Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF SOME NITROGEN SOURCES AND POTASSIUM LEVELS ON YIELD, QUALITY AND NITRATE ACCUMULATION IN LETTUCE LEAVES

M. Abou El-Nasr,

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To study the influence of nitrogen sources and potassium levels on growth, yield and chemical constituents of lettuce plants, cv. Balady, two experiments were conducted at Experimental Farm of Barramoon, Dakahlia Governorate during the winter seasons of 1999/2000 and 2000/2001. twelve treatments representing all possible combinations of three N sources (Urea, ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate) and four K doses (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg K2O / fed.) were used in split plots design with four replicates. The obtained results can be summarized as follows:- Vegetative growth and yield: 1. Effect of N-sources: Urea followed by ammonium nitrate were significantly increased growth and yield parameters (plant height, No. of outer and inner leaves, fresh and dry weight of outer and inner leaves, fresh weight / plant and total yield, ton/fed.) with no considerable differences among them in most cases. Ammonium sulphate was of the significant least effect. 2. Effect of K levels: Increasing K-levels from 0 up to 60 kg K2O/fed. considerably increased all the studied growth and yield parameters, 60 kg K2O level was the most superior one. 3. Effect of interaction: Interaction significantly affected growth and yield of lettuce plant, NH4NO3 x 60 kg K2O/fed followed by urea x 60 kg K2O/fed were the most superior treatments in their effect with no significant differences among them in most cases. K level (0 K2O/fed) x all N-sources used were the treatments of the significant least effect. Chemical constituents 1. Effect of N-sources: Both urea and ammonium nitrate were significantly improved N, P and K content of lettuce plant relative to ammonium sulphate with no considerable differences among them in most cases in the two seasons of study. On the other hand, urea was of the least NO3 content in their plant leaves. Ammonium nitrate was of the significant highest NO3 content in both seasons. 2. Effect of K-levels: N, P and K content considerably increased along with increasing the supplied K from 0 up to 60 Kg K2O/fed. NO3 accumulation was increased with increasing K from 0 to 40 kg K2O/fed, then decreased at 60 kg level. 3. Effect of interaction: K 0 level with all N-sources were the treatments of the lowest N, P, K and NO3 content relative to other treatments. NO3NH4 and urea x 60 kg K2O/fed were the treatment of the highest N, P and K, meanwhile, urea x 60 Kg K2O was of low NO3 content. Finally, it could be concluded that ammonium nitrate and/or urea each with 60 kg K2O/fed were the best treatments for maximizing the growth and yield of lettuce plant. Urea with 60 kg K2O/fed was the treatment of best yield and low NO3 content of leaves. So, it concluded as best treatment on basis of yield and NO3 safety level for human nutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea and ammonium nitrate increased lettuce growth and yield measures, with little difference between them.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Urea followed by ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
no considerable differences among them in most casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea followed by ammonium nitrate were significantly increased growth and yield parameters (plant height, No. of outer and inner leaves, fresh and dry weight of outer and inner leaves, fresh weight / plant and total yield, ton/fed.) with no considerable differences among them in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–901 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulphate had the least effect on lettuce growth and yield.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
least effecte0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulphate was of the significant least effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing potassium from zero to 60 kg K2O/fed. increased lettuce growth and yield, with 60 kg K2O most effective.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
K-levels from 0 up to 60 kg K2O/fed.e0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
60 kg K2O level was the most superior onee0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing K-levels from 0 up to 60 kg K2O/fed. considerably increased all the studied growth and yield parameters, 60 kg K2O level was the most superior one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate with 60 kg K2O/fed. and urea with 60 kg K2O/fed. were the strongest combinations for lettuce growth and yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
NH4NO3 x 60 kg K2O/fed followed by urea x 60 kg K2O/fede0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
most superiore0
Qualifier
no significant differences among them in most casese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction significantly affected growth and yield of lettuce plant, NH4NO3 x 60 kg K2O/fed followed by urea x 60 kg K2O/fed were the most superior treatments in their effect with no significant differences among them in most cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero potassium combined with any nitrogen source had the least effect on lettuce growth and yield.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
K level (0 K2O/fed) x all N-sourcese0
Outcome
least effecte0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K level (0 K2O/fed) x all N-sources used were the treatments of the significant least effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea and ammonium nitrate improved lettuce N, P, and K content relative to ammonium sulphate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
urea and ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
N, P and K contente0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
no considerable differences among them in most casese0
Comparator
ammonium sulphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both urea and ammonium nitrate were significantly improved N, P and K content of lettuce plant relative to ammonium sulphate with no considerable differences among them in most cases in the two seasons of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea produced the lowest lettuce leaf nitrate content.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
NO3 contente0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea was of the least NO3 content in their plant leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1826 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate produced the highest lettuce nitrate content in both seasons.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
NO3 contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nitrate was of the significant highest NO3 content in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1904 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce N, P, and K content increased as potassium supply rose from zero to 60 Kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
supplied K from 0 up to 60 Kg K2O/fed.e0
Outcome
N, P and K contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P and K content considerably increased along with increasing the supplied K from 0 up to 60 Kg K2O/fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2034 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce nitrate accumulation rose as potassium increased from zero to 40 kg K2O/fed.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
increasing K from 0 to 40 kg K2O/fede0
Outcome
NO3 accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO3 accumulation was increased with increasing K from 0 to 40 kg K2O/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2107 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce nitrate accumulation decreased at the 60 kg potassium level.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
60 kg levele0
Outcome
NO3 accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
40 kg K2O/fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO3 accumulation was increased with increasing K from 0 to 40 kg K2O/fed, then decreased at 60 kg level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2139 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero potassium with all nitrogen sources gave the lowest lettuce N, P, K, and nitrate contents.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
K 0 level with all N-sourcese0
Outcome
N, P, K and NO3 contente0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K 0 level with all N-sources were the treatments of the lowest N, P, K and NO3 content relative to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2166–2282 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate or urea with 60 kg K2O/fed. yielded the highest lettuce N, P, and K content.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
NO3NH4 and urea x 60 kg K2O/fede0
Outcome
N, P and Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO3NH4 and urea x 60 kg K2O/fed were the treatment of the highest N, P and K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2283–2359 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea with 60 Kg K2O produced low lettuce nitrate content.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
urea x 60 Kg K2Oe0
Outcome
NO3 contente0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea x 60 Kg K2O was of low NO3 content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2372–2411 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend urea with 60 kg K2O/fed. for lettuce yield and low leaf nitrate.

Taxon
LETTUCELactuca sativat0
Treatment
Urea with 60 kg K2O/fede0
Outcome
best treatment on basis of yield and NO3 safety levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urea with 60 kg K2O/fed was the treatment of best yield and low NO3 content of leaves. So, it concluded as best treatment on basis of yield and NO3 safety level for human nutrition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2581–2762 · show in text ↑
t0

“LETTUCE LEAVES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–113 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium nitrate · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

potassium · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 35 positive, 17 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 61 positive, 18 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.