Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Nitrogen Effect on Fruit Quality and Yield of Muskmelon and Sweet Pepper Cultivars

Rafael Grasso; M. Teresa Peña-Fleitas; Romina de Souza; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Yield and fruit quality are two of the most important parameters for the profitability of vegetable crops. In commercial vegetable production, nitrogen (N) is commonly applied in excess, which is associated with nitrate (NO3−) leaching loss. In addition, excess N application may affect yield and fruit quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of N applications of very deficient N (N1, 2 mmol L−1), deficient N (N2, 8 mmol L−1), and conventional N (N3, 14 mmol L−1), according to local fertigation practices, in soil-grown muskmelon and sweet pepper crops in Almeria, South-Eastern Spain. The evaluation was conducted in three cultivars of each species. The yield and the fruit quality parameters of firmness, colour, total soluble solids (TSS) and morphometric variables were evaluated in two years for each species. For most parameters in both species, the effects of N, when significant, occurred regardless of cultivar. In muskmelon and sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2) was sufficient to achieve a maximum yield of 6.7 and 7.4 kg m−2, respectively. In muskmelon, very deficient N application led to an increase of 58% in the percentage of fruit discarded, mostly due to malformed and undersized fruits. Fruit firmness and red–green axis coordinate (a*) were not consistently affected by N in any of the crops. However, the fruit lightness (L*) increased with N addition in both species, likely because of increased chlorophyll pigments. With N addition, fruit TSS slightly decreased in muskmelon and slightly increased in sweet pepper. However, fruit TSS of both species were within reference values for commercialisation in the three N treatments. There were differences in yield between cultivars in muskmelon but not in sweet pepper, likely due to differences in fruit number in muskmelon. There were differences between cultivars in TSS and colour a* coordinate in both muskmelon and sweet pepper. Cultivars with higher TSS and a* coordinate will likely be more desirable for consumers because of the sweeter taste and more intense orange colour in muskmelon and reddish colour in sweet pepper. Overall, our manuscript showed that N application can be reduced, relative to the conventional N application, without reducing yield or fruit quality in muskmelon, yet additional studies should be conducted in sweet pepper to complement the results of the 2020 crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In muskmelon, application of 8.2 mmol N L-1 (N2) was sufficient to achieve a maximum yield of 6.7 kg m-2.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2)e0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In muskmelon and sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2) was sufficient to achieve a maximum yield of 6.7 and 7.4 kg m−2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L-1 (N2) was sufficient to achieve a maximum yield of 7.4 kg m-2.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2)e0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In muskmelon and sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2) was sufficient to achieve a maximum yield of 6.7 and 7.4 kg m−2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In muskmelon, very deficient N application increased the percentage of discarded fruit by 58%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
very deficient N applicatione0
Outcome
percentage of fruit discardede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In muskmelon, very deficient N application led to an increase of 58% in the percentage of fruit discarded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit lightness (L*) increased with N addition in both muskmelon and sweet pepper.

Taxon
muskmelon and sweet pepperCucumis meloCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
N additione1
Outcome
fruit lightness (L*)e1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In muskmelon and sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2) was sufficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the fruit lightness (L*) increased with N addition in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness and a* coordinate were not consistently affected by N in muskmelon or sweet pepper.

Taxon
muskmelon and sweet pepperCucumis meloCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
Ne1
Outcome
Fruit firmness and red–green axis coordinate (a*)e1
Direction
not consistently affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In muskmelon and sweet pepper, application of 8.2 mmol N L−1 (i.e., N2) was sufficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1028 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit firmness and red–green axis coordinate (a*) were not consistently affected by N in any of the crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With N addition, fruit TSS slightly decreased in muskmelon.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
fruit TSSe0
Direction
slightly decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With N addition, fruit TSS slightly decreased in muskmelon and slightly increased in sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With N addition, fruit TSS slightly increased in sweet pepper.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
N additione0
Outcome
fruit TSSe0
Direction
slightly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With N addition, fruit TSS slightly decreased in muskmelon and slightly increased in sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1578 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differed between muskmelon cultivars but not between sweet pepper cultivars.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences in yield between cultivars in muskmelon but not in sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1779 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N application can be reduced relative to conventional N application without reducing yield or fruit quality in muskmelon.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
yield or fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, our manuscript showed that N application can be reduced, relative to the conventional N application, without reducing yield or fruit quality in muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2305 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.