Abstract
Abstract Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land where a high incidence of bacterial canker was suspected in previous plantings, were pruned or pruned and inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae van Hall in October, December, February, or April. All trees pruned and inoculated in October or December were either dead or dying by May. P. syringae was recovered from all of the October-inoculated and from 86% and 71% of the December- and February-inoculated trees, respectively. Also, 43% mortality occurred in February-pruned and inoculated trees. Uninoculated but early-pruned trees showed severe short life or decline symptoms with 43% mortality following October and December pruning. On the other hand, April-pruned trees, whether inoculated or not, showed less short life or decline symptoms than early-pruned trees and no deaths occurred in April-pruned and inoculated trees.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Peach trees pruned and inoculated in October or December were dead or dying by May.
- Taxon
- peach trees
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- pruned and inoculated in October or Decembere5
- Outcome
- dead or dying by Maye5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e5“All trees pruned and inoculated in October or December were either dead or dying by May”
Claim · model-written summary
P. syringae was recovered from all October-inoculated peach trees.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- inoculatede1
- Interactor
- P. syringae
Pseudomonas syringaee1pathogen - Outcome
- P. syringae was recoverede1
- Value
- alle1
- Setting
- Octobere1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e1“P. syringae was recovered from all of the October-inoculated and from 86% and 71% of the December- and February-inoculated trees, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
P. syringae was recovered from 86% of December-inoculated peach trees.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- inoculatede1
- Interactor
- P. syringaePseudomonas syringaee1pathogen
- Outcome
- P. syringae was recoverede1
- Value
- 86%e1
- Setting
- Decembere1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e1“P. syringae was recovered from all of the October-inoculated and from 86% and 71% of the December- and February-inoculated trees, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
P. syringae was recovered from 71% of February-inoculated peach trees.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- inoculatede1
- Interactor
- P. syringaePseudomonas syringaee1pathogen
- Outcome
- P. syringae was recoverede1
- Value
- 71%e1
- Setting
- Februarye1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e1“P. syringae was recovered from all of the October-inoculated and from 86% and 71% of the December- and February-inoculated trees, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Trees pruned and inoculated in February had 43% mortality.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- pruned and inoculatede2
- Outcome
- mortalitye2
- Value
- 43%e2
- Setting
- Februarye2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e2“43% mortality occurred in February-pruned and inoculated trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated early-pruned peach trees showed severe short life or decline symptoms.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- early-prunede3
- Outcome
- short life or decline symptomse3
- Qualifier
- severee3
- Setting
- October and Decembere3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e3“Uninoculated but early-pruned trees showed severe short life or decline symptoms with 43% mortality following October and December pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Uninoculated early-pruned peach trees had 43% mortality.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- early-prunede3
- Outcome
- mortalitye3
- Value
- 43%e3
- Qualifier
- Uninoculatede3
- Setting
- October and Decembere3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e3“Uninoculated but early-pruned trees showed severe short life or decline symptoms with 43% mortality following October and December pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
April-pruned peach trees showed less short life or decline symptoms than early-pruned trees, whether inoculated or not.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- April-pruned treese4
- Outcome
- short life or decline symptomse4
- Direction
- lesse4
- Qualifier
- whether inoculated or note4
- Comparator
- early-pruned treese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e4“On the other hand, April-pruned trees, whether inoculated or not, showed less short life or decline symptoms than early-pruned trees and no deaths occurred in April-pruned and inoculated trees”
Claim · model-written summary
No deaths occurred in April-pruned and inoculated peach trees.
- Taxon
- peach treesPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- April-pruned and inoculated treese4
- Outcome
- deathse4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year-old peach trees [ Prunus persica (L) Batsch. cv. Elberta] growing on old peach land”
e4“On the other hand, April-pruned trees, whether inoculated or not, showed less short life or decline symptoms than early-pruned trees and no deaths occurred in April-pruned and inoculated trees”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.