Abstract
Abstract In fungicide tests using recommended rates of fungicide on peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch], benomyl in a full season schedule was significantly better than captan against scab and brown rot in 3 out of 4 tests. A 6 application schedule, omitting several cover sprays, was never significantly better than the full captan schedule in the same tests. Bloom sprays did not result in improved brown rot control in 5 tests.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Full-season benomyl controlled peach scab better than captan in three of four tests.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- benomyl in a full season schedulee0
- Outcome
- scabe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 3 out of 4 testse0
- Comparator
- captane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benomyl in a full season schedule was significantly better than captan against scab and brown rot in 3 out of 4 tests.”
t0“Peach Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Full-season benomyl controlled peach brown rot better than captan in three of four tests.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- benomyl in a full season schedulee0
- Outcome
- brown rote0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 3 out of 4 testse0
- Comparator
- captane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benomyl in a full season schedule was significantly better than captan against scab and brown rot in 3 out of 4 tests.”
t0“Peach Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
A six-application spray schedule was never significantly better than full-schedule captan.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- 6 application schedulee0
- Outcome
- never significantly bettere0
- Direction
- never significantly bettere0
- Comparator
- full captan schedulee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A 6 application schedule, omitting several cover sprays, was never significantly better than the full captan schedule in the same tests.”
t0“Peach Disease”
Claim · model-written summary
Bloom sprays did not improve peach brown rot control across five tests.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Bloom sprayse0
- Outcome
- brown rot controle0
- Direction
- did not result in improvede0
- Value
- 5 testse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bloom sprays did not result in improved brown rot control in 5 tests.”
t0“Peach Disease”
The same questions in other papers
benomyl · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →climate site · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.