Paper · 2022 · Forests

Effective Methods for Adventitious Root Regeneration on Weeping Fig Stems

Nelson Li; Yusen Chang

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

When transplanting mature Ficus trees, the large root balls are expensive to treat, handle, and move. This study aimed to identify the optimal wounding method and auxin treatment for regenerating adventitious roots (ARs) from weeping fig (Ficus benjamina L.) stems to uptake additional water and to compensate for fewer absorption roots in the smaller root balls at transplantation. We adopted a two-factorial experiment involving the wounding methods (three-line cut (3LC) and rectangular peel (RP)) and auxin treatments (2000 mg·L−1 Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), 2000 mg·L−1 IBA + 2000 mg·L−1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 4000 mg·L−1 IBA). The rooting rate of each treatment, the mean root number, the length of the three longest ARs, and the dry weight of ARs in each wound were evaluated. The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13 (rectangular peel 1/3 the perimeter of the stem) consistently exhibited the best rooting results in 2019 and 2020. It had a 100% rooting rate, a mean of 18.5 roots, a 16.8 cm root length, and a 1640 mg dry weight in the wounds. All auxin treatments demonstrated a superior rooting ability as compared to water treatments. The RP method regenerated more roots than the 3LC method. Doubling the RP length to be 2/3 of the perimeter improved the rooting ability. The locations of ARs varied under different treatment combinations, with 4000 mg·L−1 IBA on RP13 demonstrating the most diversified distribution on four edges of the wounds. Thus, it is recommended to regenerate ARs from stems of F. benjamina trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 4000 mg/L IBA with rectangular peel of 1/3 the stem perimeter (RP13) consistently gave the best rooting results in 2019 and 2020.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13e1
Outcome
rooting resultse1
Direction
beste1
Qualifier
2019 and 2020e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13 (rectangular peel 1/3 the perimeter of the stem) consistently exhibited the best rooting results in 2019 and 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–970 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best treatment (4000 mg/L IBA with RP13) gave a 100% rooting rate in the wounds.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13e1
Outcome
rooting ratee2
Value
100%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“It had a 100% rooting rate, a mean of 18.5 roots, a 16.8 cm root length, and a 1640 mg dry weight in the wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best treatment (4000 mg/L IBA with RP13) gave a mean of 18.5 roots in the wounds.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13e1
Outcome
rootse2
Value
18.5 rootse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“It had a 100% rooting rate, a mean of 18.5 roots, a 16.8 cm root length, and a 1640 mg dry weight in the wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best treatment (4000 mg/L IBA with RP13) gave a root length of 16.8 cm in the wounds.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13e1
Outcome
root lengthe2
Value
16.8 cme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“It had a 100% rooting rate, a mean of 18.5 roots, a 16.8 cm root length, and a 1640 mg dry weight in the wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best treatment (4000 mg/L IBA with RP13) gave an adventitious root dry weight of 1640 mg in the wounds.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13e1
Outcome
dry weighte2
Value
1640 mge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment combination using 4000 mg·L−1 IBA with RP13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“It had a 100% rooting rate, a mean of 18.5 roots, a 16.8 cm root length, and a 1640 mg dry weight in the wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All auxin treatments gave superior rooting ability compared with water treatments.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
auxin treatmentse1
Outcome
rooting abilitye1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
water treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“All auxin treatments demonstrated a superior rooting ability as compared to water treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rectangular peel (RP) method regenerated more roots than the three-line cut (3LC) method.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
RP methode1
Outcome
rootse1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
3LC methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RP method regenerated more roots than the 3LC method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling the rectangular peel length to 2/3 of the stem perimeter improved rooting ability.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
Doubling the RP length to be 2/3 of the perimetere1
Outcome
rooting abilitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Doubling the RP length to be 2/3 of the perimeter improved the rooting ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The locations of adventitious roots varied under different treatment combinations.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Outcome
locations of ARs variede1
Qualifier
different treatment combinationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The locations of ARs varied under different treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4000 mg/L IBA with RP13 treatment gave the most diversified distribution of adventitious roots on the four edges of the wounds.

Taxon
Weeping FigFicus benjaminat0
Treatment
4000 mg·L−1 IBA on RP13e1
Outcome
distribution on four edges of the woundse1
Direction
most diversifiede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weeping Fig”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“with 4000 mg·L−1 IBA on RP13 demonstrating the most diversified distribution on four edges of the wounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1489 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend regenerating adventitious roots from stems of F. benjamina trees.

Taxon
F. benjaminaFicus benjaminae1
Outcome
regenerate ARs from stemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus benjamina
Ficus benjamina · TaxonKENPEI · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“it is recommended to regenerate ARs from stems of F. benjamina trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1565 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

class · growth · Ficus benjamina (weeping fig)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.