Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Advanced Research

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SPACING AND TRANSPLANTING DATES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF CAULIFLOWER (BRASSICAE OLERACEA VAR. BOTRYTIS L.)

Pooja Devi; Ashutosh Sharma; Arpan Saini; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment entitled Effect of different spacing and transplanting dates on growth and yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) was carried out at the experimental farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, DAV University, Jalandhar during 2019. The treatment combinations comprised of three dates of planting viz., 6th November, 23th November and 8th December and three spacings viz., 45×50cm, 50 x 50 cm and 50 x 60 cm in a Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. The cauliflower transplanted on the 2nd date of planting i.e. 23th November reported significantly maximum yield (9.03kg) over the other dates of planting, while spacing 50 x 60 cm showed significantly maximum growth for height, number of leaves, stem diameter. Whereas, the maximum number of days taken to curd initiation (114.33) and maturity (14.66) was recorded from 45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting dates. It can be concluded that the wider spacing gave best results for number of leaves per plant, plant height, stem diameter, curd diameter and yield. Interaction effect of spacing and transplanting datesresulted significance difference for all the character under study except plant height and number of days to curd maturity. It was observed that plants sown on 23 November resulted in superior performance for most of the traits studied. Among spacing, desirable results were observed at closer spacing of 50 cm × 50 cm. Considering the interaction of sowing dates and spacing it was found that plants sown on 23 November with the spacing of 50 cm × 50 cm can resulted in superior performance with respect to growth and yield parameters of cauliflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 23th November planting had the highest yield, 9.03kg.

Treatment
23th Novembere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.03kge0
Comparator
other dates of plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cauliflower transplanted on the 2nd date of planting i.e. 23th November reported significantly maximum yield (9.03kg) over the other dates of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing of 50 x 60 cm gave maximum height, leaf number and stem diameter.

Treatment
50 x 60 cme0
Outcome
height, number of leaves, stem diametere0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spacing 50 x 60 cm showed significantly maximum growth for height, number of leaves, stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting had the maximum time to curd initiation, 114.33 days.

Treatment
45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting datese0
Outcome
number of days taken to curd initiatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
114.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum number of days taken to curd initiation (114.33) and maturity (14.66) was recorded from 45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same spacing and date had maximum time to maturity, 14.66 days.

Treatment
45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting datese0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.66e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum number of days taken to curd initiation (114.33) and maturity (14.66) was recorded from 45cm×50cm spacing with 8th November transplanting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing gave the best leaf number, height, stem diameter, curd diameter and yield.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
number of leaves per plant, plant height, stem diameter, curd diameter and yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the wider spacing gave best results for number of leaves per plant, plant height, stem diameter, curd diameter and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and transplanting date interacted significantly for studied traits except height and days to curd maturity.

Treatment
spacing and transplanting datese0
Outcome
all the character under study except plant height and number of days to curd maturitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect of spacing and transplanting datesresulted significance difference for all the character under study except plant height and number of days to curd maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 23 November sowing gave superior performance for most traits.

Treatment
23 Novembere0
Outcome
most of the traits studiede0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants sown on 23 November resulted in superior performance for most of the traits studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer 50 cm × 50 cm spacing gave desirable results.

Treatment
50 cm × 50 cme0
Outcome
desirable resultse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“desirable results were observed at closer spacing of 50 cm × 50 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“CAULIFLOWER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found that 23 November sowing with 50 cm × 50 cm spacing could give superior growth and yield.

Treatment
23 November with the spacing of 50 cm × 50 cme0
Outcome
superior performance with respect to growth and yield parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants sown on 23 November with the spacing of 50 cm × 50 cm can resulted in superior performance with respect to growth and yield parameters of cauliflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1672 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.