Paper · 1975 · HortScience

Quality of Processed Tomato Products from Ethephon-ripened Fruit1

Louis Russo; R. H. Dougherty; H. C. Dostal; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract (2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied at 2.9 kg/ha to plants of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum MilUwhen 20-30% of the fruit were ripe, did not appreciably affect pH, total acidity, exterior color of the fruit, or consistency of the processed products. Organoleptic analyses of tomato juice indicated no differences in flavor between samples from ethephon-treated and untreated fruit. Chromatographic separation of fruit carotenoids showed that treated fruit synthesized more lycopene than controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not appreciably affect pH, acidity, fruit color or processed product consistency.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
(2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied at 2.9 kg/hae0
Outcome
pH, total acidity, exterior color of the fruit, or consistency of the processed productse0
Direction
did not appreciably affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(2-Chloroethyl)phosphonic acid (ethephon) applied at 2.9 kg/ha to plants of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum MilUwhen 20-30% of the fruit were ripe, did not appreciably affect pH, total acidity, exterior color of the fruit, or consistency of the processed products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato juice flavor did not differ between ethephon treated and untreated fruit.

Treatment
ethephon-treatede0
Outcome
flavore0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in flavor between samples from ethephon-treated and untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon treated fruit synthesized more lycopene than controls.

Treatment
treated fruite0
Outcome
lycopenee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treated fruit synthesized more lycopene than controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.