Paper · 2022 · Discover Food

Foliar application of thiourea, salicylic acid, and kinetin alleviate salinity stress in maize grown under etiolated and de-etiolated conditions

Granaz; Kanval Shaukat; Ghous Baksh; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Salinity stress and the absence of light negatively impact growth and development of the plants. Morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes of maize ( Zea mays L.) get severely affected by salt stress and subdue light. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted under the prevailing environmental conditions of Turbat, Balochistan, to explore etiolation and the de-etiolation response of maize hybrid (SP-17S23) to salinity stress under exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs). Maize seedlings in three sets, i.e., non-etiolated, etiolated, de-etiolated, subjected to salinity stress (120 mM NaCl) after 15 days of seed germination. After a week, the seedlings were sprayed with optimized levels of different PGRs, including thiourea (TU; 10 mM), salicylic acid (SA; 250 µM), and kinetin (KIN; 3 µM). Salinity stress hampered plant growth and affected morpho-physiological attributes. However, PGRs foliar treatment proved effective, thus ameliorating the impact of salinity and etiolation on maize seedlings. Growth attributes (root/shoot length, leaf area, root/shoot fresh and dry weight), photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, b and carotenoids) were significantly enhanced under the foliar treatment of PGRs, especially under TU and KIN treatments. However, the oxidative damage parameters, i.e., malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), decreased under the treatment of PGRs, thereby protecting seedlings under salinity and etiolated conditions. Overall, PGRs enhanced tolerance potential of plants under salinity stress with the consideration of light variations remain the key concern for developing healthy and vigor seedling strands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity stress hampered maize growth and physiological traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Salinity stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
hamperede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity stress hampered plant growth and affected morpho-physiological attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR foliar treatments alleviated salinity and etiolation impacts.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
PGRs foliar treatmente0
Outcome
impact of salinity and etiolatione0
Direction
amelioratinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGRs foliar treatment proved effective, thus ameliorating the impact of salinity and etiolation on maize seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR treatments significantly enhanced maize root and shoot growth traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar treatment of PGRse0
Outcome
root/shoot length, leaf area, root/shoot fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth attributes (root/shoot length, leaf area, root/shoot fresh and dry weight), photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, b and carotenoids) were significantly enhanced under the foliar treatment of PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR treatments significantly enhanced photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar treatment of PGRse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, b and carotenoids)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, b and carotenoids) were significantly enhanced under the foliar treatment of PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR treatments decreased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
treatment of PGRse0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 )e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), decreased under the treatment of PGRs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑

class · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 50 positive, 7 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

class · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 53 positive, 15 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

salinity · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 26 positive, 231 negative or no effect

230 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

class · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.