Paper · 2022 · BMC Plant Biology

Study of the grafting compatibility of the apple rootstock 12–2, resistant to apple replant diseases (ARD)

Yunfei Mao; Xueli Cui; Haiyan Wang; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cultivation of resistant rootstocks can effectively prevent apple replant disease (ARD), and grafting tests are an important means of evaluating the compatibility of rootstocks with scions. METHODS: The apple rootstocks 12-2 (self-named) and Malus hupehensis Rehd. (PYTC) were planted in a replanted 20-year-old apple orchard. The two rootstocks were grafted with scions of 13 apple varieties. Multiple aboveground physiological parameters of the grafted combinations were measured and evaluated to verify the grafting affinity of 12-2 with the scions as compared to Malus hupehensis Rehd. (PYTC). RESULTS: The graft survival rate and graft interface healing of 12-2 did not differ significantly from those of PYTC. Mechanical strength tests of the grafted interfaces showed that some mechanical strength indices of Redchief, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur and Yinv apple varieties were significantly higher when they were grafted onto 12-2 compared to the PYTC control. The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control. The rootstock 12-2, therefore, showed good grafting affinity. CONCLUSION: These results provide experimental materials and theoretical guidance for the cultivation of a new grafting compatible rootstock to the 13 studied apple cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graft survival rate and graft interface healing of 12-2 did not differ significantly from PYTC

Material
12-2e1
Outcome
graft survival rate and graft interface healinge1
Direction
did not differe1
Comparator
PYTCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The graft survival rate and graft interface healing of 12-2 did not differ significantly from those of PYTC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some mechanical strength indices of Redchief, Jonagold and Starking were significantly higher when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Redchief, Jonagold, Starkinge2
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e2
Outcome
mechanical strength indicese2
Direction
significantly highere2
Comparator
PYTC controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Mechanical strength tests of the grafted interfaces showed that some mechanical strength indices of Redchief, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur and Yinv apple varieties were significantly higher when they were grafted onto 12-2 compared to the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some mechanical strength indices of Goldspur and Yinv were significantly higher when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Goldspur and Yinve2
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e2
Outcome
mechanical strength indicese2
Direction
significantly highere2
Comparator
PYTC controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Mechanical strength tests of the grafted interfaces showed that some mechanical strength indices of Redchief, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur and Yinv apple varieties were significantly higher when they were grafted onto 12-2 compared to the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1 and RedChief were similar on 12-2 and PYTC

Material
Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChiefe3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew similarlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological parameters of Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1 and RedChief were similar on 12-2 and PYTC

Material
Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChiefe3
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leavese3
Direction
grew similarlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Gala, USA8 and Shoufu1 were similar on 12-2 and PYTC

Material
Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1e3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew similarlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological parameters of Gala, USA8 and Shoufu1 were similar on 12-2 and PYTC

Material
Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1e3
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leavese3
Direction
grew similarlye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Tianhong 2, Lvguang and Jonagold were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagolde3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Starking, Goldspur and Yinv were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Starking, Goldspur, Yinve3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot height and diameter of Luli were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Lulie3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
height and diameter of shootse3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological parameters of Tianhong 2, Lvguang and Jonagold were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagolde3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leavese3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological parameters of Starking, Goldspur and Yinv were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Starking, Goldspur, Yinve3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leavese3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf physiological parameters of Luli were better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto PYTC

Material
Lulie3
Treatment
grafted onto 12-2e3
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leavese3
Direction
grew bettere3
Comparator
PYTC controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple rootstock 12–2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“The height and diameter of shoots and the relative chlorophyll content, photosynthetic and fluorescence parameters, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde content of leaves showed that Fuji 2001, Tengmu No.1, RedChief, Gala, USA8, and Shoufu1 grew similarly on the two rootstocks, but Tianhong 2, Lvguang, Jonagold, Starking, Goldspur, Yinv and Luli grew better when grafted onto 12-2 than onto the PYTC control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1403 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 24 positive, 17 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

grafting · soil: biology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.