Paper · 1991 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Force to Shear the Stalk, Stalk Diameter, and Yield of Broccoli in Response to Nitrogen Fertilization and Within-row Spacing

Brian A. Kahn; Phillip G. Shilling; Gerald H. Brusewitz; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Broccoli [Brassica oleracea L. (Italica Group)] crops may be rejected by wholesale buyers due to unacceptably tough stalks. Four experiments were conducted to examine the effects of various N levels and two within-row spacings (15 and 30 cm) on force to shear the stalk, stalk diameter, and yield of transplanted `Premium Crop' broccoli. Shear was not affected by within-row spacing, and average stalk diameter was decreased only 3 mm by reducing spacing from 30 to 15 cm. Although the 15-cm spacing sometimes produced the greatest total number of marketable, heads, this spacing resulted in higher cull head production, lower average marketable head weight, delayed maturity, and a lower percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable heads than the 30-cm spacing. Increasing N fertilization decreased force to shear the stalk in only one experiment, when plants were exposed to water deficits and high temperatures. Nitrogen affected stalk diameter only when very low rates (37 and 74 kg·ha -1 ) were included. Yield of marketable-quality heads often showed no significant response to rates of applied N >112 kg·ha -1 , particularly at the 30-cm spacing. Hollow stem was negligible in all experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within-row spacing did not affect stalk shear force.

Treatment
within-row spacinge0
Outcome
Sheare0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shear was not affected by within-row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing spacing from 30 to 15 cm decreased average stalk diameter by 3 mm.

Treatment
15 cme0
Outcome
average stalk diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3 mme0
Comparator
30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average stalk diameter was decreased only 3 mm by reducing spacing from 30 to 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15-cm spacing sometimes yielded the greatest total marketable head count.

Treatment
15-cm spacinge0
Outcome
total number of marketable, headse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 15-cm spacing sometimes produced the greatest total number of marketable, heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15-cm spacing increased cull head production.

Treatment
this spacinge0
Outcome
cull head productione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
30-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this spacing resulted in higher cull head production, lower average marketable head weight, delayed maturity, and a lower percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable heads than the 30-cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15-cm spacing lowered average marketable head weight.

Treatment
this spacinge0
Outcome
average marketable head weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
30-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this spacing resulted in higher cull head production, lower average marketable head weight, delayed maturity, and a lower percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable heads than the 30-cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15-cm spacing delayed maturity.

Treatment
this spacinge0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
30-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this spacing resulted in higher cull head production, lower average marketable head weight, delayed maturity, and a lower percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable heads than the 30-cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15-cm spacing lowered the percentage of transplants producing marketable heads.

Treatment
this spacinge0
Outcome
percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable headse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
30-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this spacing resulted in higher cull head production, lower average marketable head weight, delayed maturity, and a lower percentage of field-planted transplants producing marketable heads than the 30-cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen reduced stalk shear force only in one experiment under water deficit and high temperature.

Treatment
Increasing N fertilizatione0
Outcome
force to shear the stalke0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
only one experiment, when plants were exposed to water deficits and high temperaturese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N fertilization decreased force to shear the stalk in only one experiment, when plants were exposed to water deficits and high temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen affected stalk diameter only at very low included rates.

Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
stalk diametere0
Qualifier
very low rates (37 and 74 kg·ha -1 )e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen affected stalk diameter only when very low rates (37 and 74 kg·ha -1 ) were included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable head yield often did not respond significantly above 112 kg·ha -1 nitrogen, especially at 30-cm spacing.

Treatment
rates of applied N >112 kg·ha -1e0
Outcome
Yield of marketable-quality headse0
Direction
no significant responsee0
Qualifier
particularly at the 30-cm spacinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of marketable-quality heads often showed no significant response to rates of applied N >112 kg·ha -1 , particularly at the 30-cm spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hollow stem was negligible across experiments.

Outcome
Hollow steme0
Qualifier
in all experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hollow stem was negligible in all experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–63 · show in text ↑

density · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

density · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

density · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.