ↑

mulching · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.