Paper · 2007 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Potassium nutrition increases the lycopene content of tomato fruit

F. Serio; J. J. Leo; A. Parente; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryTo determine the influence of potassium levels in the nutrient solution on lycopene content, tomato plants were grown in a soil-less system using rockwool slabs as substrate. Two growing seasons were studied with the aim of comparing three potassium levels: low, medium and high (corresponding to 150, 300 and 450 mg K l–1 in the nutrient solution). In the first growing season (Spring–Summer), two high-pigment cultivars of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.,‘SVR’ and ‘Kabiria’) were compared. In the second growing season (Summer–Winter) ‘Esperanza’, a non high-pigment hybrid and the two previous cultivars were used. Total fruit yield was higher in the Summer–Winter growing season than in the Spring–Summer season, but was not influenced by potassium nutrition. Growing season, potassium level, and the genetic traits of the cultivars influenced the principal quality parameters of fruit, with higher dry matter and total soluble solids contents in the first growing season, correlating with lower lycopene and K+ contents in the fruit. The lycopene content increased linearly with increasing potassium level in the nutrient solution. The high-pigment genotypes showed a higher lycopene content than ‘Esperanza’. The higher lycopene content in ‘Kabiria’ fruit can also be related to the size of the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit yield was higher in Summer–Winter than Spring–Summer.

Outcome
Total fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Spring–Summer seasone0
Setting
Summer–Winter growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield was higher in the Summer–Winter growing season than in the Spring–Summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nutrition did not influence tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
potassium nutritione0
Outcome
Total fruit yielde0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total fruit yield was higher in the Summer–Winter growing season than in the Spring–Summer season, but was not influenced by potassium nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato dry matter and soluble solids were higher in the first growing season.

Outcome
dry matter and total soluble solids contentse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
first growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher dry matter and total soluble solids contents in the first growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dry matter and soluble solids in tomato correlated with lower fruit lycopene and K+ content.

Outcome
lycopene and K+ contents in the fruite0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
first growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher dry matter and total soluble solids contents in the first growing season, correlating with lower lycopene and K+ contents in the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit lycopene increased linearly with potassium level.

Treatment
increasing potassium level in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lycopene content increased linearly with increasing potassium level in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-pigment tomato genotypes had higher lycopene content than Esperanza.

Material
high-pigment genotypese0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‘Esperanza’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high-pigment genotypes showed a higher lycopene content than ‘Esperanza’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene content in Kabiria fruit was related to fruit size.

Material
‘Kabiria’e0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher lycopene content in ‘Kabiria’ fruit can also be related to the size of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 67 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

potassium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.