Paper · 2022 · Journal of Applied and Natural Science

Influence of potassium iodate and chitosan iodate complex on growth, yield, quality and iodine uptake in ‘shivam’ hybrid of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

VR. Mageshen; P. Santhy; S. Meena; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An iodine biofortification experiment was conducted by applying potassium iodate fertilizer in soil and foliar form and chitosan complex forms to investigate the growth, yield, quality and uptake of iodine in shivam hybrid of tomato in Palaviduthi soil series of Coimbatore region. Soil fertilization alone resulted in lower uptake of iodine in fruits because the iodine is susceptible to high volatilization and less phytoavailability and also resulted in less yield and poor quality of fruits. When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form, the quality of the fruits was found to be superior (carotene-1.24 mg 100gm-1 ascorbic acid- 3.56 mg 100gm-1, titrable acidity-0.96%), with higher fruit yield (94.81 t ha-1) and uptake of iodine in fruits (0.99ppm). Potassium iodate alone, either in the form of soil or foliar application, increased the quality of fruits, but it did not prevent the loss of various pigments and acids during ripening and also the loss of iodine through volatilization. But chitosan conserved the losses by reducing the respiration rate and oxygen permeability. Further, chitosan formed an electrostatic interaction with potassium iodate, preventing volatilisation and gradually increasing the bioavailability of iodine from soil to fruits. Hence biofortifying iodine in the form of potassium iodate chitosan complex was preferred for enhancing yield, improving quality and increasing the iodine content in fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fertilization alone with potassium iodate resulted in lower iodine uptake in tomato fruits.

Treatment
Soil fertilization alonee0
Outcome
uptake of iodine in fruitse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil fertilization alone resulted in lower uptake of iodine in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fertilization alone resulted in less yield and poor quality of tomato fruits.

Treatment
Soil fertilization alonee1
Outcome
yield and poor quality of fruitse0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulted in less yield and poor quality of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–494 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil fertilization alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of chitosan and potassium iodate in combination gave superior tomato fruit quality, with carotene at 1.24 mg 100gm-1.

Treatment
the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar forme0
Outcome
carotenee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
1.24 mg 100gm-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form, the quality of the fruits was found to be superior (carotene-1.24 mg 100gm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of chitosan and potassium iodate in combination gave superior tomato fruit quality, with ascorbic acid at 3.56 mg 100gm-1.

Treatment
the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar forme0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
superiore0
Value
3.56 mg 100gm-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form, the quality of the fruits was found to be superior (carotene-1.24 mg 100gm-1 ascorbic acid- 3.56 mg 100gm-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of chitosan and potassium iodate in combination gave superior tomato fruit quality, with titrable acidity of 0.96%.

Treatment
the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar forme0
Outcome
titrable aciditye0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form, the quality of the fruits was found to be superior (carotene-1.24 mg 100gm-1 ascorbic acid- 3.56 mg 100gm-1, titrable acidity-0.96%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of chitosan and potassium iodate in combination gave higher tomato fruit yield of 94.81 t ha-1.

Treatment
the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar forme0
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
94.81 t ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher fruit yield (94.81 t ha-1) and uptake of iodine in fruits (0.99ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of chitosan and potassium iodate in combination gave higher iodine uptake in tomato fruits of 0.99ppm.

Treatment
the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar forme0
Outcome
uptake of iodine in fruitse1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.99ppme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“When the chitosan and potassium iodate were applied in combination through foliar form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–582 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher fruit yield (94.81 t ha-1) and uptake of iodine in fruits (0.99ppm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium iodate alone, applied to soil or foliage, increased the quality of tomato fruits.

Treatment
Potassium iodate alone, either in the form of soil or foliar applicatione0
Outcome
quality of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potassium iodate alone, either in the form of soil or foliar application, increased the quality of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium iodate alone did not prevent the loss of various pigments and acids during ripening of tomato fruits.

Treatment
Potassium iodate alonee0
Outcome
loss of various pigments and acids during ripeninge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potassium iodate alone, either in the form of soil or foliar application, increased the quality of fruits, but it did not prevent the loss of various pigments and acids during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium iodate alone did not prevent the loss of iodine through volatilization.

Treatment
Potassium iodate alonee0
Outcome
loss of iodine through volatilizatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potassium iodate alone, either in the form of soil or foliar application, increased the quality of fruits, but it did not prevent the loss of various pigments and acids during ripening and also the loss of iodine through volatilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–1034 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan is asserted to have conserved losses in tomato fruits by reducing the respiration rate and oxygen permeability.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
lossese0
Qualifier
reducing the respiration rate and oxygen permeabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“chitosan conserved the losses by reducing the respiration rate and oxygen permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1126 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan is asserted to form an electrostatic interaction with potassium iodate, preventing volatilisation and gradually increasing the bioavailability of iodine from soil to fruits.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
bioavailability of iodinee0
Qualifier
electrostatic interaction with potassium iodatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“chitosan formed an electrostatic interaction with potassium iodate, preventing volatilisation and gradually increasing the bioavailability of iodine from soil to fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1305 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortifying iodine as potassium iodate chitosan complex is recommended for enhancing yield, improving quality and increasing iodine content in tomato fruits.

Outcome
enhancing yield, improving quality and increasing the iodine content in fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–130 · show in text ↑
e0

“biofortifying iodine in the form of potassium iodate chitosan complex was preferred for enhancing yield, improving quality and increasing the iodine content in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1479 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

iodate · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

iodate · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

iodate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iodate · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

potassium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 67 positive, 13 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

8 of 21 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.