Paper · 2001 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF IBA AND NAA, PLANTING DATE AND TYPE OF CUTTING ON ROOTING POTENTIAL OF TWO Ficus species

A. Sabbour,; M. El-Sgai; M. Rowezak

20
claims
47
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ. during the two successive seasons; 1998/99 and 1999/2000 on four fixed dates representing the four seasons of the year. Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations; 0,1000,2000,3000 and 4000 ppm. Data were collected on the following characters: rootintg and surrvival percentage, average number and length of adventitious roots per cutting, root fresh and dry weight and root index. The study revealed the following, In both species, IBA treatments caused a pronounced increase in rooting potantial compared with NAA. The highest rooting percentages were achieved with 3000 ppm concentration of both IBA and NAA. Planting cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii in January (winter) produced the highest rooting percentages, followed by those planted in April (spring), while cuttings planted in July (summer) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage.Planting cuttings of Ficus benjamina var. exotica in April (spring) produced the highest rooting percentage followed by those planted in July (summer), while cuttings planted in January (winter) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage. Ficus retusa var. hawaii semi-hard cuttings produced the highest rooting potential as compared with terminal cuttings. On the contrary, Ficus benjamina var. exotica terminal cuttings produced the highest rooting percentages as compared to semi-hard cuttings. The normal mortality percentage ranged between 5-7%. The lowest mortality percentages were found at winter planting date and spring planting date for Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica, respectively. The highest number of roots per cutting was achieved with 3000 ppm IBA and NAA in both species. Although, all IBA treatments produced a pronounced increase in advantitious root length. In both species NAA assigned concentrations did not cause any significant increase in average length of adventitious roots. The average fresh and dry weight of roots developed on cuttings of both Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica treated with IBA was higher than that treated with NAA. Planting cuttings in winter produced the highest root index in Ficus retusa var. hawaii. While, the lowest root index was achieved at summer planting date. Planting cuttings in spring produced the highest root index in Ficus benjamina var. exotica. While, the lowest root index was obtained at autumn and winter planting dates. The anatomical study shows that cuttings treated with 3000 ppm IBA activates the cambil initials forming a wider cambial zone which develop a small callus of parenchyma cells which activates the formation of adventatious root premordia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In both Ficus species, IBA treatments produced a pronounced increase in rooting potential compared with NAA.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
IBA treatmentse2
Outcome
rooting potantiale2
Direction
pronounced increasee2
Comparator
NAAe2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both species, IBA treatments caused a pronounced increase in rooting potantial compared with NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest rooting percentages in Ficus cuttings were obtained with 3000 ppm IBA and NAA.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
3000 ppm concentration of both IBA and NAAe3
Outcome
rooting percentagese3
Direction
higheste3
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest rooting percentages were achieved with 3000 ppm concentration of both IBA and NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus retusa var. hawaii cuttings planted in January (winter) had the highest rooting percentage, followed by April (spring) planting.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae4
Treatment
January (winter)e4
Outcome
rooting percentagese4
Direction
higheste4
Qualifier
followed by those planted in April (spring)e4
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“Planting cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii in January (winter) produced the highest rooting percentages, followed by those planted in April (spring), while cuttings planted in July (summer) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus retusa var. hawaii cuttings planted in July (summer) and October (autumn) had the lowest rooting percentage.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae4
Treatment
July (summer) and October (autumn)e4
Outcome
rooting percentagee4
Direction
loweste4
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“Planting cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii in January (winter) produced the highest rooting percentages, followed by those planted in April (spring), while cuttings planted in July (summer) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus benjamina var. exotica cuttings planted in April (spring) had the highest rooting percentage, followed by July (summer) planting.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae5
Treatment
April (spring)e5
Outcome
rooting percentagee5
Direction
higheste5
Qualifier
followed by those planted in July (summer)e5
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“Planting cuttings of Ficus benjamina var. exotica in April (spring) produced the highest rooting percentage followed by those planted in July (summer), while cuttings planted in January (winter) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus benjamina var. exotica cuttings planted in January (winter) and October (autumn) had the lowest rooting percentage.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae5
Treatment
January (winter) and October (autumn)e5
Outcome
rooting percentagee5
Direction
loweste5
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“Planting cuttings of Ficus benjamina var. exotica in April (spring) produced the highest rooting percentage followed by those planted in July (summer), while cuttings planted in January (winter) and October (autumn) showed the lowest rooting percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-hard cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii had the highest rooting potential compared with terminal cuttings.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae6
Treatment
semi-hard cuttingse6
Outcome
rooting potentiale6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
terminal cuttingse6
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“Ficus retusa var. hawaii semi-hard cuttings produced the highest rooting potential as compared with terminal cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terminal cuttings of Ficus benjamina var. exotica had the highest rooting percentage compared with semi-hard cuttings.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae7
Treatment
terminal cuttingse7
Outcome
rooting percentagese7
Direction
higheste7
Comparator
semi-hard cuttingse7
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the contrary, Ficus benjamina var. exotica terminal cuttings produced the highest rooting percentages as compared to semi-hard cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal mortality percentage of the cuttings ranged between 5-7%.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Outcome
mortality percentagee2
Value
5-7%e2
Qualifier
normale2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“The normal mortality percentage ranged between 5-7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus retusa var. hawaii cuttings had the lowest mortality percentage when planted at winter planting date.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae1
Treatment
winter planting datee1
Outcome
mortality percentagese1
Direction
loweste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest mortality percentages were found at winter planting date and spring planting date for Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus benjamina var. exotica cuttings had the lowest mortality percentage when planted at spring planting date.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
spring planting datee1
Outcome
mortality percentagese1
Direction
loweste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest mortality percentages were found at winter planting date and spring planting date for Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest number of roots per cutting in Ficus was obtained with 3000 ppm IBA and NAA.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
3000 ppm IBA and NAAe2
Outcome
number of roots per cuttinge2
Direction
higheste2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest number of roots per cutting was achieved with 3000 ppm IBA and NAA in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All IBA treatments gave a pronounced increase in adventitious root length in Ficus cuttings.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
IBA treatmentse2
Outcome
advantitious root lengthe2
Direction
pronounced increasee2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although, all IBA treatments produced a pronounced increase in advantitious root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA concentrations did not significantly increase average adventitious root length in Ficus cuttings.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
NAA assigned concentrationse2
Outcome
average length of adventitious rootse2
Direction
did not cause any significant increasee2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both species NAA assigned concentrations did not cause any significant increase in average length of adventitious roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1992–2114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh and dry root weight of Ficus cuttings was higher with IBA than with NAA.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminaFicus retusae1
Treatment
IBAe1
Outcome
average fresh and dry weight of rootse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
NAAe1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average fresh and dry weight of roots developed on cuttings of both Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica treated with IBA was higher than that treated with NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2116–2300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus retusa var. hawaii cuttings planted in winter had the highest root index.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae1
Treatment
in wintere1
Outcome
root indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Planting cuttings in winter produced the highest root index in Ficus retusa var. hawaii. While, the lowest root index was achieved at summer planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus retusa var. hawaii cuttings planted at summer planting date had the lowest root index.

Taxon
Ficus retusa var. hawaiiFicus retusae1
Treatment
summer planting datee1
Outcome
root indexe1
Direction
loweste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus retusa
Ficus retusa · TaxonAftabbanoori · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Planting cuttings in winter produced the highest root index in Ficus retusa var. hawaii. While, the lowest root index was achieved at summer planting date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2302–2456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus benjamina var. exotica cuttings planted in spring had the highest root index.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
in springe1
Outcome
root indexe1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Planting cuttings in spring produced the highest root index in Ficus benjamina var. exotica. While, the lowest root index was obtained at autumn and winter planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2458–2628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ficus benjamina var. exotica cuttings planted at autumn and winter planting dates had the lowest root index.

Taxon
Ficus benjamina var. exoticaFicus benjaminae1
Treatment
autumn and winter planting datese1
Outcome
root indexe1
Direction
loweste1
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Planting cuttings in spring produced the highest root index in Ficus benjamina var. exotica. While, the lowest root index was obtained at autumn and winter planting dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2458–2628 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The anatomical study indicates that 3000 ppm IBA widens the cambial zone and activates the formation of adventitious root primordia in Ficus cuttings.

Taxon
FicusFicuse1
Treatment
3000 ppm IBAe2
Outcome
formation of adventatious root premordiae2
Qualifier
a wider cambial zonee2
Setting
Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus
Ficus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)איתן פרמן 14:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present work was conducted at the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo Univ.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Semi-hard and terminal cuttings of Ficus retusa var. hawaii and Ficus benjamina var. exotica were treated by IBA or NAA with five different concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anatomical study shows that cuttings treated with 3000 ppm IBA activates the cambil initials forming a wider cambial zone which develop a small callus of parenchyma cells which activates the formation of adventatious root premordia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2630–2865 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Ficus (figs)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus (figs)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.