Paper · 2022 · Cells

Determination of Reactive Oxygen or Nitrogen Species and Novel Volatile Organic Compounds in the Defense Responses of Tomato Plants against Botrytis cinerea Induced by Trichoderma virens TRS 106

Justyna Nawrocka; Kamil Szymczak; Aleksandra Maćkowiak; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the present study, Trichoderma virens TRS 106 decreased grey mould disease caused by Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.) by enhancing their defense responses. Generally, plants belonging to the ‘Remiz’ variety, which were infected more effectively by B. cinerea than ‘Perkoz’ plants, generated more reactive molecules such as superoxide (O2−) and peroxynitrite (ONOO−), and less hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), S-nitrosothiols (SNO), and green leaf volatiles (GLV). Among the new findings, histochemical analyses revealed that B. cinerea infection caused nitric oxide (NO) accumulation in chloroplasts, which was not detected in plants treated with TRS 106, while treatment of plants with TRS 106 caused systemic spreading of H2O2 and NO accumulation in apoplast and nuclei. SPME-GCxGC TOF-MS analysis revealed 24 volatile organic compounds (VOC) released by tomato plants treated with TRS 106. Some of the hexanol derivatives, e.g., 4-ethyl-2-hexynal and 1,5-hexadien-3-ol, and salicylic acid derivatives, e.g., 4-hepten-2-yl and isoamyl salicylates, are considered in the protection of tomato plants against B. cinerea for the first time. The results are valuable for further studies aiming to further determine the location and function of NO in plants treated with Trichoderma and check the contribution of detected VOC in plant protection against B. cinerea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRS 106 decreased Botrytis grey mould in tomato.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Trichoderma virens TRS 106e0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma virens TRS 106Trichoderma virense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
grey mould diseasee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma virens TRS 106 decreased grey mould disease caused by Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.) by enhancing their defense responses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remiz plants were infected more effectively by B. cinerea than Perkoz plants.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume1
Material
Remize0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
infected more effectivelye0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
Perkoze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants belonging to the ‘Remiz’ variety, which were infected more effectively by B. cinerea than ‘Perkoz’ plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remiz plants generated more superoxide and peroxynitrite than Perkoz plants.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume1
Material
Remize2
Outcome
superoxide (O2−) and peroxynitrite (ONOO−)e0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Perkoze2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generated more reactive molecules such as superoxide (O2−) and peroxynitrite (ONOO−)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants belonging to the ‘Remiz’ variety, which were infected more effectively by B. cinerea than ‘Perkoz’ plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–304 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Remiz plants generated less hydrogen peroxide, S-nitrosothiols and green leaf volatiles.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume1
Material
Remize2
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), S-nitrosothiols (SNO), and green leaf volatiles (GLV)e0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
Perkoze2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and less hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), S-nitrosothiols (SNO), and green leaf volatiles (GLV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–142 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants belonging to the ‘Remiz’ variety, which were infected more effectively by B. cinerea than ‘Perkoz’ plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cinerea infection caused nitric oxide accumulation in chloroplasts.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage
chloroplastse0
Treatment
B. cinerea infectione0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
nitric oxide (NO) accumulation in chloroplastse0
Direction
accumulatione0
Comparator
plants treated with TRS 106e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. cinerea infection caused nitric oxide (NO) accumulation in chloroplasts, which was not detected in plants treated with TRS 106”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–672 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRS 106 treatment caused systemic hydrogen peroxide spread and nitric oxide accumulation in apoplast and nuclei.

Taxon
tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)Solanum lycopersicume1
Organ / stage
apoplast and nucleie0
Treatment
TRS 106e0
Interactor
TRS 106e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
systemic spreading of H2O2 and NO accumulatione0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of plants with TRS 106 caused systemic spreading of H2O2 and NO accumulation in apoplast and nuclei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato plants (S. lycopersicum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TRS 106 treated tomato released 24 volatile organic compounds.

Treatment
TRS 106e0
Interactor
TRS 106e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
volatile organic compounds (VOC) releasede0
Value
24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPME-GCxGC TOF-MS analysis revealed 24 volatile organic compounds (VOC) released by tomato plants treated with TRS 106”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed roles for hexanol and salicylic acid derivatives in tomato protection against B. cinerea.

Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Compound
4-ethyl-2-hexynal and 1,5-hexadien-3-ole0
Outcome
protection of tomato plants against B. cinereae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some of the hexanol derivatives, e.g., 4-ethyl-2-hexynal and 1,5-hexadien-3-ol, and salicylic acid derivatives, e.g., 4-hepten-2-yl and isoamyl salicylates, are considered in the protection of tomato plants against B. cinerea for the first time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–124 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma virens · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.