Paper · 1976 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Association between Elemental Content of Dormant Peach Trees and Susceptibility to Short Life1

D. J. Weaver; W. M. Dowler; W. C. Nesmith

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract During winter months, concentrations of K, Ca, Al, Sr, B and Zn were significantly greater in twigs of apparently healthy, dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees grown on old peach orchard sites than in twigs of apparently healthy trees on adjacent new sites in Georgia. Later in the spring, tree mortality and injury from cold and bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall were also much greater on the old sites than the new sites. Differences in elemental concentrations in roots and 2-year-old shoots were not significant when trees on old and new orchard sites were compared. In a short life site in South Carolina, pruning trees in November greatly increased tree mortality compared to fumigated or nonfumigated trees pruned in February. Concentrations of K, Mg, Fe, and Al were also significantly greater in the November-pruned trees than in the February-pruned trees. Accumulation during dormancy of certain elements in peach twigs may be an indicator that the trees have been predisposed to short life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig concentrations of K, Ca and Al were greater in dormant peach trees on old orchard sites than on new sites.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
K, Ca, Ale1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
adjacent new sitese1
Setting
old peach orchard sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations of K, Ca, Al, Sr, B and Zn were significantly greater in twigs of apparently healthy, dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees grown on old peach orchard sites than in twigs of apparently healthy trees on adjacent new sites in Georgia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–289 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig concentrations of Sr, B and Zn were greater in dormant peach trees on old orchard sites than on new sites.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Organ / stage
twigse1
Outcome
Sr, B and Zne1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
adjacent new sitese1
Setting
old peach orchard sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“concentrations of K, Ca, Al, Sr, B and Zn were significantly greater in twigs of apparently healthy, dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees grown on old peach orchard sites than in twigs of apparently healthy trees on adjacent new sites in Georgia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–289 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree mortality and injury from cold and bacterial canker were much greater on old sites than on new sites.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringaePseudomonas syringaee2pathogen
Outcome
tree mortality and injurye2
Direction
greatere2
Setting
old sitese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“tree mortality and injury from cold and bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae Van Hall were also much greater on the old sites than the new sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning peach trees in November greatly increased tree mortality compared with February pruning.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
pruning trees in Novembere3
Outcome
tree mortalitye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
fumigated or nonfumigated trees pruned in Februarye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e3

“pruning trees in November greatly increased tree mortality compared to fumigated or nonfumigated trees pruned in February”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations of K, Mg and Fe were significantly greater in November-pruned than in February-pruned peach trees.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
November-pruned treese4
Outcome
Concentrations of K, Mg, Fee4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
February-pruned treese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e4

“Concentrations of K, Mg, Fe, and Al were also significantly greater in the November-pruned trees than in the February-pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentration of Al was significantly greater in November-pruned than in February-pruned peach trees.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
November-pruned treese4
Outcome
Ale4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
February-pruned treese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e4

“Concentrations of K, Mg, Fe, and Al were also significantly greater in the November-pruned trees than in the February-pruned trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in elemental concentrations in roots and 2-year-old shoots between old and new orchard sites were not significant.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Organ / stage
roots and 2-year-old shootse5
Outcome
elemental concentrationse5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
old and new orchard sitese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e5

“Differences in elemental concentrations in roots and 2-year-old shoots were not significant when trees on old and new orchard sites were compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–614 · show in text ↑
Observationhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormant-season accumulation of certain elements in peach twigs may indicate predisposition to short life.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Outcome
indicator that the trees have been predisposed to short lifee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dormant peach ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–181 · show in text ↑
e6

“Accumulation during dormancy of certain elements in peach twigs may be an indicator that the trees have been predisposed to short life”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1045 · show in text ↑

pruning · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.