Abstract
The paper present an analysis of the biological efficacy of some new experimented during 2008-2011 at RIFG Pitesti, in order to protect the stored apples against apple scab, brown rot and other damaging storage diseases. During the experiment, 11 fungicides, including 9 single active ingredients and 2 new actives mixes, were tested by preventive treatments applied in the orchards on 4 winter apple cultivars ‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Idared’, ‘Nured Jonathan’ and ‘Starkrimson’. The biological material was stored in the cold warehouse then assessed under lab conditions. The results obtained revealed that in control of brown rot, the best results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatment, Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment and Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatment (F%: 0.75%; 0.25; 0%; 0%). As regard the control of apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%). Also, the treatments applied in 2011 with Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha and Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment protected very well the stored apples against the apple scab and 4 other specific storage diseases (F%: 0).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Chorus gave the best brown rot control, with F% of 0.75%.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- brown rote0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 0.75%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“brown rot, the best results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatment, Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment and Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatment (F%: 0.75%; 0.25; 0%; 0%)”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Rovral gave the best brown rot control, with F% of 0.25.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- brown rote0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 0.25e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“brown rot, the best results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatment, Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment and Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatment (F%: 0.75%; 0.25; 0%; 0%)”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Switch gave the best brown rot control, with F% of 0%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- brown rote0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“brown rot, the best results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatment, Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment and Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatment (F%: 0.75%; 0.25; 0%; 0%)”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Bellis gave the best brown rot control, with F% of 0%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- brown rote0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“brown rot, the best results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Rovral 500 SC - 1.5L/ha/treatment, Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment and Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha/treatment (F%: 0.75%; 0.25; 0%; 0%)”
t0“APPLE”
Claim · model-written summary
Chorus was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 0%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 0%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mystic Extra was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 0.36%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 0.36%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Topsin was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 0.75%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 0.75%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Score was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 1.37%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 1.37%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indar was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 1.75%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 1.75%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Toledo was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 2.01%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 2.01%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Folicur was among the finest scab controls, with F% of 2.25%.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scabe0
- Direction
- fineste0
- Value
- 2.25%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple scab, under storage conditions, the finest results were obtained with: Chorus 75 WDG - 0.3 kg/ha/treatment, Mystic Extra 0.75L/ha/treatment, Topsin M70 1kg/ha/treatment, Score 250 EC 0,2L/ha/treatment, Indar 5 EW 1,2 kg/ha/treatment, Toledo 430 SC 0.45L/ha/tratment, Folicur Solo 0.75L/ha/treatment (F%: 0%; 0.36%; 0.75%; 1.37%; 1.75%; 2.01%; 2.25%; 3.75%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bellis in 2011 protected stored apples against scab and four other diseases with F% of zero.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- apple scab and 4 other specific storage diseasese0
- Direction
- protected very welle0
- Value
- 0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatments applied in 2011 with Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha and Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment protected very well the stored apples against the apple scab and 4 other specific storage diseases (F%: 0)”
Claim · model-written summary
Switch in 2011 protected stored apples against scab and four other diseases with F% of zero.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatmente0
- Outcome
- apple scab and 4 other specific storage diseasese0
- Direction
- protected very welle0
- Value
- 0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatments applied in 2011 with Bellis 38 WG 0.8 kg/ha and Switch 62.5 - 1kg/ha/treatment protected very well the stored apples against the apple scab and 4 other specific storage diseases (F%: 0)”
The same questions in other papers
Bellis · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.